Member Info for YNWA91

Surprised there hasn’t been more share price movement on the back of this as excitement builds. We have had SP runs on far less. GLA

Ace - That’s not what I’m expecting but stranger things have happened. And if that’s the worst case scenario then we are all sitting pretty :)

As positive as it is for us when the POG is on the up, it could be resulting in Newmont asking for more for their 70% of Hav. Could do with completion before it rockets to where some believe gold is going.

MH01 - There was good chat yesterday until you ruined it with more pointless posts yet again. Just filter him then you don’t have to ruin the board every few days :)

Bamps - If we were to buy Hav/Telfer when would you expect the next resource update to be issued, as we all know we are sat on more than 2.9moz reserves but have had our hands tied with Newmont being in control?

If we met the GDX criteria how many would they need to buy does anyone know?

Trippy I think you might be proving his point. SD has said he wants a multi billion dollar company, not a company with ‘X’ share price.

MH01 - They are probably getting deleted due to the sheer number of pointless posts you put on clogging up the board.

The only thing more boring than the negative posts are the posts telling everyone to ignore the negative posts.

Like I predicted, as soon as there are any positive posts we get supposedly ‘LTH’ coming on saying don’t be expecting anything soon.

Everyone moaning about the constant negativity on here then Spy literally saying there is too much hope on here at the minute. Be wary of all these subtle negative posts.

We may not get first ore before the end of 24 but no reason the price won’t rocket with anticipation once milestones are close like purchase of 70%, Telfer, DTM, FS.

Although can Newmont even release a Decision to Mine for a project that they don’t intend to mine?

Also, would it be unreasonable for SD to want the DTM and possibly FS produced before we complete the purchase of a huge project? If it is ready though I don’t know why Newmont wouldn’t release it as would only increase the price they could ask for surely.

I understand when people say they can’t see Newmont paying staff to stand around doing nothing. But does anyone really believe that the decline wouldn’t have restarted by now if Newmont had declared Hav/Telfer a top priority?

I don’t even think the negative posters are shorter or anything like that. They stink of people who got spiked and had to sell for a loss, and are bitter because they don’t know how to invest successfully. Culpepper especially seems to fit this criteria.

No one invests or stays invested in a share that they think will lose value in the long run.

Got to laugh at some posts on here. Might want to consider that some of the ‘LTH’ on here that reply to the nonsense every night are quite possibly happy that the board is full of negative chat and that is why they are keeping it going? Don’t forget a lot of these ‘LTH’ have started being negative every time the SP starts to rise saying ‘don’t get carried away it will be back down soon’.

Got posters like James21 who literally said ‘Filter them for Christ's sake, you're as bad as they are when you engage‘. Then continues to engage with them….

MH01-If you just want facts from the company and not other people’s views, you are probably in the wrong place. Literally a bb for people to discuss their views.

You complain about others living their lives on here and you having to listen to them. You post everyday day and night and everyone else has to put up with your posts. No offence but weird you calling people out for doing what you do day in day out constantly filling up the board.

I would take speedies posts with a pinch of salt. People have been saying for 50 years that price of gold is being suppressed, which is probably true. Obviously gold is going to go up over the long term, it always does. It’s not much of a prediction if no timeframe is put on it.

It is similar to this share, if POG goes up they say I told you so, when it goes down then it has to be down to someone in the background trying to keep the price down to shaft us all. A bit like when shorters contributed to taking the SP from 35p+ down to 5.7p, and some were saying wouldn’t like to be in the shorters shoes now they must be panicking.

Exactly, when the price is on the way up the volume is usually higher, so they were making more money. By that logic they should manipulate every SP to go up not down.

I understand it, shareholders always need to have someone in the background to pin the blame on if the price falls or you would have to look at your own decisions. It’s not a dig by the way. Do you ever think MM manipulate the GGP price upwards? And do you agree with every other BB that if their price has gone down it must be manipulation or does it just apply to GGP?

A few ‘LTH’ on here were predicting this was a false rise and that we would fall straight back, it will be them all selling out while telling everyone else to hold their nerve.

Just out of interest what benefit do you think the MM get from playing ‘their usual games’? They make their money no matter what the SP is. The problem with the theory is when we’ve been flying the fast few days no one was saying that was ‘games’.

Click on any bb of a share that’s going down, even FTSE100/250 and you will see comments saying it is manipulation and that they are getting targeted. If it was so clear that everything is manipulated you wouldn’t invest a penny in any stock.