RE: Uruguay!!!2 Jul 2019 10:29
I wouldn't expect much at Uruguay.
The potential upside argument is that the mines there are being closed down because while there is gold at the site, it was uneconomic to extract it. The all in sustaining cost (AISC) was about $1340-1350, while gold was selling for just $1250. In theory at least, if gold were to take a leg up, and hold around the £1400-1450 range - never mind jumping to $1550 as certain excitable commentators claim could happen by the end of the year, that mine would theoretically be commercially viable again.
Unfortunately this has come too late. As per the April report, they are covering the tailing dam with gravel and removing the water. The equipment is in the process of being sold. This will raise funds to close the mine responsibly and pay of debts.
So the thin hope would be that if gold were to get to and stabilise at around $1450~, they could either reverse this process and open the mine again, or - perhaps more likely given the financial situation - someone else might bid a reasonable sum to get access to the territory and all related equipment. There was for example talk of digging the underground mine at VETA A, which should be more efficient, although potentially environmentally sensitive. If gold was suddenly very profitable, it might be possible to find investment (and, cynically, sufficient tax revenue to grease any permits) to make that possible.
This is however pure speculation, with no indication from the board they are exploring this option rather than just closing the mine, so shouldn't be factored into people's investment plans.