Member Info for wyndrum

I don't think its insider trading but its been clear to many (not ICE obviously), that money is an issue. So when 2 NED's are recruited, some with specific and detailed exp. in that area it is natural to assume that something is being actioned and that a relatively big hitter will get the job done.

Saint posted the connection between Zeus as a buyer of stock earlier this year and now Mr Hughes is an NED, who has a strong connection with Zeus.

Coincidence? Maybe, maybe not. We will find out tomorrow.

Whether or nots its a great day will depend on what news is released. If its warm words but vague, then no. If they actually release a credible plan or have already funded the gap, then that will be a huge worry for investors removed and that should be reflected in the SP.

The fact that the SP has been falling back is that investors are increasingly nervous but so far the relatively small scale of the fall suggests that perhaps its just a re-adjustment of risk for some holders.

Personally I was hoping for an RNS today, so i am not as confident as I was that tomorrow will be a great day. But who knows? Its a risk and you bet accordingly.

Am I missing something but the accounts are for year ending Dec 2024

"will announce its audited preliminary results for year ended December 31, 2024 ("FY24")

So by previously already announcing there is cash until Q1 2026 makes a "sign off " of these "delayed" accounts completely irrelevant.

The problem is what happens when Q1 2026 rolls up?

The funding is nothing and never has been to do with these accounts, its about how do the lights stay on in 6 months plus time.

Investors will want to know. Thats why there was the spike when the 2 Ned's were announced. It suggests that positive news will soon be revealed.

My take is that it will be tomorrow. If it isn't then when? and that uncertainty will almost certainly be transferred to the SP.

It really is all about the money.

Its squeaky bum time.

if there is a positive forward funding plan I would expect the shares will move forward. if there is no mention or too vague, of it then I guess the SP would fall.

Pretty binary.

"To my knowledge he has never given nasty posts to others"

Hmmm....

"Nobody loses money til they sell. Plenty will lose money because they do sell at the wrong time"

https://www.investors.com/how-to-invest/when-to-sell-stocks/

"Alan55 you down nothing unless you sell, simple."

https://www.investors.com/how-to-invest/when-to-sell-stocks/

I am sure there will be forward guidance as 6 months of the year has passed beyond this update.

The reason why Q1 2026 was highlighted specifically last year regarding cash runway is that it covered the then current financial year.

It would seem very unlikely that the cash runway for 2026 can be ignored at this late stage in this update, given that the next one is likely late sept early october.

The (only) cause for optimism is that the relationship between Mr Hughes and the apparent purchase of AVCT stock earlier this year by Zeus capital which suggests to me, that is an unlikely coincidence.

"Win and Co think they're clever at the moment because they are in and out trading for pennies "

Just for the record i had 77000 shares when they were valued at 285p. That might seem pennies to you but it was a fair amount for me in one stock.

And just so you understand how it works: When you say "they run the risk of being out when the inevitable lands "

One: IT IS NOT INEVITABLE. That is completely inaccurate.. There is NO RISK in being out. All you are referring to is that me, you, anyone might buy in at a new higher price after new news is revealed that causes a rerate to the stock. In other words buy now while the risk is higher for potentially better gain or wait for a more de-risked purchase.

"Parasites just trying to spread FUD to support there own trading position"

Do you think after 4 years of SP decline that IN FACT (not your pathetic mis representation of reality), that FUD has been the CORRECT course in this stock?

For every cautious post there are a dozen positive ones. I repeat: 4 years of decline, so how about taking some responsibility for deluding others into buying for your own parasitical gains? No, of course you won't because you simply can't bear to think you have been wrong in every prediction you have made to date.

I have posted ad nauseam that I continue to hold because I recognise that there is a chance that AVCT will navigate both the science and the finances involved to commercialise this product. I also emphasize that to date they have failed in previous commercial enterprises.

Still, lets not have any balance shall we? lets just have more of these utterly deceitful posts where you imply fantasy scenarios to cover your total ineptitude of any basic investor analysis.

Given the market cap, the announcement of the design win, while providing some initial volatility in the SP seems to be largely discounted.

The market i surmise is thereore not sure or willing to bet yet, on what this really means for CPX.

If it is half as good as it might be then there should be quite the rerate.

I think the risk reward still looks well in favour of SP appreciation over the next few months. (imo dyor etc etc)

Yeboa, "Anyone thinking their intentions are honourable are deluded."

So lets get this straight: I have warned caution for years with reasoning behind it on the stance I took. In that time the SP has collapsed.

How in those facts, can it be seen NOT to be in your word "honourable"?

Just to emphasize, i alerted people with my analysis why there were many question marks over AVCT. So far, had anyone agreed with my view they would have saved or made money.

Again, what malevolent intention can you draw from those FACTS?

You just make stuff up without a care in the world. Its stupid posts like yours and the equally stupid 15 recs that highlight the wrought emotion at the expense of anything like logic, on this BB.

No wonder you lose money.

Do tell.

"It is a better BB imo, when the personalisation and the fruitless and futile guesses of what the "agenda's" of various posters are, stop and some actually try and answer the awkward questions, ..."

Yeboah and pedro making the point somewhat predictably

Clearly, the irony is completely and utterly lost on a number of posters such as you B2, that can't wait to be rude and derisive when the fact is YOU have called this completely wrong from the start, rather then people like me.

And maybe this time these 2 latest additions will make a difference but Hughes did nothing for selling the LFT or contacts to make that a success previously did he?

(or shall that simply not count as its now history, and it can conveniently be forgotten how this BB became ecstatic over very job application on the website as proof positive that this was 100% done, or that every appointment has soo many contacts in the industry that it was proof positive it was a 100% done, or AS saying it was the best test in the world proving it was a 100% done, or the data with 98% and 97% SS as proof positive it was a 100% done. Or all the string to the bow, the shots on goal that could not miss as 100% proof positive this was a 100% done. (Every one, every single one to date has failed.) And not only that, every bit of the business has been flogged off to keep the lights on. Share holders have seen their capital decimated in the process.

But yes, 2 new NED's are proof positive that this is a 100% done........

Oh for a semblance of balance... still I can dream....

Someone ask Tim, if he has ever had an investment bomb (apart from this one), because if he has does that makes his research and understanding here, just as flawed or does his experience make him a better judge?

Like I say it works much better if the personal stuff is removed as it just gets in the way of any sort of rational debate on the pros and cons.

(BV has me on filter so this won't be read but)... "Yes, the announcement also said that Phase 1a was anticipated to complete by Q2 2022 but that was Alan's - a novice at clinical trials with a company full of naive employees - ambitious timescale and, more importantly, they were expecting to find the Maximum Tolerated Dose, something which they never needed to find due to AVA6000's amazing Therapeutic Window."

I would have a lot more time for that statement if it was made at the time but I don't recall anyone let alone BV, saying how naive and inexperienced the staff and BoD were at the time? That really is pretty dishonest to post that, to imply the company did not know what they were doing, as well as fairly insulting to all concerned I imagine.

Also I recall AS saying he did not expect MTD to be found in P1a. It was the forced extension that apparently wanted more effort to find an MTD and still AS said that may not be possible. (To me that is one of the untold mysteries of the trial. was that extra year or so about. very odd. The outcome intentional or otherwise has put the finances of the whole trial in jeopardy

"My comment: Hooray. It's bleeding obvious that Avacta will need to acquire more funds by the end of this year and there are many possibilities as to how that can be achieved. It is up to each individual to decide how to play this - buy low now, wait for a lower entry point or wait for a fundraiser, which will only be a good move if the raise price is lower than the current or later lower share price."

Well, it might be bleeding obvious to you now, but some here identified funding as the major issue some time ago. Your response, now you have caught up, is to proudly state how you filtered those views, so you arrive somewhat late to the party.

Its understandable that because AVCT are trying to do what they are, that it often here, becomes a very emotive subject.

My take (and I think the other few here) is that as this is a investment forum, that I specifically, can separate between their goals and whether or not this will be a successful investment.

I think this emotion can often overtake some posters here as you must realise too that AVCT is a commercial enterprise. They are not doing this work for free. The BoD if successful will likely become multi millionaires. If they fail, they will almost certainly go on to other jobs and still have a very very comfortable lifestyle. Investors here if it fails commercially, could potentially lose everything.

As a result It is not wrong, in my view, to look constantly at the risks involved.

As this is an evolving, developing company the risks and likely hood of various pathways move around continually, which is why the discussion here stays fairly vibrant.

It is a better BB imo, when the personalisation and the fruitless and futile guesses of what the "agenda's" of various posters are, stop and some actually try and answer the awkward questions, even if its to say something like "I don't know, and yes it is valid although i think your conclusions currently are too extreme"

I am the first to admit i don't what's going on either financially or scientifically. For me with my experience there are a number of "red flags" but at the same time there is to me, enough released data to realise that this stock has the potential to appreciate dramatically. So its a constant reassessment of risk reward, and always has been.

Pretty contentious, eh?

Thanks for sharing BV, I am sure that was of great interest to everyone else.

Its strange really, but the majority (when not feeling the need to defend themselves from spurious insults), of the "3 amigo's "posts actually generate a lot of the traffic and debate here, by forcing some issues to be confronted whether its liked or not.

Perhaps a case in point is the last few weeks or so where the whole board has now come around to realising the next funding solution was/is of critical importance to AVCT was raised well prior to that time by the " 3 amigo's"

The flaw with your approach of "reading" the filtered posts through the responses of others is pretty inefficient and I am not sure that that process gives you anything like the full picture for you then to make your somewhat, self righteous post.

Potential retrace to 34p to the now, support level. will give opportunity for those to buy in who felt they may have missed the boat....

(its had a couple of sessions now to go through 41/42p and has been rejected both times.)

Its at a resistance level needs to close at least above 41p (ideally above 42p)

Yeah its a bugger Chris, when the SP stays in a downtrend for years I look to think why that might be.

When the SP shows signs of reviving I jump in to see if I can a few £.

I don't know if you saw, but there was new news out this week. I did not get in the day before as it could have been a sucker punch, but once my criteria had been satisfied in conjunction with the news, I bought.

For all I know the update next week could be the most fantastic news, or it might be confirming a RI that decimates the SP? Who knows?

All you can do is see typically how things pan out and act accordingly. Or not, I suppose. How do you make a decision when to buy and sell? (Rhetorical, but you will have your own system and if you have stayed with this for years you might be sitting on quite a capital loss. Hopefully it will all come good but most investors try to maximise gains and minimise losses and adapt their systems through experience to achieve those aims.)

I have said for years I can't comment on the science as I do not have the experience or the full picture from AVCT to do so. I do have experience in company finance. My belief is that AVCT have put themselves in a difficult position due to a continued lack of funds.

They are not out of the woods yet, but we should know how dense the forest is next week.

I know ,I know, its so contentious I understand why you all get so upset.

Lda, that must make RNS's and account updates as well as any technical stuff quite challenging, for quite a few here then?