Member Info for WolfofWarks

Hi Holly

I think the negativity, suspicious, amateurish releases, etc, have dogged this share over the last couple of months.

I would hope to not have a RNS with names of customers as I think from a client perspective it would be poor. Financing arrangements should be confidential -especially when dealing with non-public companies.

In twelve months time maybe a testimonial or two would do wonders for the PR but we’re far too early for that it the moment.

I’ve seen a couple of these reply emails on Twitter. Assuming they are genuine what a difference using a proper PR form for releases makes.

Makes the company look far more professional and credible and should put to bed any thoughts about the company not being real.

Next stop for AZ beef up the website.

Yes snd the point it we don’t know what they are yet.

Therefore any predication of PE, PEG, etc, are pie in the sky.

Sales - Cost of Sales = Gross Profit
Gross Profit - Overheads = Net Profit

Net profit (or earnings) divided by number of share gives you EPS.

Share price/EPS gives PE Ratio.

So without a decent estimation of the cost base and therefore overheads we cannot reliably product any of the rations that follow on.

This is not a deramp it is GCSE level finance.

That’s a very good reply

Aim - this is where you are missing the point. I’m simply saying we don’t know the costs. I haven’t implied x10. You’re constructing your own false narrative.

Aim - that’s the whole point .... we don’t know .....

I’m losing the will to live here ...

Once we get a set of accounts we can analyse, extrapolate, draw reasonable conclusions.

This is still very much in the hypothesis stage until then.

We need a 20/21 update for Q1 for SH and forward guidance on the second monetisation.

This is why WG is such a big miss.

He is intelligent and articulate and could actually discuss the share without muppetry.

AIM - you’re just rambling nonsense now ....

“No you are right Wolf, AZ is clearly paying £50m on office rent and expenses per year. £2m for every salaried position. Joker.”

AIM you don’t seem to be able to read. I’ve simply implied that we don’t know what costs are. We need to set of accounts.

Seriously how difficult is it!!

“Wolf, I'd gladly say that office expenses and salaries ar offset by the due diligence fee of €16k per company.”

You do know there is a cost to carrying out DD? It’s not a free carry. Verifications take time and money.

Another post which to me points to you being completely clueless.

AIM

Quite frankly you are being thick. That is not what I have said. I have said we do not know what these costs are. It’s not the same thing.

Some of you only see what you want to see.

For those who are anxious about there losses look to posters like AIM who have ramped this to f ck without appearing to have even the most basic financial knowledge.

No there’s not AIM. There’s projected revenue for storm harbour of £6.5m which has been confirmed by RNS.

Can’t you tell me who much the management overhead is? Admin expenses, marketing, tech costs (sia etc). All the costs to do with sharia compliance, the chap in USA.

All these high profile signing come at a cost.

This was the downfall of WG’s projection. It assumed a linear profit margin on 1.5% which anyone is business knows only gross margin has that relationship (if you’re lucky). Overheads have to come off the bottom. We have no information on this.

Simple stuff really.

Aim. There is not a lot to base figures on at the moment until we know the cost base.

It’s all pie in the sky.

Welcome aboard.

For, against, on the fence, just roll your sleeves up and get stuck in!

I don't think WG has intentionally led anyone up the garden path. Perhaps got a bit giddy which might have affected his critical reasoning. If I was sitting on £100k profit I'd have struggled to have been in here this long.

He was always a gent as far as I'm concerned.

Bob - I use HSBC - can be a bit slow at 8am and when panic sets in but always fulfils my orders. Certainly doesn't have the problems HL seems to have.

Spotify - You need to learn to read. Maybe the bitterness and stress from sitting on your first large loss is impairing your eye sight.

That's a bit rich AIM.

A couple of weeks ago you didn't know the difference between revenue and earnings if I recall correctly.

Suck@Me

"I wouldn't say not attractive wolf, just many many people were rushing around like loons ripping their portfolios up trying to get back into the stock decimated by covid."

Bob - unattractive for those with that aim though.

I was one of those loons this week. I got the vaccine news alert on my phone logged into my account watching the live prices on my COVID medical stocks (SNG & AVCT) and managed to sell them in probably five minutes and I'm glad I did cause it preserved a lot of capital, Then yesterday I've rotated into value with three or four shares, kept some COVID stocks that should still do well be well and have SYME and GGP as my small cap risks.

I've took a hit but made good strides on the recovery. I did all that as a passive investor. Imagine what went on in the city.