Member Info for WolfofWarks

You need to go find some joy in your life Eileen.

There must be betters things to occupy your time rather than getting a rise out of Tesla holders.

Despicable stuff.

That’s probably the point as well that suppliers are paid for AW21 collection.

The beauty of this is no further dilution.

I think that’s what the market is now pricing in.

Only 4.5% down in pre market now.

Walter’s closed his short …. Course he has!

For seasoned investors then this isn’t really a change as you log all your details with your platform anyway.

This will probably work against those who use crypto to hide Ill gotten gains. Which again legitimises crypto as another asset class.

Increased reporting but the underlying tax payable would remain the same.

I hardly think I’m a fan boy!

‘Finally my Tesla shares would need to go down a really really long way before I was losing money on them I started buying at $280 pre-split so to approximately $60 and honestly I really cannot see that happening jeepers even Gordon Johnson cannot see that happening.’

Yep my reworked post split price is $108 last April and I’ll already sold most of mine, every time I slice though they just keep growing back.

Being I’ve cashed most of my gains I can never make a loss on Tesla unless I start buying again, which I am unlikely to do.

Well he obviously going at buy them at $6 a pop. Doesn’t mean he has to sell them.

Although at a selling price of $1200 you would be mad not to take something off the table.

I was looking at this yesterday and I reckon it’s a spiking waiting to happen similar to what happened with Argo earlier in the year.

A case of ‘Caveat Emptor’ for me.

What is this proposed taxation?

I would have thought it’s already taxed on income for traders and capital gains for holders. I remember reading on Twitter before the end if the US tax year I think a lot of investors where selling on the drop to reduce their capital gains.

Or are we talking about a completely separate taxation which would go some way towards legitimising crypto.

Remember whatever they propose they’ve got to be able to get it passed through both houses.

( Disclaimer: short at 1234 )

Very convenient Eileen.

A very strong of stench of BS.

The board have just received their performance based options which are something like $6 to buy.

I think what he said was that he doesn’t get paid a salary or bonuses he only owns Tesla stock. He obviously owns other stock like Space X and the Boring Company, although we don’t know if he draws a salary from them, probably doubtful. CNBC did a piece a while back about how he funds his lifestyles by borrowing against his Tesla stock so he pays very little tax (borrowing is not earnings) and also writes the interest payments off against his taxable income.

I know various targets have been met by the board so a huge volume of options will vest, hence insiders cashing in. Could be a rocky ride this week.

When you've got a series of long term fiat commitments it would be madness to convert to btc and subject the security for those commitments to the volatility.

This is the point companies discuss commercially sensitive information with business contacts everyday. It’s up to those contacts to then not act on it, which didn’t happen here. They could have been talking finance, investments, etc.

Have a look at other AIM shares when they have placin s but already have big investors on board who take most of those shares. They’ve had commercially sensitive discussions to get to that point.

Think when we were acquiring the Texas site before it was public knowledge. We would have spoke to the seller, lawyers, architects, surveyors, etc. They all would have received privileged sensitive information from the company which wasn’t in the public domain.

It’s impossible not to give out sensitive information in the normal course of business. That’s why the onus is on the recipient of that information not to trade off it.

I’ve had dealings on a lease surrender with a Plc that was about to shut 100 stores following a business review (which I was also in receipt of). I had to sign an NDA as this was information not in the public domain. It’s happens every day.

They’ve got to pay the bills. We’ve got no fiat income but still have to pay all the wages, electricity, etc.

We’ll always have to sell some btc to keep the lights on.

Fund managers go both long and short. Come on get a grip this is hardly a revelation they are sophisticated investors.

Dilution and fund raising are part and parcel of investing in start ups and the junior markets. Whether you understand this or not is the difference between whether you are a long term or short/medium term shareholder, or whether you understand the markets at all.

But inside information is disclosed all the time in the normal course of business. It’s up to the recipient of that information to ensure it doesn’t enter the public domain or they don’t trade off the back of it. Hence why you’d expect to sign an NDA.

It’s Anthony Coyle who has disclosed the information though right. Argo haven’t actually done anything wrong. These kind of meetings will happen all the time.

I’ve had basic dealings with a Plc before where I’ve had to sign an NDA so perhaps they missed a step there.

Who is Anthony Coyle? Forgive my ignorance but is he someone of significance?