RE: Interview3 Oct 2025 12:05
"i must say i think they looked nervous in the interview rather than bullish. As everyone says the AGM could be interesting this year."
Apart from Parker, who IMHO is a smooth operator shall we say, they always do and contrive to look bored out of their skulls as well.
As for the AGM there has always been talk of "fireworks": "awkward questions" etc etc and all that happens is the usual annual whitewash.
Agree with Shepster about the wider pharma community, essentially, losing interest, but unlike us not having to fork out over half a million bucks a year for a management team that drags us from one financial disaster to another and dangles mythical carrots to keep us interested.
Let's face reality just for once: we are years away from getting our "superdrug" to market (Yes we are!) and our one and only hope, albeit faint, is a complete take out by a company who can afford to progress without constant shareholder dilution. We've been down the licencing path which has been proven to be a complete waste of time.
Have a go if you wish- couldn't care less but like many LTH's on this Board getting just s teensy weensy p...ed off with this year on year quasi torpor.