Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
".....once SRA737 / SDC 1801 / 1802 are in P1/2 trials..."
Brighty, presumably you are looking 2 years hence, if then, based upon present progress and the complete absence of any news on the progress or otherwise of 737?
Yes Bailiff, but algos do only what they are programmed to do by, in this case rather po faced, individual (s) intent on making sure that readers are not "triggered" into emotional turmoil.
What a pathetic society we have become!
Yes, most interesting and bordering on being libellous but I doubt Petrofac would be bothered too much.
Most corporations are a tad "corrupt" in some way shape or form as is central government but just a few get caught and governments are teflon coated anyway. Harking back to something which reared its ugly head years ago and kept a few inept government bean counters employed for a few years achieves nothing.
(What was "the IT Project" I wonder and was it a major aspect of Petrofac's operations?)
...in freedom of speech, greatly under threat nowadays and I know there is much frustration about various aspects of the company, its stagnating/falling SP, "jam tomorrow" etc etc. but c'mon Chaps, hacking chunks off each other, especially behind the protection of anonymity, achieves absolutely nothing.
We're all in the same boat and reasoned, even very pointed, criticism is useful and constructive-pure mudslinging achieves the exact opposite.
GLA
While sharing the discontent with Parker's performance to date, including his urbane assurances at Q&A and AGM, we need to be careful what we wish for. IF he chose to throw up £58kpa and move on to pastures new, however unlikely, would it not send the wrong message to the market and depress the present woeful SP even further?
Just MHO
Contradict themselves.
First they say phasing out anything to do with weapons then few paras later:-
"Aviva is a significant investor in UK defence companies, with £600m invested in the sector’s equities, and we have no intention of changing this.”
Which?
"naked shorting" is illegal per EU regs legacy but there have been calls for it to be reinstated. However due to loopholes in the regs and paper/electronic trading systems it still happens.
Well researched post Brighty, but having opportunities is one thing: having a go-getting BoD is another completely.
We have had many years of always the bridesmaid never the bride. Let's hope we get to the altar with 1801/737 before too long and before the grim reaper starts to take more than a passing interest ( as he did with one of our number just recently "An unwelcome hug from the Grim Reaper" was the wording I think)
Silverfoil
"I loathe derivative products generally firstly because they are too complicated for an average human being to understand....."
The Headline on the cover of one of the last editions of a banking journal of about 40 years ago read
"Derivatives-does anyone know the real risks" or similar.
Plus ca change!!
Point well taken Guitarsolo.
I suppose what I was trying to say rather clumsily was, it is a dangerous game when companies partially owned by the man in the street, either directly or indirectly via pension fund investments, assume that they can start meddling in politics, an action which may well be ultra vires their M&AA and, in a roundabout way be a vehicle whereby the BoD can peddle their own personal opinions under the guise of company policy.