Member Info for VulcanBob

Hi Levi:

Firstly, an apology to all who use this Board. However, it is the only way that I can communicate with Levi. A `Twat` of the First Order got me banned from GLR a year or so ago, purely because I accurately criticised his comments on the GLR Board. No bad language at all, but purely pragmatic criticism. This person, as Levi knows, can`t stand ANYTHING that goes against his opinions and views. Simply, he is `always right`.

Now Levi, I don`t know if you have noticed on the GLR Board that Analytical has `disappeared`. Ha! He also did so 2-3 years ago . Then he was known as `Oiltap` and was dispatched (banned) with less than a moment`s notice. Well, he has vanished again - without even a `Goodbye`to his friends!

However, as with Oiltap last time, he has quickly resurrected himself on the GLR Board in a new guise as "JuniorLassonde".

Levi, I wonder if you could pen short something on the GLR Board such as "Oh, I see Ana is back. So "Junior", how long before we get plagued again with a constant plethora of your pointless blue links?".

I was in the approach to Heathrow this morn reading a pundit (investment) company's grading of GLR. The bottom grade was "Sucker" and there was GLR. Now, these companies are manned by professionals. I would suggest that there is a big difference between investors and pragmatists (ie the professional analysts)

The small(ish) investors would argue that GLR couldn't possibly buy a SUCKER investment, despite GLR's history over the last 5+years. They know best because, intrinsically linked with their opinion is their cash.

Ergo, the straightforward opinions of professional analysts must have got it wrong!

Now, I quote GLR here purely because I am typing away whilst being bumped and shoved by others waiting for their baggage.

My bottom line here (and you were wondering weren't you?) is what has all this got to do with XTR? My view is simple . . . XTR is moreso regarded as a SUCKER investment than is GLR.

.

My last was a very tongue-in-cheek comment Eastern! However, theoretically that 19P purchase would likely also incur a dealer`s charge of, say, £10 too. Thus, it would take much more than a 10 bagger to even break even!

On a serious note though, I don`t recall ANY of Bird`s adventures reaching a multiple of 10 for many a year. GLR, during its Concordia `hey-day`, managed a rapid rise of about about 800% some 8 years ago, which was then quickly followed by an equally rapid fall back to its lowly norm within about 3 months. Beyond that, Bird has managed to generate a lot of wishful thinking by his faithful investors but, for most, little or no financial success. As an example, have a look back 3-4 years ago on this board. Then, the vast majority of contributors would have poured scorn on anyone who would have predicted that XTR would be worth just 0.4P at the start of 2025 - (including me!). Any pragmatic bets around for Dec 2025?

I see that there has been a mad investor `gambling`the princely sum of 19P this morning. Eternal optimist with the current spread of 50%!

don`t know why those asterisks appeared against ****nal221`s `title` in my last! i am not an old-fashioned prude! let us see when i post this. ok gunner?!

****nal221: your "if cb had to pay out very large sum of £s to shareholders in a claim found against him". don`t want to disallusion you matey. but getting any money out of bird whilst he was living in dubai just wouldn`t happen.

Https://www.barchart.com/stocks/quotes/XTR.LN/opinion.

Terminal decline? Well, with the current spread around 40%, who on earth would buy?

Bearing in mind Bird`s general lacklustre performance, can anyone argue convincingly that XTR is NOT in terminal decline?

Well. XTR`s current share spread at 28.57% must be a record, even for Bird!

With a spread of 25%, I wonder who would want to have a dabble?

I presume you mean GLR? I don`t suppose that you managed your spring holiday after all!

Yes ant15 . . . . David Horgan would tell you that, in his opinion, "all is still to play for and far from finished". Rishi Sunak would tell you the same, albeit regarding the outcome of the General Election, and his future as a politician!

Play away? Like GLR eh?

Well said Martingirl!

Ricky: . . . . Can you name one on the AIM?

Iky: Your "It`ll come when its meant to come". . . . . . . or, to be accurate, more often it won`t! I have been around the AIM long enough to note that the majority of `mini-miners never actually do `come`, despite the plethora of hundreds of apparently `knowledgeable` researchers (aka `dreamers`)who spend their time on boards like this - ever optimistic, but never accepting the simple modus-operandi of the AIM and, in particular, the mini-miners. GLR is a case in point!

I am not referring to your recent article Analytical but one from the Lusaka Times a year or 2 ago (as I very briefly described in my message of 21:45 today}. Following the article which I had previously highlighted regarding from the Lusaka Times, you derided the article purely as `it had come from the Lusaka Times`. As I said, I will recover said article on my return to the UK.

I seem to recall that you seriouslyderided the Lusaka Times a couple of years ago Analytical.

Shareswotter: Your "It appears Mr Market thinks Colin is is going to p1ss the £15m up the wall!!"

I doubt very much that Bird will remain manage to remain Compos Mentis long enough to have much influence on the incoming payments!