Member Info for VINCE72

Suite of products. MSAR has been tested to death and proven to work, do your research. From power stations in Lithuania, to the Maersk trial it works.....yet 5 years( the time you say you first invested) is the time we've been waiting to get Morocco over the line for.....MSAR. Not BioMsar or BioMsar Zero..

A lot of us have been here for a decade or More and the money we have invested is Critical money. Money from inheritance, Bonuses, Overtime etc.....not playing around money because we've sold a buisness for 16 million quid and want a little bit of a gamble to spice things up a bit.

For most of us this make or break to create a bet life for ourselves and not have to grind away till 67.

When your 10 years in and seen your investment reduce from 40p to 1.9 come back and give all us peons some investment advice.

I agree HF14, it's pretty pathetic when on a public bulletin board you can't express a free opinion without being accused of crashing your investments, or having an agenda of trading.

Here's what I'm trashing if they want to call it that.

1) Any concrete tangible progress outside of testing in labs or minor testing at sites.

2) The constant Rhetoric of what is happening and what is going to happen, when reality says otherwise.

3) Trying to run before you can walk, looking at new projects, new iterations of products before we have even successfully completed one project and gotten a contract.

4) Constant fund raises believing this is the final one over the line.

Now of none of these things p#ss you off and you think anybody complaining of these things are derampers and traders then sorry but your critical thought processes need re-evaluating.

Blindly hoping that things are gonna turn out right, without critical evaluation is the investment strategy of a imbecile. Bottom line I'm here to get maximum return on my investment and having seen nothing but decline after decline year after year, if the like of SC, Indigo , PharroahRocher, Fyoz et want think that blind obedience and belief is warranted, fine you do that, I don't comment or care about your investment strategy. All I care about is my investment and from what I see it's been another investment that promises the world and have so far delivered nothing but sour milk.

Why should anyone sell out at a loss to appease the goons who don't like a different opinion. Like you are going to take the advice of a completely random Jeff on a bulletin board, especially who hide behind multiple names.

When anything JM says comes true and we get contracts, then I'll change mu opinion, but after 12 years of hearing the same crap, why shouldn't anybody be sceptical unless you are a true sycophant who believes the sky is green and the sea is pink if people tell you it's so.

I used to monkeymo but now completely astute to JM's BS.

JM tends to put this crap out when investors start to question the narrative, and as usual the usual suspects will pick it up and run with it.

Since when did common sense ever come into play when management decisions are being made, look at the stupidity of Maersk and Soren Toft is the ex CEO of Maersk, so just like Maersk, the Scandinavian model of messing people around carries on.

Https://theloadstar.com/msc-continues-to-order-new-box-ships-as-fleet-capacity-passes-six-million-teu/

Meanwhile, in line with decarbonisation efforts, shipowners have been looking at alternative fuels when commissioning newbuildings, and it appears that MSC, like several others, are inclined towards LNG, which has a proven supply base.

We can all take comfort in the fact that JM's mortgage and his kids university education is well taken care of...gives you a warm fuzzy feeling knowing somebody is a winner out of QED at your expense.

Makes me laugh at people who say they've been invested in QED for x amount of years, but still under estimate the time it takes for QED to do anything in a reasonable amount of time, whether that's testing or getting a trial done, never mind anything of magnitude such as collaboration contracts.

Https://shipandbunker.com/news/emea/296516-orsted-cancels-green-methanol-plant-project-in-sweden

Seems to me the shipping companies, are just green washing, first Shell, now this green methanol project, doesn't seem to be any appetite to expedite anything.

Https://shipandbunker.com/news/apac/250502-totalenergies-makes-first-b100-bunker-delivery-in-singapore

https://shipandbunker.com/news/apac/601464-swire-shipping-reports-successful-biofuel-trial

Meanwhile elsewhere people just getting on with it, while we still talk about a £ 1 party FFS

The Cepsa trial for Maersk involved project planning of 3 or 4 months and 6 or 7 months on installation, hopefully the feed lines are still in, so planning if it's at San Roque should really only take 6-7 months depending upon whether the feed lines still have integrity and don't need replacing, again if we get an agreement with Cepsa, 6-7 months hopefully from that point which still takes us well into nxt year . But gives us a consistent source of Residue which is essential for the economics of Msar/BioMsar to work at this stage until Biomass and Pyrolysis oils come into play.

Personally my theory is that the Morocco trial is key, They have the Bio feedstock sourced from Cargill, but no consistent source of Petroleum feed stock ( ie Vacuum Residue) which in order for this to be economically superior has to use Resid and not HFO on a long term basis( OK for the trial).

So the way I see it, successful Morocco trial gets Cepsa on board and a consistent long term source of Vaccum Resid which can service Antwerp and The Mediterranean via Cepsa's facilities ( Huelva, San Roque, whichever).

MSC will want a sealed guarantee of continuity of supply and so all bases must be covered, buying Vacuum Resid on the open market is a bit scanty I'd say.

But as usual, just a theory which is probably wrong, but it's my guess.

A piece of good news at last, been a long time coming, hoping the local power suppliers mean the Fuel oil powered stations that remain in Utah, of which Bloomington looks a good candidate even if it only does generate 10MW.

Https://shipandbunker.com/news/world/358922-hsfo-retains-position-as-top-bunker-grade-at-rotterdam-in-q2

This article alone, shows the green washing BS by these shipping companies and hence the position we are in...they talk a great talk, but have no incentive to change whatsoever unless they are forced to.

Have to wait and see how much of this involves us.

https://shipandbunker.com/news/world/876384-promoted-cepsas-second-generation-2g-biofuel-bunkers-are-meeting-the-demand-for-lower-carbon-fuels

I pointed out SulNox, Goodfuels and the FOWE technology all of which is doing well over a number of years and got rebuffed.....OK they aren't direct competitors but they are alternatives which are gaining momentum....whereas as we have waded through treacle every step of the way.

As for the e-mail reply, again a standard reply which we have known for months with the caveat "We Expect", well we've all been expecting but it hasn't happened so again is a bit of a cop out, we expect to still happen....until it doesn't.....so once again its wait and see and wait and wait.

Who needs to trash the investment, it's woeful lack of progress is doing that for itself.

This could be 000.1p and I wouldn't put another £1 into it .

Grow up