Member Info for VINCE72

Https://shipandbunker.com/news/emea/545850-peninsula-to-sell-sulnox-bunker-additives-to-yachts-in-gibraltar

Yeah, who needs to build a special.yacht, to make real time savings right now and undergo years of trials.

Https://splash247.com/msc-secondhand-splurge-nears-400-ships-in-four-years/

Fueled on HFO and VLSFO, so not in any rush to decarbonise are they.

Https://splash247.com/decarbonising-shipping-could-double-cost-of-transporting-goods-by-containers-dnv/

That’s roughly what the cost component is of using carbon fuel. These new fuels are going to be two or three times more expensive. So, potentially $2,000-3,000 will be the future fuel cost of moving a 40-foot container,” Nixon said.

Tell that to MSC who could have first mover advantage but are still f##king around , but are probably not gonna do anything until last minute, when they have to.

The in-group bias makes us think researchers in our own field are more intelligent than others. The shared information bias is why we keep discussing what everyone knows but fail to pay attention to information held only by a few people. We like to discover patterns in noise (apophenia). We think arguments are stronger if the conclusion seems plausible (belief bias).

So you can see why certain posters words are hung upon to somehow shine light in the darkness.

Oh and chuck in a good measure of Sunk Cost fallacy for good measure.

Motivated cognition, It makes us believe positive outcomes are more likely than they really are.Along with confirmation bias, is why certain posters essays are loved because they wax lyrical on what wil happen, is going to happen and should happen......hasn't.

Https://shipandbunker.com/news/emea/706262-cruise-firm-nclh-takes-on-biofuels-from-cepsa-at-barcelona

While Crownos points out the facts perfectly, the reality is that shipping companies are opting for these more polluting, less efficient fuels. Because infrastructure is there, it's the easy option, not having to go through testing, intermittent supply and ticks the boxes of CO2 reduction in the eyes of the un-educated for the most part public, especially the politicians and can tie in long term contracts at cheaper rates.

Like MSC said, there is no one stop solution, so LNG maybe a goto at the moment while infrastructure exists, If and When the tripartite agreement goes ahead then Biofuels will also make up a proportion of the mix as Infrastructure rolls out.

Https://cyprusshippingnews.com/2024/08/19/methane-slip-being-eliminated-as-lng-uptake-accelerates/

Today, 2-stroke diesel cycle engines account for approximately 75% of the LNG-fuelled vessel order book. These engines have effectively eliminated slip already. For low-pressure engine technologies where methane slip remains an issue, manufacturers have already cut the levels of slip from low-pressure 4-stroke engines by more than 85% over the past 25 years. It is worth noting that methane slip has been eradicated for the similar LNG dual-fuel engine technologies used in the heavy-duty vehicle sector. The science is clear, the technologies exist, and engineering will soon solve the problem.

looking for a quick return......been invested 12 years. and kept putting money in every fund raise because i looked at it as an investment. never sold, never traded..and i have contingency plans if it does go tits up. so wrong, but other people have bought in at high price and are stranded and resentful as well as me.

as for your sympathy wipe your face with it, because it's full of it. if jm told you to put your hand in the fire idiots like you would ask which one.

as for asimpleinvestor, never trust a pie eater, 16 million my **** probably lives in platts bridge and worked at heinz.

Https://www.offshore-energy.biz/msc-continues-ordering-spree-with-up-to-18-new-lng-dual-fuel-boxships/

Looks to me that MSC have found a particular direction they want to go

In alignment with its net-zero commitment by 2050, MSC has been a strong advocate of LNG as a marine fuel. Soren Toft, the firm’s CEO, said that MSC’s fleet renewal strategy includes 100 dual-fuel vessels. The shipowner also joined SEA LNG coalition, with the aim of collaborating with the organization on exploring the prospects of bio-LNG, particularly renewable synthetic LNG.

Guy thinks he's Ronnie Pickering. Whatever story about your family circumstances you have elaborated has just been negated by this BS, so now your whole persona is now tainted as result. Another green bar to add to the pile

Who goes on a public bulletin board and spills out a life story of how much they are worth, how they got it, how it's invested and what it's for. Genuinely empathise that it's for your daughter and very admirable and noble, but at the end of the day that is your personal life and shouldn't be advertised on here where Genuinely shady people who are traders and boiler room types inhabit.

Like HF14 pointed out they were on the last points for MSC in December last year and for the Asian refinery for the past 6 months....so are these the last points or the last, last points

Thinking about it asimpleinvestor, you could have easily approached JM during one of the fund raises and offered to put in 1 million to fund the company on more than one occasion and be truly invested in the outcome which you so obviously believe will happen soon.

Some of us asimpleinvestor will be looking at a fraction of that 16 million you already have, to give us not a luxurious retirement, buying lambo's and Rolex watches and all that crap. But not having to worry about bills and affording simple luxuries that give piece of mind and contentment.

Whatever you do with your millions is of no concern to me either, gamble 1 million or all 16, but you have bought in at ultra low prices and have no authority to give advice on an investment where the majority of people have been here through think and thin, multiple fund raises and many disappointments only to see their investment 50-80 % down.

Good one HaggisSavilleChequeRow.....fake. Rich one coming from you,

Yes I have voice my opinions, only to be called a deramper, a trader and having an agenda.

So you think if I believe these things I shouldn't be invested, so you think I should sell at a considerable loss just to appease people who don't like pertinent points because it offends their investor belief.

Quadrise may well succeed beyond our wildest dreams, but then again the success may be modest.

How many times after Maersk and KSA do people have to be taught a lesson that nothing is written in stone. That MSC may well have explored the possibility of BioMsar and are coming to the conclusion that it's not for them ( not saying that is the case, but it's a possibility investors have to keep in mind, we thought Maersk was guaranteed didn't we.).

To not ask these questions and put them out their for people to ponder and debate isn't getting a full evaluation of the whole picture.

Like I said my investment strategy is my strategy and I am not selling until I get back to parity or a modest profit at least, you lot look after you, and I'll look after me. At the end of the day I will never meet you people, so your opinion about me being a trader or should sell up and move on is irrelevant.

Suite of products. MSAR has been tested to death and proven to work, do your research. From power stations in Lithuania, to the Maersk trial it works.....yet 5 years( the time you say you first invested) is the time we've been waiting to get Morocco over the line for.....MSAR. Not BioMsar or BioMsar Zero..

A lot of us have been here for a decade or More and the money we have invested is Critical money. Money from inheritance, Bonuses, Overtime etc.....not playing around money because we've sold a buisness for 16 million quid and want a little bit of a gamble to spice things up a bit.

For most of us this make or break to create a bet life for ourselves and not have to grind away till 67.

When your 10 years in and seen your investment reduce from 40p to 1.9 come back and give all us peons some investment advice.