Member Info for VINCE72

thanks i appreciate that akhm, but sick death of other clowns accusing me of trolling, deramping, trading , talking it down blah blah...yes i moan....but i want qed to succeed and am properly ****ed when it isn't...and hasnt

Prove any of that clown...a boy in a man's body who has to hide behind multiple identities to get his points across, who has cross conversations with himself to give the impression people agree with him and has to post hundreds of times a month to keep his narrative going.....you really are a good.. BRIAN/ SAVILLE/HAGGIS/STOPCHEQUE

I don't think for one minute that MSC or Morrocco will drop anytime soon.l, im hoping it will all be resolved before year end, but I am hopeful for Panama....at the end of the day I really don't give a toss what people think I am .

I know I have been invested in QED since 2013, I have been involved in every fund raise and never traded a share...because I generally don't know or care how to trade...

Im frustrated to FCUK that what is being said and what is happening in reality doesn't match and I just want resolution...

So either believe or don't believe....if you don't like what say....just filter I don't give a toss.

Awww Brian, Saville, Haggis, Cheque coming from somebody who's posted 485 times in a month, 128 of which are QED ....who are you to talk mush.

Don't align yourself with them. They're moaners. You're a shorter. Significant difference.

And you are a Sanctimonious , Narcissistic Twt.

Thete's probably more in that thread headline,than we give it credit for.

Https://shipandbunker.com/news/world/502969-quadrise-emulsion-fuel-trials-in-antwerp-delayed-amid-agreement-hurdles

that's true akhm, but my point is, around 2020 and imo we were all so ****y and arrogant believing msar at the time would be in service because if its environmental and financial benefits, then biomsar came along and strengthend the case even more....we dismissed outright that these exotic fuels would ever get off the ground, never mind be actually used....but here they are stealing a march on our wonderfuel.....

now this maybe a tortoise and hare situation and we all know which we are ....

Unless you thought it meant the two specific shipping lines mentioned in the article...I wasn't....I meant shipping companies in general with a collective They're.

Https://gcaptain.com/methanol-and-ammonia-now-ready-as-zero-emission-shipping-fuels-industry-report-finds/

The report highlights methanol’s rapid progression, with more than 60 methanol-capable vessels already in operation, 300 more on order, and bunkering available at approximately 20 ports.

Ammonia is approaching proof of concept as a marine fuel, with engine tests suggesting it can reduce tank-to-wake emissions by up to 95%.

The first ammonia-powered vessels have been successfully piloted, engine testing is nearing completion, and bunkering trials are underway.

Full rollout on these so called inferior fuels are far closer than Msar/BioMsar.

So Indigo...yes ...they are.

I agree with you on your bullet points SC..wev e discussed this ad infinitum over the years, but the headlines are filled with What these major players are doing right now, they are actually using Ammonia, actually using Methanol,....but they are being used....our fuel is being championed and discussed about its potential.....but until somebody actually decides to use it commercially we'll just keep turning circles

Https://shipandbunker.com/news/apac/830336-mol-and-itochu-to-collaborate-on-singapore-ammonia-bunkering-in-2027

You see my point of view is this...that all these fuels which wr debated about around IMO 5 long years ago...which we all thought wouldn't gain traction due to cost, infrastructure, polluting characteristics etc are now.....gaining traction.

And our fuel which benefits economically and environmentally and has been proven time and again is still being Tested, still being debated and still waiting for executives to decide.....WHY..

These stories about Ammonia, Methanol, Goodfuels, LNG etc etc etc fill the headlines and all we have are delays, and excuses....that is my frustration...if MSC and Morrocco are so dambed keen why the constant years delays.

Any credible discussion on a bulletin board allows alternative points of views and possible contingency, once again if somebody has an alternative point of view to balance out the over exuberance, it immediately attacked as Trolling, then what kind of a discussion board is it, with no discussion.

Now I dont want to get into a slanging match , but I say that people should be aloud to post whatever they want and if you don't like it either

A) FILTER

B) SCROLL PAST

C) DEBATE..

I don't always attack people's positive posts, most times I scroll past, but when I post what my thoughts are at that time.....and they do change on the information available and people then start getting personal .....I get personal back..

You haven't done that FYOZ so im not getting nasty...just saying for balance a discussion board has to allow everyone 's point of view.....

Also remember that the Financial Director said we would have money coming in from Morocco and other projects...that now is on very shaky ground....so expect another cap in hand fund raise nxt year, which if MSC, and Morrocco haven't been signed and completed will be very undersubcribed .. they really need to be more aggressive and just say...are these projects GO OR NO GO......we have a head if marine fir pity's sake with considerable and respected maritime experience....what is she bringing to the table 2 days a week apart from the odd lecture here and there.

Yes we've had a successful trial as far as we can interpret,but we've had successful trials before, Lithuania was a very successful trial, Msar won awards and lots of milestones were proven.....but they opted for cheaper Russian Gas.

Morrocco, the pilot trial was successful, but they wanted an industrial trial, and that was successful and guess what they want another industrial trial, which has taken over a year and counting despite JM saying that a new agreement had been signed to fast track the trial.....and the equipment has being laying idle for months now waiting for the OEM to make a move

So while Soarkle is a success as far as we know, you have to keep your feet on the ground, because the usual suspects run away with it and ramp it to oblivion...once the results are out and they say we are in active negotiations with Sparkle and other possible users , then the time for those scenarios begin to take shape....until then im being pragmatic about it.

Sorry that should be Cargill to side test it alongside MSC...this kind of situation cant keep going on indefinitely.

Again could they be delaying for more information, for example how about information on the MAN engine from Soarkle, the impacts of the IMO EGM in October...a pause before making a final decision....more info means a better decision....but its upto the Board to get to tough and actually say ...IS THIS GO OR NO GO... good point about why Cargill cant sure test it....

Once again apologies for the fat fingered spelling mistakes, no glasses again.

If think about it, lots of the senior staff at the lawyers and at MSC are probably on Holiday, and with so much going on with the upcoming IMO vote for carbon levies in Oct, with the Dinald threatening to veto it as its unfavourable tothe USA with regards to LNG and Biofuels...its either been paused till Q4 till staff return fully and to see what impact these IMO rules have to MSC....so as long as they can get it signed off for year end and trial start in Q1 2026, I'll settle for that providing we get Panama and Morocco over the line by the AGM...

Just like Maersk, MSC have been virtual signalling on the the Marine World stage saying we are doing this and we are doing that to mitigate Climate change....we have been a vanity project to MSC....the lack of advertisement apart from the 2022 sustainability report says it all really....I think this will be quietly kicked into the long grass..

As for Morocco well....again we are waiting on the OEM to give approval....how Effing long does that take if the client is interested....they could speed this along if they wanted....but the OEM is helping us to find new customers.....BS

Sparkle power is a small ray of light, I was wrong on that score and hold my hands up on that one, but it certainly won't open the door to KSA....that along with Kueait is dead.

I think the statement about MSC is very telling, AM is very passive and is still sticking to the No news is Good news mantra....

I think we are at a critical point....either MSC have paused to reevaluate and making a final decision before proceeding or they are slowly letting go of the idea of using MSAR....