Member Info for VINCE72

I specifically said that based on the times given in the DT article by Jason Miles of having the MMU fitted by the end of the year and commercial volumes in Jan.

Stock Chump reading his own Book again...clown

Well by my reckoning in order for the schedule JM mentioned in the DT, we have at the very latest until Oct 31st to get these signed, thinking that the MMU takes 8 -10 weeks to install....so let's see him good he is

I think its healthy to show some skepticism, after all Andy Morrison and Linda Sorensonnwhere championed in the same way and what have they achieved to date.

His first test is to get these agreements over the line ASAP, so the latest timeline is achieved

Like has been said, seems like a good appointment on paper....let's see if we start moving in the right direction..

Market seems unimpressed....understandably.

Https://www.seanews.co.uk/maritime/imo-net-zero-framework-shipping-enters-a-new-era-of-global-climate-regulation

The fear is that shipping could end up greenwashing with unsustainable biofuels, undermining climate goals while technically complying with IMO rules. This places enormous weight on the forthcoming lifecycle assessment guidelines, which must integrate sustainability safeguards to avoid locking the industry into high-risk fuels.

Like I said earlier the trail of the glycerol in Cargill's biofuel chain has to fully comply under Red 3 Marpol Annex 6 and is probably taking its time...

As the shipping industry prepares for October’s pivotal IMO meeting, one thing is certain: the era of voluntary pledges is over. Shipping is entering the age of binding global climate regulation.

This IMO EGM is going to have to focus minds....and ultimately cement decisions.

Ooh look who's back after a few days hiding in the shadows...gets called out for being a fake, just like asimpleinvestor, disappears while it goes quiet and turns up again.... good ole reliable StockChump.

If QED lock in agreement with MSC for commercial supply and Quadrise do the same with Cargill for glycerine supply ...I.e a 5 yr commercial deal with MSC and 5 yr supply deal with Cargill..

I mean let's say we get Moeve( Cepsa ) onboard...don't we go through the long drawn out negotiations with MSC and Cepsa...when Cepsa can just supply the Residue at San Roque and glycerine from Huelva straight to QED and we then just sell onto MSC.

Thanks for elaborating in your thoughts jackg...when you look from that perspective, their never really was a need to have an agreement between Cargill and MSC.....Cargill and QED and QED and MSC...As long as Cargill can verify their source of glycerine and its allocation under the Red 3 sustainability certification under Marpol Annex 6 for Biofuels, then there is no uncertainty in quality and source of supply, and if Mac2 are supplying the HFO, thats straightforward.

Looking at it having a agreement between MSC and Cargill is convoluted and unnecessary.

I saw through asimpleinvestor right from the beginning, announcing on the board how he sold his buisness for millions and using the money to secure his daughters future as she had a disability, had 100's of millions of shares in Quadrise and how his revenge on somebody who had crossed him had splashed across Wigan News ,when he got his Chums from the John Bull Chop shop ( a notorious Bikers pub in Wigan for those who don't know) to tell this chap, to play fair cricket or else.

And yet this great buisness mind invest for his daughters future in companies like...VAST RESOURCES OR the suspended PENNPETRO ENERGY...hardly Warren Buffet intellect is it.

Also we have contradictory posts such as

SemaphorRed - Not you, but it does suggest I'm living rent free in your head. There are a few posters on these boards and I have never mentioned my holding on here as it fluctuates too frequently to be easily pinned down.

And yet contradictorily

Anybody who needs tell people how many shares they have...well thats as shallow as they come"

I enjoy sharing how many shares I have in an investment because it feels like a game. I like waiting a few months or even a couple of years before mentioning it again, just to see someone accuse me of lying when the number has changed. It’s amusing how some people think investing is static, as if once you buy shares, you never sell or buy more. They just can’t seem to grasp how dynamic investing really is.

I could go on, but just a few tidbits from our resident Charlie Munger from Platts Bridge..

As you can see asimpleinvestor nobody believes a word you say, so whatever you are trying to achieve has failed and anything you say from now on will be ignored or blocked..

Just like StockChump.....I REMEMBER EVERYTHING...with muppets like you.

Good luck with Pennpetro .....LOL

People have accused me over the years of nefarious actions...but when I moan and complain its about execution and delivery...not because I doubt the technology.

Those who were around during the Maersk trial and tead the summary of the interim Lono knows this is complete garbage...

Like I said all his other BS didnt sit well with me when I first heard it....MSC know all they need to know and still decided to proceed forwards.....whatever is holding this up, I'll wait for QED to give news ..

Again, not having it...when we first heard from asimpleinvestor he piled in with his m8llions, he was uber optimistic and bullish, never mentioned any of this in his investment case...no suddenly he has a hard copy from Wartsilla and the reason the trial was stopped was wear and tear....so by that admission alone someone is lying... so provide that evidence asimpleinvestor....back your up your claim

I...don't need to...because all relevant information is out in public...and all commercial information wouldn't be released to private Investors who work for Heinz....

Lots of alarm bells, particularly when he claims to have sold his buisness for millions ( in Wigan...yeah right) and is investing for his daughters future.

Who 8n their right mind would invest in a pre commercial compsntly, with millions in the bank when you can collect an easy 5% per annum through other means and be secure for life... great buisness acumen that...

Stick to Pea Wet and Baby's Yed...

Nope im not buying that one bit...that Wartsilla would send a detailed copy of a commercially sensitive document to a random Jeff from Platts bridge...this is about a credilous as being a millionaire and tearing up the John Bull Chop house, it being splashed over Wigan News...

If that was the case , Maersk and Wartsilla inspection crew wouldn't have been satisfied with the 1500 hrs and issued a partial LONO..

A good post asimpleinvestor and I totally agree, but with caveat....thats not what Quadrise have been selling to us....a lot of us remember the trials with Maersk and its several years from Development to trial...only at the final hurdle to be told no ( Having Soren Skou saying they didnt want mini refineries on.board was the first sign it wasn't going to happen)

But the story that We've been told of late ....or at least insinuated is....this time its different...MSC are genuinely interested and are moving heaven and earth to make it happen..

Msar/Biomsar is never going to be pushed mainstream like LNG or Ammonia...but with MSC on board you don't get a better brand Ambassador than that....

Near Final Form isn't a lawyer issue...its a Buisness issue...something between Cargill and MSC they cant agree over.

Anyways I did say it was time for another shipping conference...just hope they can beat Bud Darr to the buffet

I bet even industry is tired of listening to what Quadrise is doing to change the shipping industry..never mind beleaguered investors.

Shipping companies like Maersk et al didnt hesitate to embrace VLSFO and ULSFO despite knowing full well Lubricity and Cat Fines problems, which have caused untold engine damage ....yet still they use it....Msar/ BioMsar has been used across enough engine types and in different applications ( Marine, Industrial,Power) to prove there are no unknown issues.

Https://splash247.com/shippings-fuel-transition-hits-a-supply-side-reality-check/

This widening gap between capacity and use highlights both the scale of industry commitment and the urgent need for fuel producers and infrastructure developers to accelerate supply to match the fleet’s readiness,” the report states.

With the number of alternative-fuelled vessels in operation set to almost double by 2028, shipping is approaching what DNV claims is a “fuel transition tipping point” – sending a strong demand signal to fuel producers and related industries to speed up their progress.

It's absolutely garbage like this, that shows clearly that Rhetoric and Reality don't match.....tell MSC that.

Im going to give them, till the end of the year like they said, to get this moving...otherwise in the New Year after 12 years of being in this im contemplating selling up and moving on, it's been one big tissue of Boll#cks from start to finish for me....this whole thing is beginning to smell like Maersk all of again...of being messed about as a plaything.

Be careful MadDog you might upset Chumpstock for volte facing. Something some have been saying for months, how the Rhetoric and reality don't match up...