For what it's worth1 May 2024 19:28
This section of their defence interested me :-
"Exsig failed at an unacceptable rate due to design and/or manufacturing defects and therefore lacked robustness", Mr Heppinstall told the court.
He said that Exsig tests were analysed in seven NHS laboratories, six of which found a failure rate higher than 10% - including four reporting a failure rate of 25%.
No mention was made of the 7th and I hope we pick up on this in court.
Could it be the 7th Lab were better trained and therefore their results would have given a much higher success rate.
These surely would have been identical tests provided by us.