The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from WS Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
This section of their defence interested me :-
"Exsig failed at an unacceptable rate due to design and/or manufacturing defects and therefore lacked robustness", Mr Heppinstall told the court.
He said that Exsig tests were analysed in seven NHS laboratories, six of which found a failure rate higher than 10% - including four reporting a failure rate of 25%.
No mention was made of the 7th and I hope we pick up on this in court.
Could it be the 7th Lab were better trained and therefore their results would have given a much higher success rate.
These surely would have been identical tests provided by us.
That just happened to be a one off Wilson.
Never sold another one and although greatly enjoyable over 20 years and a lot of success, I wouldn't want to calculate the plus and minus columns.
A bit like Novacyt, but hopeful the Plus column may outweigh the Minus one in the coming weeks.
Hi Wilson,
I notice you said Mrs Jefford is hearing our case. Is It Nerys Jefford by any chance.
Unbelievably I owned horses with her and her KC husband Paul Darling backed in the mid 90s.
We sold this one to Sheik Mohammed for 200k.
https://www.racingpost.com/profile/horse/482346/peculiarity/form
You are in the wrong place to ask that question.
We are obviously here as we were all sucked in to where this company was going during the pandemic and hoped the company would go places with the cash it made.
The opposite has happened and the DHSC legal case has been like a lead balloon for the share price.
The BOD offer us no insight into where the company is or going. Just salad when they must speak to their shareholders.
On the plus side, we have one purchase that looks inspired in Yourgene.
But the fate of this company is the 24th June when the court case begins.
But LW do your own research.
A learned man such as a doctor, should know to put a question mark at the the end of your title.
As it reads as a statement.
Petty I know, just couldn't resist it.
We get so many meaningless post form him.
I think you talk a lot of sense Harchris. But possible not on this occasion.
The Post Office Scandel was only small fry in the scale of things.
If the media or an election campaign wants to expose the case it it could become big news.
As the Post office scandal highlights it., no one likes an underdog to be "kicked in the balls"
I have just given up my Member's Badge at Newmarket.
It is no longer for lovers of horse racing, but a place where stag and hen party have thronged over the past ten years with no interest in racing and with the one aim of downing as much alcohol as possible which leads to loud loutish behaviour.
Good luck to Mandy in her new environment.
Sorry for the rant.
Thank you Harchris for re-posting GLT's post.
I cannot see a senario that we would go to court without a good chance of winning.
Would the BOD earning great salaries risk their jobs if they thought we could lose. They are more likely to settle, keeping enough cash in the company to continue as they have done for the past two year.
Just my thoughts.
Hope your better soon ValJu.
But can't see how bringing testing back will make a difference, unless you are told to stay home if positive.
My daughter and her partner in Australia went to a large company seminar and over half the attendees have had the same symptoms as you are experiencing and worse.