Member Info for Uncanny

Good point DShox, why such a small funding? 401?

401 JV still waiting for.

Well the silver lining being we have another £1mn I guess to further the pipeline and thise that sold in 3’a buying back.

You can’t buy anything?

So where is everyone?

GP you have circa the same number of shares that I do and rather settle at a discount to full claim than have to wait a further +18 months. I agree with OOC "a bird in the hand is worth etc..." As we have seen, as confident as we maybe after (if) annulment, anything is possible with litigation cases!

Don't worry GP, I think we should get a permanent stay of costs which will sit very uneasy with ROI. Discussions of an OOC are maybe being discussed behind ROI closed doors. I am confident after reading again our annulment application of winning the case.

Yes, but doesn't mean a permanent stay of costs necessarily.

I'm not sure GP, but they still have stay of costs for the time being.

Announced now.

GP, I agree. Lets nor forget that a stay of costs during annulment is the norm, not the exception.

I think it will be same as ISA's but securely email them.

I think it will be same as ISA's but securely email them.

Is a decision meant to be announced tomorrow?

Jamessss FYI from Hargreaves Lansdown: "Dear Mr You can still trade Churchill Mining Shares within an ISA on the NEX Exchange and your holdings are both secure. You will still hold the ISA tax benefits of your holding in the ISA regardless of any compensation, if it is paid out. I trust this to be in order. Should you have any further queries please do not hesitate to contact us..."

Don't you understand that they won't resume trading which is why they moved to NEX. Fill or kill situation! OOC, takeover or 100% loss.

Now that would be nice followed by a quick OOC!

Good move by CHL IMHO. Stop the costs mounting of AIM listing, remove the suspension burden, continue with low cost option on NEX, shareholders interests continue. Then in the RNS a big hint on still protections on takeover, resume listing perhaps after stay of costs where a decision is to be made in c. 2 weeks. I agree with GP that CHL / CC have a strong game plan which should transpire in a OOC / takeover as a face saving exercise for ROI. GLA

The OXS thread on ADVFN still going after it delisted

I agree with the ADVFN post. Slim chance on stay of costs for OOC, good chance of OOC if annulled and i'd be gobsmacked if ROI let it go on any further but stranger things have happened here! Interesting reading on ADVFN by those in communicado with DQ that ICSID have in some cases closed proceedings early on the first grounds of annulment been accepted, with other cases going the full term. So.. my ideal is a stay of costs, early closure on the annulment bu the adhoc committee and then lets see where the road lies for ROI!