Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
goldtrig, Its not wise to question the regulator. Like many on here he has a case of severe tunnel vision. Wish ODX would get a move on so I can get the hell out of here and never look back.
Good post Tonic. Its a painful BB this one to read but I agree ODX should go way up from here. I've been fully loaded in AVCT since last March and decided to sell a part of another non covid medical share which I've held for 12 years to invest in here. It's quite obvoius to me that rises will happen here over the coming weeks. GL
Hi Poppysdad, To answer your question, its because in general the LFT has been given bad press, by the likes of deeks & co. My take on it is the previous bad LFT results are because the brain tickler innova tests were not done properly by the person being tested. What avacta has is an LFT using magic Affirmirs with no need to swab the brain just up the nose will do. I really hope the Avacta test will do 100/100 thats the dream.
This is an awful lot of nasty's that can be adapted using our product to get better results. https://www.biokit.com/innovation-assays-detail?scrollto=caec06575-d792-40a4-85d9-a2b63bd391e8
DaProphet, calling strangers scum on the internet just shows your sheer desparation.
There isn't a BA contract goldrig, one of the positive posters said 'BA will be all over this' on the same day as BA announced yesterday it will be using an LFT, that was then jumped on as if BA has signed a contract for this companies offering. It was somewhere around £10 next week, FTSE100 listing, CEO not selling posts. GL
You guys are a hoot, this BB is comedy gold.
Maybe the Huff was taking about the new super test with mologic, they just got it wrong. So many positives here. Not sure why Sandj is getting so much airtime it was only a few weeks ago that poster was wanting the SP to go down so they could sell at a loss for tax reasons.
Sure Quickdraw. This one of many is my favorite when you were crowing on the AVCT BB untill one of the posters here corrected you again.........There are many examples, you can't even get the basics right.
Quickdraw, I think you've got your numbers mixed up wrt AVCT's S&S.
You said: "The Innova test had a sensitivity of 66.7% at CT of <25 which looks like a truer representation, than Avacta's results based against CT of 26 (high viral loads)"
In fact, the higher the Ct, the smaller the viral load, and vice versa. So AVCT did their tests appropriately and in fact their sensitivity of 97% related to Ct <26 (half in the range 22-26).
Quickdraw you seem to have a habit of needing to be corrected. Yesterday was a good one.
I had a look at some other covid realated shares this morning, its frankly astounding how PI's get tunnel vision whist only focused on their product yet they were all discussing AVCT. It's scary how little they know about what they have invested in. Great part of the story here this morning hopefully with the larger scale test AVCT can nail the 100%, now that would be great for the whole world.
gkb47, I don't tend to use the filter very much, just 1 person on that list as I like to hear others POV, but with you its the same repetitive moan 100's of times. Shock horror the goal posts move during an international deadly pandemic, all Covid related stocks are the same.