Member Info for Troutisout1

Addicknt,

I was saying that on the day of the subscription, that the wording suggested more than one investor, I got shot down by so many posters who felt it was more positive to spread the narrative that it was one single investor. I also pointed out that with that narrative the bashers would use the lack of a TR1 as a negative (we saw that yesterday). The problem with herd, is they are sheep...

Well FAB was my only stock not blue earlier, with 4 trades for most of the day, perked up a bit before the close though, any reason???

You don't need to pay out money, just filter them, ignore them and do not ever make reference to them again, if everyone did that, no problems...

It sort of needs to 3x just to get back to where it was before the placing RNS.

Well it seems there is a battle between the sellers and buyers, the patient buyers waiting for the sells to drop the price. MMs throwing their price about and as wide as possible, which suggests no-one is that too sure.

Personally think this is a great place to accumulate...

Well those two delayed buys make the trade volume a little different, with over twice as many buys than sells now...

You can see from the rapid reversal from 11p offered to bid, that the moves are on small volume and MMs are trying to fish, but nervous about getting snagged up by any large buys.

It's tomorrow and Wednesday.

You are not Charlotte are you???

Chavi,

Not entirely sure you are right, the RNS is due to the dilution from the first placing issue (66m shares), they have sold some but only 3.4m (which was just over 1% of the previous issue).

I have seen a lot of other companies suffer at the moment, if they have cash on their books and a good business model then there are some bargains out there to be had. I believe Fusion is definitely one of them.

When we get the 7am RNS the MMs won't wait at 11.5p for everyone to buy, they will whip the offer up and make everyone pay for those shares. So use the opportunities given, for your own benefit.

The drops just allow some to buy/add on the cheap, there is no volume and MMs playing at dropping the SP lower each time, but they get hit and go back up again. I personally think we are due some news shortly and with the end of year 7 working days away am looking forward to some positive newsflow coming our way.

Thank goodness they got the placing away before Iran, at times like this you need to remember the fundamentals that made you invest and not on a couple of posters who until a few weeks ago were uber bullish. They have cash, they have the platforms, they have all the potential still, just a lull in news together with jittery markets allowing the MMs to move about on nothing.

TRENCH,

The Company have done that, as they don't have to have Ian Bagnall as a major shareholder at under 3%, They have done that to show the dilution, but have no idea what they may have bought in the market. If Doc and Bagnall had notified the Company of a change then they would have to issue an RNS.

Things getting messy here.

As for Richard Edwards, Laura must know him as he sweeps in to shells and lowly valued shares, takes some stock, gets on the BoD, awards himself more stock, takes part in discounted placings, comes up with a 'great new idea' then exits with his profits, normally chucked in his Wife's ISA

It's 5% now to requisition an AGM, so Doc has enough even if diluted, but would just join forces with Bagnall if needed.

What it probably does is delay things as the requisition request would have to be amended /renewed with the new percentages on.

This all leads to mayhem within the Company and it's client base, a long dragged out defence will harm the business, at the moment looks like a saucepan and a fire, no winners here...

You will find that when you are greedy you often end up feeling sick, Leigh Creek is a nightmare and best left to someone else, that they have managed to extract some return on it is amazing. if they can get Cuprum to do the deal, that is brilliant.

As any long term holder here will tell you, the new BoD have done really well by just concentrating on CRL, the old BoD tried to juggle too many things, including Hanns Camp, which all sounded great, but would be impossible to take all of them forward without huge deep pockets and large potential losses along the way.

Just concentrate on Redmoor!

Panman, I really hope not!!!

Selling LCCM with a carry, is the best bit of business you can do there. If Cuprum can't do it then just mothball it, they must concentrate on Redmoor.

I am a married investor...

Slurm,

That is because the large investor is new, you don't welcome existing investors.

Why would they say led by, if there was only one investor? why would they state subscriptions, if there was only one investor?

It doesn't really matter, but there are a lot of blinkers on here and if there turns out to be more investors and the new investor took say £3m, there won't be a TR1 and then we get the recriminations from other posters for that.

That is because they have made a big play abut the single investor approaching the Company. It looks to me that others also subscribed to the raise and my comments are because some here were talking about a TR1 and that would be definite if only one investor, but I reckon that existing large investors (from the previous raise) were given the chance to invest at the same price, hence the 'led by' and 'subscriptions' wording in the RNS

DeBRE,

Those are my thoughts as well, as I am not sure how much they can accelerate the upcoming drill programme. As well as the infill drilling, what other things are needed to be done to get to the PFS? Are these able to be accelerated with extra funds?

Will they need permissions, planning,etc) to start on the Duchy land and or can some of the work be done straight away?