Member Info for Troutisout1

The RNS seems to have big omission, they have made no mention of Jim Millen being removed from the board with immediate effect, surely they could have got that right, start as you mean to go on, now where is the correctly worded RNS???

But Laura, you never take into account anything they spend in the time between the date of the figures and today, far likely around £500-600k, maybe a little less.

Laura2022,

Where do you get £6m in cash from???

If you can't get the basic facts right, what good is the rest of your message?

Theta,

I think you are undervaluing the size of the trial , 500 volunteers! all the lab work, this will be closer to £30m than £20m. We will never know the true amount as it is obviously not going to be disclosed, but look at the volunteer numbers these are the metric that the costs are worked on....

This is at least a two year trial (note the comment about most of the revenue being in 2026 and 2027, so likely some in 2028), however this is a real big HCT and there will be now two sets of deposits put down so the cash situation will have improved immensely, this really has shifted the dial and anyone looking to book an HCT trial with HVO will now have to get in soon or have to wait a considerable amount of time to get their's done...

Wow 500 volunteers that's over 3 times the size of the recently announced Traws HCT and with all the lab work as well, Great news!!!

As I said earlier, there is nothing positive from either option for long term shareholders...

King Homer,

You seem to miss that if Doc and others were offered the placing at 0.3p they would have probably taken it, they weren't, so they then hatched the requisition plan (the placing would have been touted to placees well before the announcement, hence the SP drop).

It's all well and good trying to say the BoD didn't get the best price, but if Doc and others were involved they would have happily paid 0.3p and sold it on the next spike(s) like in previous times.

Investors are greedy and don't want to pay a reasonable price, they want it cheap as possible, that is why I said PYC should have raised earlier, before it became obviously too late to get best price. The new placing price was purely to avoid a vote on nominal value of shares, to combat the requisition. Doc, Ian and others did not take part in the Placing as some have stated, they took part in the Open Offer element. I am sure investors in the 0.4p placing, were the same as the 0.3p placing, but upped the price to try and stop the 'golden' goose from being killed off...

Still can't see a good end result for long term shareholders at the moment, from either option...

Such conspiracy theories Laura...You really are becoming more desperate as each day goes by...

My vote was against the requisitioners appointments and also no to Jim Millen. That way they will have to come to the compromise that King Homer talks about...

Sometimes being a Director through a really tough period is much harder than when you are flying and everything is positive. I can't blame the Directors for what was really a Trump decision to have an anti-vaxxer in charge of Health.

The fact that they have acquired wisely and used this period to bring these two companies in (Germany especially as there were fundamental differences in how they approached everything) and now we are set to reap the benefits.

It isn't too late to jump aboard again...

Sweeping out the day traders and loose hands, this will build from here over the next few sessions.

We should see double figures, where it then may pause for ILiad news.

Theta, when did they announce a £40m orderbook in January?

King Homer,

I think we agree on a lot, but for some reason you were stuck behind someone else's rhetoric for so long.

They have enough beds, the staff levels have been reduced as you would expect when the HCTs dried up, the best scenario is a phased and planned diary of HCTs over the next 18-24 months.

What this first announcement does though, is it sends a message out to others in negotiations, the facility is now getting booked up, if they want their trial to happen early they need to sign up early.

I should imagine they do not want to publish figures when giving other details like the amount of volunteers, but that number suggests a large trial so they have given us a steer.

There is possibly a logjam of potential trials caused by what has been happening in the US and the Company will be far more secretive about figures as they will want to convert as many HCTs as possible and some may get better rates than others, you don't publicise that.

If you want to find a negative, it would be that HVO will now have to juggle the staffing as they have reduced to bare bones and will need to build that again, especially if the Iliad trial comes in or any other that wants to be started in 2026.

That's a great RNS! Finally going to be utilising the full Canary Wharf unit.

Laura, it doesn't matter how much you post on each thread, it isn't a race, it doesn't prove you are their top shareholder.

Since you posted on the FAB thread on 4th December '24 spamming about PYC, PYC has dropped to 0.5p, if FAB and SML started at the same point as PYC on 4th December 2024, FAB would now be 3 times that and SML some 27 times that. None of that performance was down to the number of posts, spamming, etc but good solid progress by good Management.

There you go again Laura, always worried about the people posting the facts and reality. Remember when you told everyone they had so much cash they wouldn't need to raise? When I say told everyone, you repeated it on a list post for weeks...

"People are allowed to change their opinions…"

All well and good, but just a shame some here didn't allow others to have a different opinion, when they expressed them.

The fundraise was on the cards for months and yet 3 posters in particular worked to stop anyone from expressing that opinion. The fact that the Company was poor at getting a decent price on it's fundraises was also well reported by posters (some guessing 3p and a EGM vote due to the nominal value) and yet they were dismissed, the record of the Management at the helm was also lamented on here for years and yet it took an activist investor upset he didn't get invited in the recent placing, to make you and others change your opinion?

But you never acknowledged his departure was a warning sign and a half, instead rebutting others who said it was. You have turned a full 180 on this BB and your posts can be read back by everyone to see that.