Member Info for Troutisout1

Ii do, Barclays don't.

"Emptying Canary Wharf: How the financial district's iconic ...

9 Oct 2023 — Some of Canary Wharf's most iconic office buildings are increasingly empty as the district struggles to bounce back from Covid and the working from home boom."

"Working from home wipes almost £1bn off value of Canary Wharf offices"

We can all do that...

"Howard Dawber, head of strategy at Canary Wharf Group, said people will still want to divide time between the workplace and home. But they are missing office and city-centre life, he told the BBC. The Canary Wharf financial complex, in London, has only about 6,000 people on site, against 100,000 pre-Covid."

I think Covid and working from home was main culprit for Canary Wharf.

Whatever it was too cheap down at those levels and still very cheap now....

NMS is 30k shares, if they are quoting an offer they have to trade with you for that amount. If you cannot get an online quote for that amount, go limit at the offer or fill and kill, or alternatively phone your broker.

By going no trade online is a way to try and put off buyers, but all MMs have to make a market both sides for the NMS, if it is quoted at 7.7p at least one MM will have to sell that amount if you want to buy that. They don't have to offer it through online market order though.

You leave the fish out of it please...Definitely a tree shake dropped the price like a stone, once down there was very little to buy, but you could sell half a million above bid price...

Nathan, I too heard they had laid off some staff and also that they were going to be quite quiet for the next few months as not a lot to go through, until H2. That makes sense of the facts we know, that they had a delay in signing contracts and that the trials take many months to organise and set up before the HCT can actually commence.

At what volume though, the trades seem to all be small recently

Looks like your putting in sell prints again Darkryder

Need people to buy the stock then, at the moment it looks quite slow....

This is fantastic news, the OptiMal library is proving to be a good source of target material and the NCI are still working to identify more targets.

FAB join the quest now with their work to validate these cells and the antibody sequencing, this is where the Future Medicines Institute comes in, they have the capital equipment to use to do this work and also have some expert staff on hand and I don't suppose the fact that FAB are doing this on a goodwill basis will harm their standing in both camps.

Massive positive News...

If you take the 83,900 shares from the sell column to the buy column, you will see the trades have been roughly the same today, the SP moving all over the place allows MMs to make wider margins but also to drive the trade.

There would have to be a huge landslide to fill a 3m order at 7.8p and I suspect that isn't going to happen. I also question whether that was a real bid, as they could have pulled it as soon as the price got near and most people buying over 3% of a Company don't advertise it beforehand.

In saying that there is probably a better case for claiming the 500k before the 1m was a buy, as that price was a buy price a bit later

You can't help yourself can you...look at the spread at 9.51hrs (1.15-1.25p) and then look at the other sells before it at exactly the same price and the buy before that which was at 1.199p.

We will never know unless the person who traded it confirms it, but it certainly doesn't look 90% a Buy....

You have added up contract values, they only become revenues when the contract is fulfilled and the revenues taken. With the history of delayed revenues from contracts hitting trading periods and your statement earlier,

"How can I answer or have the evidence for that when the full year ends in June 2025 ?"

I am stating that I think your figures are overdone and perhaps you got carried away in posting them.

I can't understand why the TU wasn't more focussed on H1 where they have figures (as that period ended a month ago) and concentrated on full year forecasts, it is almost as if some of the H1 work has slipped into H2, we'll find out in March

Pot kettle Laura, you seem to only want to read your own positive garbled logic, you moan about things which you haven't noticed have happened, you claim people post this or that when the evidence shows different (you can't edit on LSE), your forecasts are not based on anything but your own feelings, when questioned on them (and you have reposted the £1.4m breakeven figure multiple times) you claim how would you know.

You seem more and more desperate, to quell any discussion on PYC unless it is along your views. That's not how these BBs work and in investing it is a red flag when it does happen.

So I have looked up the £1.7m and can see that unlike other CROs this figure is a peak and unweighted one, which doesn't mean more than possible business has been discussed,

" a peak unweighted pipeline value of more than £1.7m"

Also just above that is some average metrics that show revenues, losses and net assets for the periods before and they show that in the 3 years up to 2024TY the average revenue dropped to £692k, the average loss was £447k and Year-end net assets at 30 June 2024 of £282k have fallen from their year-end peak at June 2020 of £1,315k.

Now I knew this was a potential turnaround situation when I invested here and indeed a couple of contracts were announced in December, however, today's trading statement, ignoring the H1 period and instead focussing on the full year (which still has 5 months to go) seems a little strange. The fact they just re-iterate revs at market expectations and losses slightly less than market expectations suggests to me the figures are nowhere near those you have been posting for months now.

You do read other people's posts Laura? You seem to have neglected answering my earlier question to you,

"They state today that the forecast loss will be smaller than market expectations, so if you think that they could achieve profitability with £1.4m revs then are you now saying they are missing that figure?"

Laura, KingHomerJ was talking about pipeline, not revenue forecast. He also said he was going to check the last presentation to confirm that, I stated to him that I couldn't remember that figure.

You do seem to have a problem with keeping up with things and being a little flippant with your 'facts'

Humpalumps, that would ring true if they used the sometimes large bid to offload into, this seems to be a deliberate trickling to knock down the bid at times (2 or 3 30k sells in quick succession, when you could sell 100k in one hit), but the smaller trades knock down the bid.

The good thing now is the length of time since the last rise has meant most of the traders are now out, there may be some holders looking to sell a few, but the majority are sticking with it.