Member Info for Troutisout1

Laura,

I don't know, I didn't know it had disappeared and it can only be deleted by LSE, so I can only think you complained to them.

So before you try your dirty tricks again you asked whether I was a holder or whether I had sold and I answered that I was still a holder but had sold some as I was very overweight here.

I am not ashamed of that and I wish now that I had sold the lot when I did, but I haven't and I will sit on them, but the trading update had a red flag in it for this H1 period so I don't expect to see much news until the Interims are out and I think they may disappoint, as I believe there has been another shift in revenues from contracted business to the second half of the year.

Look at your postings today, that's obsessed, why do you think you have the right to know everyone's trades.

Look at yourself before calling out someone else.

Humpalumps,

I'd prefer them to go down the second route as an investor, I just can't see the potential clients wanting to share the tech with each other and therefore an acquisition starves the competition of the platforms FAB offer.

Just to show an example of how things that cannot be known, get misrepresented here.

Laura states that all the trades since 9am are buys.

Then says apart from the trade at 11.21am at 0.768p, if that is a sell then why not the trade 40 minutes before that at the same price? I know it was 0.769p to buy for a while this morning but before that we were told that you could buy and sell at the same price, so how would you know whether the 0.788p trade at 9.15am was a buy or a sell?

So from all buys since 9am to perhaps 3 actually being sells and for a volume of just shy of 400k.

So why the need to make something as fact, when you can't possibly know.

On the flipside, when the SP goes into reverse and the offer is so close to the bid, it generally means the MMs are working a big sell order and want to cover it, let's see if this is the case, but only the person selling or buying and the corresponding market maker will know which were sells and which were buys and only the MMs will know why they got the price they did.

Unfortunately the market cap here is too low to start thinking about different listings, a lot of funds will not invest in something of this size. As it grows, and it will grow, then there will be more support from larger entities.

I still think in the medium term, FAB will be acquired by a larger company, so for holders it is important we see the SP at higher levels , to get the best offer possible.

I think this will come after NCI validation of OptiMal and other contracts for their platforms.

With an advertised spread like we have what do you expect DVH?

Looking good today for some good momentum upwards. This is really too cheap at these prices, we just need a piece of positive news to drop into place and we would be back in double figures like a shot. This looks like an area where people are happy to load up, they just need to see others doing so to spur them on.

These are all steps in the right direction, however the quoted spread and actual spread make it unlikely to see new investors start to take positions.

Laura,

'no longer invested' , do you know something I don't?

You're starting to tell fibs in every post now, LOL!

More and more desperate, I wonder what size your holding is and how many times you have actually bought (and sold). You see a long term holder wouldn't need to stoop to the methods you employ to try and pump the price all the time, they would understand the movement of a stock and that nothing moves up in a straight line, they would also be able to talk about all possibilities (including risks).

DeBull,

Today marked the break of the recent uptrend, see another site for a chart from yesterday's close that confirmed the uptrend was still intact.

TRENCH, apparently I should get aggressive with you (for Laura's sake?), but I am sure you stated it was a "coincidence", rather than suggesting that PS and the new TR1 holder know each other?

I remember the ramping Ryan Mancrief was doing under more than one username on LSE for HUM, on other threads and can't really see anyone taking him seriously as an investor, lost a packet at HUM and has not exactly shown his recent purchase here to be that astute!

Well they are not worth that, most brokers overnight will use the closing price, but it is the bid price that allows you to really know what you are worth. Using the last trade price as the value is just incorrect, there is a bid/offer spread set by Market Makers, just because the last trade is 'x' doesn't mean you can sell your shares at the same price.

Darkryder,

It's because you have a weird system with your broker that just shows the last trade reported, where others just see the mid price or the UT closing price.

There was a large delayed trade that was reported at 17.12 at 7.9p and that has made your broker's system report that as an after the close rise. In reality it was traded at 16.12hrs and was inside the spread and the close was at 7.65p.

I always say Friday afternoon is a good time to buy, as the traders exit and the price drifts, but what will Monday hold???

Prop,

You did see that Cornwall Resources Ltd is listed?

Are you insane?

My post was clearly addressed to TRENCH and didn't need to show any anger as I was just replying to the earlier post.

It wasn't aimed at you and yet you had to comment and try and be clever by suggesting I had sold out. That seems to be your typical response here, you cannot allow anyone else to have their opinion, you cannot allow other people to have a discussion (without you taking over), you have to dismiss anyone who has a counter thought about the Company to your own.

I suggest everyone does the same thing...

TRENCH,

Have another listen, the relevant bits are at 13.10, 32.20 (this one especially, "the next steps for us, regarding this is, we have, PYC has been given access to the platform and the newly implemented tool, so we have some work to evaluate that tool ourselves, we are in the position now of exploring with DoseMe options around rolling this tool out across key clinical sites in the US ) and 35.15. I would say from that I am closer to the timeline than someone else that posts here too often.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/8Cm9ydnUWZw

I thought PS said they were exploring putting the doseme tool out to clinicians in the US in the last presentation. I don't think they will have been out long enough for a proper view from these physicians, if indeed many have used the tool and fedback to the Companies.

With regard the FAB and PYC rises and subsequent drop backs FAB has been in front of PYC in these movements and is probably a barometer of what to expect in coming weeks here.

Looks that way, some buying now starting to show.

A retest back to previous resistance of mid December at 7.25p today, the share broke through that resistance in the New Year and rose into double figures. Today's rebound off that level shows some support and ultimately a nice hammer pattern. Hopefully see this rise from here.