RE: HZM Tweet - Nickel consumption to double by 20406 Oct 2021 12:53
Hi RL
The prediction in my post assumes the supply of critical metals will not be constrained. I don’t keep tabs on the lithium market to any great extent which begs the question, I suppose, how can you predict growth in the uptake of EVs if the supply of a critical commodity is going to be constrained. Joe Lowry is convinced that there is going to be a problem on the supply side, in particular lithium supply, but that’s not because there’s a shortage of lithium. On the contrary, there is plenty of lithium, Lowry confirms that. Its ramping up exploration and production to meet expected demand that’s the issue.
I found his comment about under investment in the lithium space in years gone by a bit shallow. You don’t invest in exploration when the price is in the toilet. Likewise a rapid and unexpected increase in demand (lithium, nickel, cobalt, take your pick) resulting in an increase in price will result in a significant increase in exploration. As for the time it takes to bring new discoveries into production price has a way of shortening that time frame.
A Tesla model S has roughly 10 kg of lithium in the battery pack (about 65kg of nickel). You don’t need me to tell you this but the value of the lithium, and nickel for that matter, in a $25,000 Tesla Model S battery pack is relatively small. Lithium or nickel doubling in price will have only a minor impact on the cost of the battery pack and an even smaller impact on the overall cost of the car. The push to bring down prices will come more from scale and manufacturing innovation than commodity prices. The impact on exploration and on timescales getting discoveries into production of a doubling in the price of lithium or nickel is an entirely different matter.
As an aside I’d expect the BDI to have just as big an impact on price than movements in the price of lithium or nickel.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0u0gzs0jrcnan4x/BDI.png?dl=0
There is no physical law which states that power, charge times or cost can’t be improved significantly in a battery. A battery is a chemical composition after all and there are literally trillions of possibilities in the chemical world yet to be tried. The cure for high prices is high prices as you know. Whether that results in developments with sodium-ion batteries, magnesium-ion batteries, solid state batteries, iron sulphide or simply encourages more lithium into the market remains to be seen. Lowry’s prediction of a lithium supply crunch will simply result in either an accelerated push to bring more lithium into the market or the market looking to diversify into other battery technologies (CATL and sodium-ion being a good case in point).
In short plenty of views but no resources to hand I’m afraid. I’m expecting the market to work the way the market is meant to work, it will either increase supply in response to increased demand or innovate out the supply constraints.
In many ways the battery market is still a nascent one.
TDT