Member Info for Toukankahmoon

Just as good as any other indicator that the rampers have been posting.
GLA
7am start tomorrow

RAH
What is or who are “the leaving group”?

Tom
Assuming you count me a troll, I would be ecstatic if the RNS was worded like your last para.

Jeez Ripps I do hope you are right. Even though the thought of you getting f*cked gets more attractive the more you abuse people with your Uber hyped posts. It still isn’t worth me losing the money I’ve got invested.

Tim
. . . and no new evidence of it working has been published since the start of the trial. Just our conclusions from other associated events.

Tim

I have no doubt that it works. But the extent will only be known when we get the RNS

It’s always the answer. But look at my posts. I keep saying that I believe it works. The unanswered question until the RNS is how well.

Tim
They had that info from the rodent and dog experiments

It’s a crossing Ts dotting Is job so that everything is right for the big Science Day.
Maybe they spotted it whilst preparing the new text incorporating conclusions from P1a. But why then put this out ahead of the update they’ll have to do after the RNS? I don’t know.
I do know that I’ve got a lot to lose, for me, if it doesn’t work although I am now prepared for a longer development timescale before it comes good.

IMO

RAH
thanks for explanation

All this was apparent in the rodent and dog results. Where is the bit that talks about results in humans.
Oh sorry. RAH comments that it wouldn’t have been updated unless it works in humans.
They’ve updated it because of the upcoming Science Day. I’m starting to think that we will be told it works but there is some more work to do before starting P1b.
IMO

Indiana
WTF are you talking about. Even I can understand that the Leaving Group is what is left to be excreted after AVA6000 has cleaved.

Ok. So Buen says that there is nothing new and the rest of you rampers true to form turn to abuse. So nothing really has changed.

RAH. Your posts are usually very informative. Please give me a straight answer.
All I can see is some tidying up of the database which of course they would want to do before the Science Day.

Presumably it will need another update after the P1a results are released? Seems odd not to wait and do it all at same time when RNS comes out?

Ok. I can’t stand it anymore. I’ll bite.

What new info have we been given that it works.
No abuse. Just tell me in one sentence what the new info is please

Why is it when realists look at a fact and make a logical conclusion about Avacta they are called derampers and personally abused, but when delusional rampers write a load of hyped codswallop based on nothing more than where the comma was placed in a sentence published by Avacta six months ago, then that is treated as the gospel truth.

The “banter” on here is just like this time 12 months ago. And mostly the same posters are involved. And look what happened then. I truly hope that history doesn’t repeat itself because I’ve got twice as much invested and for the cancer sufferers that will benefit from this incredible technology if it is proved to work.

Benharper
Yes always been concerned about using the word “progress” there’s an implication that it’s not finished yet.
Oh well not long now even if we have to wait until 24 Feb.

. . . and Doggy, the LFT wasn’t binned until it was

Just saying, for a friend

Hey Timmy Chatgpt is really good fun. Have you tried stuff like “write the outline for a story about Thomas the Tank Engine as a rapper”? It’s hilarious.

Nice find. Makes me proud to be an alumnus and an Avacta shareholder of course.

RAH. genuine apologies. I really didn’t believe they could alter the terms of the authorised offer.
Well, as they say, you learn something new everyday.

And to the other ramping twerps, I don’t see how anything in my post was a deramp.

RAH
you are obviously intelligent and well researched and I like your list of pros on Twitter except for this thing you’ve got about “Avacta issuing more shares to meet the huge demand in their recent offer”. If, as you say you are, an experienced investor you will know that it wasn’t a choice they could make. They can’t just decide to issue over the authorised amount of the offer.

So please stop bringing it up in various posts.

Have a nice day!