The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
D-G
We are all praying you are right 😄
How is my post a deramp. It’s fact. The next pivotal moment will be the first arm 2 results. Oh, apart from what your granny reads in her tea leaves of course. Perhaps these would be more accurate if she took them out the tea bag first🤣
Careful Watching, Goldieloc is making a bid for head of the Pom Pom girls how sweet.
I note that it highlights:
*****************************
The chart shows the FAP level is not the limiting factor on whether Dox gets into the TME as per Mid and High cases.
The presence of FAP is all that is required to cleave = the scope of Pre|CISION could be any FAP tumour using the best warhead for that indication
***********************
Which I said was the best slide in that presentation and why I am still keeping the faith just about.
Who is BMHLTD?
WAG
Because if we all think positive thoughts and post ludicrously overhyped fantastic predictions then Avacta is bound to succeed much more quickly 🤣🤣🤣
Or we could just wait for arm 2 results
Yeah we’ve had a number of those and they haven’t always been nice surprises so we sure as hell are due one. 😄
Why does pointing out that there is a different interpretation (to the Pom Pom girls) to Al’s ambiguous communications count as Avacta bashing? Especially when the less positive interpretation has proved more correct nearly every time.
Thorn
Define merit?
CC knows Novartis key players
CC trusts that she won’t be dumped 12 months after the TO
Avacta would be a nice fit with Novartis
Novartis have the funds
Novartis aren’t so big that Avacta will be swallowed up and lost
This isn’t about who will pay the most
I posted a good few weeks back that I thought (conjecture) that CC’s role as head of development was a stipulation of Novartis TO offer.
Yes all guesswork on my part. Time will tell
As I’ve said many times before, CC has friends at Novartis and they are neighbours with Avacta on White City. 👍
My post does not say that all organisations can’t be trusted. It says don’t immediately take things at face value. Again, you obviously aren’t following the Post Office Inquiry which is a horrific example of manipulation by senior organisation managers and their legal representatives in order to protect the organisations image.
In this post I was intending to highlight the shift in focus with our new CEO.
Al’s focus was on the science and nurturing his baby all the way through to the end.
CC’s focus is on delivering a life saving drug into use asap
************************************
Whilst Al was on board I agree with you. But the picture regarding commercialisation has changed completely with Chris. She wants this out there asap and will be happy with a well paid role in new company and share options but isn’t interested in a fortune. The money will take a very poor second place to achieving fast development of the drugs. Also she will want to feel very comfortable with the new company and make sure she isn’t sidelined after a few months
************************
BenH
There you go again
At least I’m not stupid enough to put ‘all ‘ my money in one share no matter how promising it looks
BenH
Another poster determined to read my post in a way that they can argue.
I meant if large institutions can do it. What is to say that any institution is telling all the facts. The chart I refer to is great because it has numbers not the ambiguous phrases that Al was prone to use.
Ice
Following the Post Office Enquiry, I have little faith in what any large institution says. Certainly blatant lying is par for the course it seems. So I’m inclined to view Avacta’s communications with a very suspicious eye.
Ice
Possibly, but not a clearly as Christina.
Apologies
Watching
I tell it how it is. I was concerned about rate of excretion of AVA6000 from the body because I was try to understand why so few patients had react favourably in the trials. So I was delighted by Christina’s explanation with regard to that slide.
As to hot and cold, that pretty much describes the ride with this share over the last 5 years.
And I haven’t dissed Al like some others on here.
Please don’t tell me that you are another that just takes sides to pursue a vindictive agenda.
I posted earlier this week about FAP levels related to dox in the biopsies and how great it was that Christina had emphasised it as one of the important findings and gje said I was lying. I called them out and it appears they’ve gone off the rails finding it really important pursue a vendetta than post anything about Avacta 🤣
To me the fact that AVA6000 works well with differing levels of FAP as emphasised by Christina, was the most comforting point to come out of her description of the science. Providing that they have been able to target patients with tumours that are expected to respond well to dox, then arm2 results could well be the pivotal moment that is well overdue.
GLA
Buen
You mention gje in your post so I presume that he is the author of all my new green boxes. I called him out and now the sad vindictive moron has launched a vendetta against me. Jeez what a ……
Bella
You can’t be right because when I highlighted these excellent facts and what they mean, to gje306 he said I was posting lies.
I guess it just to show that some just want to to stir it up and argue with me regardless of whether I am highlighting great things about Avacta or raising concerns.
Gje306 you are a sad vindictive person. Binned
Gje306
You accused me of spreading lies. I directed you to the chart supporting what I said and you change the subject just to continue arguing with me. I guess you are well under water but don’t take it out on other posters