RE: To help interpret posts18 May 2024 09:32
Hi Apre
Thank you for excluding potty mouthed abuse from your response though it’s still juvenile to make such an unwarranted personal attack
Not sure which is the peer group to which you refer? Unless it’s the one that always interprets the ambiguous communications from Avacta, or even lack of communications from Avact, as good news!
As to needy adolescent : yes I admit my last post was also juvenile but even you must have recognised it was tongue in cheek.
I don’t pretend to be a biochemist but sadly this isn’t all about the science as we have already seen. Yes the science has to work but success is about far more.
As to offering opinions to companies on how they are run: that has been part of my professional role whilst working for 3 of the big five accountancy’s and also independently in the five years before I permanently retired. This to organisations far larger than Avacta in UK, Europe, US (where I lived for 2 years) and Canada.
And finally: I do expect to make some money out of my investment in Avacta and even more want it to succeed so that lives are saved. But what annoys me are the naive posters on here (or worse with a pump and dump agenda) that can only entertain early riches and have probably talked themselves and others into investing far too much into this company at this stage. Yes and that does make me emotional. I presume by your personal attacks you are one of those who is has a very large proportion of your investment capital in this share, maybe all your investment capital. Perhaps this is the peer group to which you refer in which case I don’t want to join it. But I do hope it makes you rich enough to have the lifestyle to which you aspire. Just try to look at the potential risks along the way.
GLA
PS. I hope I have answered your questions even if it’s necessitated revealing more about my working life than I would normally want to on a BB.