Member Info for TorquayFan

GF - thanks for your 08.49 summary. Better days here atm and Prof. Lindy's last video was IMO very assured and positive. GLA

This late RNS, 7.32, caught me out, I'd moved on by then.

From the RNS - "Whilst the agreement is for an initial exclusive evaluation period, there is an option to licence, and we look forward to providing the market with any updates in due course."

Re. 'the option to licence', is it right to assume that for 7 months, it's today's BioTech that has the right to licence? Or is the door left open for another entrant to the World of Glycans ?

That's great news - come on Team Scancell ! Maybe it's Genmab again? If it is interest from another BioTech, that would be good too.

Still in the millions - maybe soon it'll be hundreds of millions? UP goes Scancell's credibility again . . . .

C7 thanks I'm fine and back in the UK for summer. Haven't been posting having filtered Scivvy weeks ago and the BB was cluttered with that stuff. Glad to see you punching and TCOY.

Thanks Johnny. With respect I can't see why that comment on Linkedin could not be repeated here. Anyone ? I am curious . . . . (I don't have access to Linkedin myself or I would post it).

As to the news from MHRA - excellent !

Hey Violin. Good to see the SP bounce back by that miniscule amount. I'm afraid we are all in different situations and with different backgrounds and of different ages - I should know!

Don't panic Mr Mainwaring but for whatever criticism might be bouncing around, your post brought out some good posts in reply.

IMHO, it was great news today but tick tock. ATB

C7 good to see you posting - why not post more ?

Your team should have hung on to Poch IMO -it was good to see that end of season revival. TCOY P.

Nice one Ray . . . btw I was sorry to see Burnley go down. Now for the bounce back !

I just don't agree with this comment earlier from Konar mentioned by others, "we are close enough to the full results now, that Scancell will be holding back for the full reveal".

MMmmm. IMO it would be much better to release significant incremental data as it becomes available, to create a steady build up of excitement to prime the moment of the 'full reveal' . . . ..

With all respect, I can't see any logic in that idea.

It's like not bothering to score until 'extra time'. But never mind . . .

Yes me too Chester . . . .

Re Asco, Bermuda 07.11 suggests " but they may present updated data from more patients", Violin points out some ambiguity and posts", we may / may not get any more info" and Jambo and WTP seem to concur.

Scinv also seems to concur but makes a comment about 'balls' which is confusing given Bermuda's position in the earlier post.

Ray I'm not sure which polarity of Scinv's view you agree with but I'm in the camp that hopes for and maybe expects an update of some sort on the day.

Time will tell. GLA

Good to see a man of faith GF ! ATB

Ruck. You seem to (1) have gone so negative and (2) are indulging in hyper-posting on both sides, (to add to your 'wave rider' skills). Why?

That's the most negative I've ever seen you post - sheer mischief. IMHO

Your F1 analogy is totally unrepresentative of any aspect of Scancell. I can't understand why you are still here?

It's you that's the soap box on pram wheels . . . . .

Magnet - 'slow lane', 'hobbyist'. With due respect that's almost insulting and I doubt very much we are seen in Pharma world that way. Of course we are still waiting for news, but undeniably there's a great deal of activity under way. I know how you feel, but you either wait for the data and deals, or you don't! ATB

Good try Ruck, BUT, don't pretend that everyone, excepting the newest of the 'newbies', wouldn't be aware of whom you were referring to. Never mind.

As for engaging, I've already posted, "I accepted that Scancell might just have known what they were saying, in the first place." ATB

Ruck - IMO it's not right to insult Inan here when you know that he can't reply.

Re. "It was Scancell that came up with 90% based on the same data set. I just wanted to show where it may have come from".

Very noble of you I'm sure, but for me, I accepted that Scancell might just have known what they were saying, in the first place.

Thanks Bermuda. When you have had time to rake through, it would be good to know . . . anything you find. Come on you Techies !

Thanks Johnny and thanks to Ray also, for the reminder about Sath's other 'arm'.

Sath is a major player at Scancell now and seems to have fullest support of the CEO. IMO, he is a very considerable asset. Now for news please!

Ah WTP - get it ! That change was highly predictable after Sath came and not price sensitive at all. Co Sec is purely an Admin role. Usually a bolt-on for the 'Accountant' in a small Company like Scancell. ATB

WTP, for some speculative chat, an RNS?

On that count it's a slightly bizarre suggestion, but the fact remains that Scancell are, lean, mean and ready to go.

In the event of a major happening, i would be surprised if CEO is not a handsome part of it, (but IMO the CFO will take great credit and move on).

But this all speculative. Meantime, Team Scancell beaver on !

News please !

Thanks for reply EE.

Yes BoD wise, we are lean, mean and ready to go!

If only. ATB