RE: Boris in FT on his green revolution plans18 Nov 2020 13:03
Hi Caribs
What we know is they have $9.2M left and they did say it was enough to last them until late January or so in the end of October RNS.
Risk number one is Boris Johnson who exaggerates everything and is really poor on delivery. We have lengthy delays and uncertainty about HS2 railway and Heathrow airport runway decisions as example as what that guy is likeas he flip flops and dithers.
Risk number 2 is Brexit deal or no deal with EU. It is a set back for this project if everything between EU and UK is mired in tariffs.
The third risk is they are building a refinery and the mine at the same time with both projects in different countries with Covid-19 still not resolved, with economic downturn still on-going as a risk and do they have the skills and experience to do both of those and what happens if the consultancies miss something and would they spot it before its to late. The bigger the project the greater a chance of a set back.
The fourth risk is that the finances to deliver all of it are far greater and it may be far more than 15% to be sought from investors, especially as Boris Johnson proclaims that it will be industry that will pay for most of the green agenda which implies governments are taking far less risk and putting on to someone else.
The fifth risk is that sovereign governments are in so much debt what happens if they don't honour the future procurement they promise and will they allow a proper commercial rate for electricity or will the consumer be subsidised by a tough regulator to minimise an pay back on investment that feeds back on the whole supply chain.
The sixth risk is what happens if Angola blocks the raw supply from the mine to the UK that has a costly refiner and instead wants to supply China in a future government administration after they have imitated the UK in refiner production. An alternative risk is a mine wall collapses and the refiner suddenly does not receive material to meet orders and so one problem magnifies down to the chain.
I am sure some of those risks can be minimised on contractual terms and so forth but we do not have the BFS, we do not have a risk assessment, we do not know if the company comes up with more ideas and we get more delays and more expense with consultants. Yes there are many good points with the project but will it lose focus, will it be overtaken by other competitors who are speeding forward. All of the above is my being the devils advocate in trying to see what could wrong.
Regards Tony