Excalibur17 Feb 2021 16:02
Looking at the Excalibur test, I note the following:
As noted previously, Excalibur is Nasopharyngeal. Prof Sir Chris Evans' media blitz paid off - and /or he has friends in high places to have got this through.
Prof Sir Chris knowingly makes this incorrect claim, "This test can be used with complete confidence in a wide range of everyday settings and will help organisations and businesses operate with the knowledge that their personnel are not infectious at the time of testing."
Sounds dodgy to me!!
No, no, no, no - and this is one more 'no' than Mrs Thatcher in her Bruges speech: if Sensitivity is 96%, 100% confidence can't be claimed.
The other, possibly, dodgy thing about the Excalibur test, amongst many, probably, is:
How is it possible to achieve 96% Sensitivity with a Nasopharyngeal test?
Thoughts:
* 96% Sensitivity with Nasopharyngeal tests, even with PCR processing, seems extraordinary.
* The Korean hospital must be exceptionally - improbably (?) - good at taking Nasopharyngeal tests.
* More details, in the form of a peer reviewed paper, are needed.
* I thought the UK government was saying they won't now accept Nasopharyngeal tests? Although, SureScreen and Excalibur both appear to be Nasopharyngeal tests, as is the Innova test!!
Test, Test, Test