Member Info for Toffers

Has Mac run out of the kola?! :) Feet up and relaxed, but the springs are broken!

And only 5 weeks to the High Court final hearing, if it remains listed and isn't put back!

6.05p to buy on HL - prices are 15 mins delayed, so not live!

Is it rising on anticipation of what might be in the AIM on AIR interview? I can't see that SD can say anything new though. Perhaps he could explain though how we would 'hypothetically' fund the 70% Newcrest share in Tel/Hav if it were offered to us by Newmont? That might help steady the ship a bit if he could assure that it wouldn't mean say 700+ million, as I'm sure he must have an inkling.

I pay for private health insurance which includes cancer care, I've paid it during my working life, and will continue to pay it even whilst a mature student studying, because for me, that frees up funds for someone else who can't afford to pay for private health care, and ought to be able to get help on the NHS, but the NHS is not a bottomless pit, and where people can afford to pay themselves, they should volunteer it. So I would hope that all those advocating this test on here, would be happy to pay for it, and as quite a few have traded this, made a profit on it and left, I hope they are the ones who will put their hands in their pockets and pay, and what's more, be generous and pay for someone else's test also, so as to give back. my views.

Marcus, you will have seen from my posts yesterday that my ex partner had prostate cancer, he had a high reading, but the NH were exemplary, he had the blood test, result back next day and discussions with doc, saw the consultant the following week, and was operated on two weeks later and given the all clear. The NHS can't afford to provide all and sundry with a £750 test, it just won't happen, they have to prioritize and that is based on medical need, so a more aggressive cancer in a younger person say, will no doubt take precedence over someone older with a less aggressive cancer. I'm not making light of prostate cancer, but the survival rates are much higher and so the risks are less in treating more aggressive cancers first I imagine. If you want a £750 test then I would imagine you either pay for it yourself if you think your life is worth doing that for, and I would imagine therefore that you would, or you ask your health insurers if they will pay for it, but then your premiums will rise on the next anniversary of your policy no doubt! The NHS cannot afford to pay out willy nilly, and at £750 a shot, and I don't know if that includes processing costs at a private lab or not, I would imagine you would pay, and I think that's only right, otherwise you accept what the NHS is able to provide, given its limited funding, or you accept that you must pay far higher taxes so the govt can try and funnel some more funds in to it. my views.

I know I'm not Tymers biggest fan, but I will second that. The comment was well out of order and whoever made it should apologise.

Newuncle, appreciate the concern, but I'm female!!!!

I've produced sources, which is more than some! Brew time.

Newuncle going for the sympathy vote now following all his ramping with F1Driver. Time for a brew.

"Generally for men with prostate cancer in England:

more than 95 out of 100 (more than 95%) will survive their cancer for 1 year or more

more than 85 out of 100 (more than 85%) will survive their cancer for 5 years or more

almost 80 out of 100 (almost 80%) will survive their cancer for 10 years or more"

source as mentioned previously and it's a recognised source, some here don't even quote their sources for checking their supposed 'facts'!

I'm not bothered about the price other than people being spiked on the rampathon that occurred and is still continuing by a few here, as is pretty obvious.

Newuncle, the US will develop and use their own. Just like they did the pfizer vaccine, for their market, and then sold it to ours. In effect, we are talking about the UK market, and in any event, the figures show, as I've posted below, that deaths from prostate cancer are minimal in comparison to much more aggressive cancers which will take priority.

Marcus, those figures are there now on the cancer research site, go tell them if you want to argue them.

The research paper relating to the NHS test is dated February this year, not 3 years ago. Go and read it.

Newuncle, it's not priority, globally the deaths from prostate cancer are small in comparison to other cancers that are much more invasive. Perhaps they should take a more barbic view and just chop your bits off for prostate cancer and be done with it, because that's what women have to endure with breast cancer! That would then save a lot of money and time!

"Generally for men with prostate cancer in England:

more than 95 out of 100 (more than 95%) will survive their cancer for 1 year or more

more than 85 out of 100 (more than 85%) will survive their cancer for 5 years or more

almost 80 out of 100 (almost 80%) will survive their cancer for 10 years or more"

source as mentioned in previous post

It has one of the highest survival rates for cancers anyway, the priorty will always be for those cancers with lower survival rates, sad, but what's more important, trying to save a life of someone young but with a more aggressive cancer or an older person with prostate cancer? there's always a pecking order in medicine, there has to be, and as prostate cancer tends to affect older men, plus the chances of survival being greater anyway, the priority for funding is no doubt going to lie elsewhere in my view.

see cancer research uk. org on prostate cancer

And where are people going to get £750 for a test from? the NHS is on its knees financially, that's why they're developing their own, they are not going to pay £750 a throw! In the interim, it will be business as usual, unless you want to pay for the test that superdrug sell!

Well anyone spiked at between 47p-51p by the rampers must be feeling really positive now (not)! Look at the market cap people, you need to understand about market caps first and revenue second. Then look at where funds are going to come from to manufacture etc. Look what happened to the shares relating to the covid vaccines, now absolutely flat on their face. As I said yesterday, there's always someone coming up behind with a tweak on tests like this, and there's one out there that has a 99% success rate on testing, compared to 55-94% here! The research paper here suggested that there should be further testing, that was in February, with a wider cohort base, but it looks as though that wasn't done. my views.

The 17009 buy this morning just after 9am is mine, yet shown as red! so assumedly most of the trades shown as red so far this morning are actually buys!