RE: Investment Case14 Jan 2021 12:24
Hi Feynzz!
I can't answer all your questions offhand, but here is some background for you:
1. Current guidance for FY2021 155K to 165K oz PGMs. Financial year runs Oct - Set - production on target after Q1. Like with SLP, Prill split strongly favours rhodium (at 9.5%, I think).
2. Tharisa is a bi-product chrome and PGM miner - i.e. it's like SLP and Samancor combined. It owns 76% of the Thrisa mine (26% is a BEE partner). Chrome operations are modern and moderately profitable at current chrome price of $150/t.
3. Tharisa has several key advantages over SLP. Its mine life is much longer, 14 years open pit and 40 years underground. It does not suffer from "Samancor association risk". It has viable plans to expand production via Vulcan Fine Chrome Plant ($50m Capex, currently being built) and via improvements in PGM grades and recoveries (target 200K ounces per year). It has an excellent exploration asset (Karo in Zimbabwe). THS also obtains a higher basket price for its PGM concentrate than SLP - we think because it is less oxidised (not dumps material, but fresh ore).
4. THS has a clear dividend policy - no less that 15% of NPAT. A dividend is upcoming in February.
5. Net debt and cash position is listed in last RNS - it's rapidly evaporating.
6. All in all, THS is simply a larger operation than SLP, so it should have a substantially higher mcap than SLP. I think the mcap ratio should be between 1.5:1 and 2:1. You'll see that currently we are near 1.3:1. IMO, that makes THS the superior investment proposition.
7. None of this should be taken to imply that SLP is a bad investment proposition. It is still an excellent one.