Member Info for The.Italian

Pleased to see it on another site though and the sites look quite punchy. couldnt find the review but one site said it was out of stock. anyway, as far a i'm concerned the more sites the better.all down to sales now and, of course, FDA.

Certainly am.

Perceptive and cogent post, vascular.entirely agree.

Sigmaroc. been hard hit by ukraine war,but recovering.

afternoon bignose.yes and they were not performance related,so no high or even low targets, which is in accordance with their normal approach im afraid. nice work if you can get it.

https://www.deeplongevity.com/employers i think this is new (not the product but the promotional spiel).i thought it was quite interesting, as you can see the thrust of the strategy.identifying the "in need"employees.very in tune with todays snowflake culture and the "who can i blame for my problems?"mentality.will it get any traction? who knows!

well that may or may not be true(certainly could be),but what i think is undeniable is that if they can market/promote as "fda approved" it is going to increase the effectiveness of any campaign dramatically.

nothing from HL.

interesting to see the repetition of the unacceptable and significantly undervalues quote.does this create a quasi- binding backdrop in which the new bid (if it materialises) must be viewed?

morning bignose.well i don't mind if they do go back to their roots provided they can sell DLI for $200m before they go! lol.seriously though i agree that something just doesn't feel right.as always time will tell.

evening bignose.ive been tied up most of the day,but have now had a chance to give some thought to matters, but i'm afraid to say that in all honesty i have absolutely no idea what, if anything, is in mellon's contemplation for the future.i agree that in principle fewer shares in issue should lead to greater volatility through reduced liquidity and this was probably the reason behind the poor reception to the news(although i do think the name change fiasco won't have helped).however i am inclined to think that this may not have too much of an impact going forward bearing in mind the tiny value of shares normally traded.even when we get a bigger volume day and the price moves more than normal,the value traded is still minuscule in the context of a publicly traded main market company.i may have got this completely wrong of course,but im not sure that increased volatility is inevitable.

where i am completely with you is in being suspicious of the future intent as perhaps revealed by inspecting the entrails of the proposal. they expressly refer to the problem of being unable to issue new shares at a discount to the nominal value,hence the convoluted exercise to get the nominal down to 0.001 hkd. clearly they don't want to leave it at the post consolidation,but pre subdivision,value of 0.20 hkd,but to arrive at 0.001hkd hardly suggest confidence in future s/p performance.also as you say,does this presage some huge recapitalisation which will finally obliterate existing pis. your guess is as good as mine.of course they may simply have gone for what seems be an unnecessarily low nominal value just to generate the accounting credit of $45m approx (the difference between the nominal value of the existing issued capital and the value of the issued capital after capital reduction)but im no accountant and will have to leave it to others to evaluate this. feeling very much like a straw blowing in the wind here im afraid.

doubt it.

assuming the putative fund raise takes place,it will be interesting to see the take up.how enthusiastic are other bodies outside of dunkerton? could become a very interesting situation.

morning albert.yes i would agree with that. the interviewers did ask a couple of searching questions which were pretty much sidestepped and i slightly got the impression that jon v was happy when it was over. all in all pretty superficial but as you say there for appearances

just listened to it and perhaps not the greatest contribution to the sum of human knowledge. that's 10 minutes i shall not get back.oh well.

interview from fridayhttps://uk.news.yahoo.com/napster-ceo-disrupting-music-industry-200524940.html

essentially train tracks it is usually very uncomfortable for PIs to end up holding in a private company.if you feel you have little control over events when holding in a listed company magnify that by 10 or 20 when in a private one.i appreciate you are probably fully aware of this ,but just voicing my personal opinion.

if there is a cash call as sky suggests, then it may provide an opportunity to buy in the market afterwards in the hope that dunkerton (who will presumably participate and increase his holding) may be thinking of taking private in the not too distant future.quite risky though.

i think that is correct@hash.the rns refers to the consideration being paid into an escrow account,but it seems clear this will not happen until the agreement/sale has been completed, which, as you say, requires (inter alia) s/h approval.

morning albert.yes it's 17.45 tomorrow,but i expect i'll have to find a recording,so probably won't hear it till sometime over the weekend.hope it has something of interest.