Member Info for The.Italian

As at 19th june LO had 28.5%, so selling (or buying) 1/2% would require reporting. that is somewhere between £800,000 and £900,000 as a rough estimate, so not a huge figure in the overall scheme of things. my point really is just that any change in their position, albeit of a relatively modest amount, would result in a reporting requirement, but as yet nothing has been notified, so not sure they are necessarily the putative background seller. just musing of course.

That is a very interesting and pertinent question,KG16.

Very good of you PG.look forward to hearing further as and when.

I suspect you have already answered your own question.

Good news for those on II.

Morning bignose.all a bit odd.the volume so far is 3,160,000 in old money,so not particularly large.so it certainly suggests that there could be huge movements in the s/p (either way) if we had any real volume. sorry to harp on a bit about the SPA,but im still hopeful of some news next month.

Morning bignose.i suspect someone at erp didn't fully understand the concept of a dual listing!

Evening albert and PG. yes albert ,i would get on to II asap, as they need to adopt a responsible and professional approach to matters,rather than the dismissive one they seem be currently adopting. very interesting news ,PG.look forward to hearing further if you get any more news.

I suppose it will depend on what the actual developments are,or at least what they are reported as being!

Agreed Amitshah.seems very odd not to have been formally RNSd if true.

Morning again bignose.i was wondering if you had watched the seminar.i tried earlier today but couldn't get it to work. will try again later. im afraid there doesn't seem to have been any real attempt to market fortacin.we know there are restrictions,particularly in the RX days,but i agree that the recent efforts seem to be non existent.perhps it's a function of the differing perceptions between ED and PE. perhaps the progress in china will help to stimulate some interest in other areas?

Morning all. it would certainly seem to make sense to wait for china news and whilst im also loathe to offer advice to prof, i personally wouldn't be exiting at this point.

Just to confirm the i have also received payments at 71p per share into my HL accounts.so just the tokens left now.

Well professor,t otally understand your position and wish you well in your future endeavours whatever they may be and in whatever sphere. i shall stick it out here for a while,just to see what happens.good luck to you!

Afternoon albert et al.i will have to check my hl accounts at weekend in view of offler's post.perhaps I've missed them as i don't really check the cash section on a regular basis. have to say im not particularly happy with II,as i have an account with them for some non uk shares which i couldn't hold in HL.i think they have become very expensive with the monthly fee and i don't find it a particularly user friendly platform.just my opinion of course. others may feel otherwise.will let board know if I've had further payments tomorrow.

Very helpful,glenstar.appreciated. i will wait a while to see if i hear from hl,without having to press them.agree that the escrow payment is better than we might nave expected.

Wouldn't argue with that bignose.just have to see how it goes.

Looking at the s/p reaction so far (down 4% as i type)i think the number has been perceived a little negatively.my own view is that there is almost always excessive optimism about figures for sales,based on total market size and maximum capture projections etc. bearing in mind it is (apparently?)only uk and belgium and its only a couple of months, i thought figure was perfectly satisfactory.i think fum must think that as well,as they were not obliged to give any figure at this point.i realise we have the presentations now,so may have felt some pressure to give out a figure,but if it was less than good they could easily have just said too early etc.im quite happy atm,but im no expert lol.

Morning bignose.wonder whether the change of auditor will result in any change of accounting approach.dont suppose the new lot would have been appointed if they were going to rock the boat, but we will see.

Sea tank,it is just a suggestion but i think you might have to be a bit more proactive with II.if you read pension deficit's post at13.28 on the 9th june, you will see he sets out verbatim the email that holders on HL have had quite recently.i think it is a reasonable approach by them to matters atm and you will see it clearly acknowledges, in effect, that they as a platform have some continuing involvement in matters.i fail to see how II can properly seek,as it sounds like they are trying to do, to absolve themselves from any further responsibility towards you.if you care to advise them of the content of HL's note they may perhaps be more inclined to assist.as the registered holder of your shares they are the first line of communication with NMinc( from whom the consideration payments etc are due) and it seems to me that if they refuse to assist you would have good grounds for a complaint.

Jambor's post 0n 10/5/23 refers to an email he had from pete wylie, the napster CFO. perhaps if he reads this he might be able to provide the email address, which might help.

there may also be a general enquiry email address for the napster foundation,which you might be able to find,as it seems that the foundation is overseeing the arrangements(whatever they may prove to be)regarding the tokens for those investors holding on platforms like HL.

sorry if this is already clear to you,but hope it may help a bit.