Member Info for The.Italian

apologies.i should have taken time to assess the RNS rather than jumping to conclusions (no idea how predictive text produced the incomprehensible header).yes its not clear what has happened. phd RNSd on21/10/19 that chelverton had 4.99% (4,750,000 shares).this is what was shown on the website etc.todays rns clearly states a purchase but it looks like it might has
ve been rushed as there is some sort of typo in the amount which is given as 1,00,000 ? what also puzzles me is if they have simply reduced to 4.01% why announce at all as they would not have crossed a threshold.i suppose they can anounce if they wish even if not obliged to .perhaps matters will become clearer tomorrow as if in fact its a sale by chelverton we may learn the acquirers identity in next day or so.more than happy to be corrected or given clarification by anyone else who understands it better.as you say bunco it could be that they reduced below 4%but didn't report it and have now gone back above it but that seems a bit odd.anyway glad to see we retained the days gains into close as clearly some downward s/p pressure from sales in latter part of day.

chelverton asset management 4.01% on 5/5 20.very encouraging.

well let us hope our s/p does not follow the trajectory of ICON's since the end of November.

ok thats interesting measure twice.there seem to be so many different measures one can look at but small progressions are very encouraging imo

well bignose i agree with all that and indeed have thought many times about e mailing him about it but never followed through.i have emailed him several times over the years and have almost always had a reply so will try and psyche myself up to point it out.if he does remove it it will at least reduce my anger a tad.lol

of course thats right optimist.there are a lot of things that we might expect to happen which are not happening.i completedy accept that but i still feel that the recent developments re new and increasing large investors are of more significance in the long term that the short term shortcomings.hope I'm right.gla

still couldn't find the time to remove our news entry from may 2019 regarding our entry into the exploding CBD market. so be honest its that sort of small thing which can separate the competent from the incompetent.i cannot tell you how angry i feel every time i am forced to see it when i go on their website.not to mention the it is now,imo,positively misleading.if regent had an image i would be worried it might damage it!

i have to say I'm with you on this one Djp57.

oh my god! you couldn't make it up! gla

another 1m in delayed trades from 10.09 just published.looking at s/p at that time would suggest buys.

interesting mel.where do you think Facebook fit in all this?

thanks bignose.strangely i was only thinking this morning whether there had been any update.completely agree with your comments of course but at least sme small semblance of life remains (in the share that is not me....although i don't know?)

another 2,085,000 gone in two tranches at29p.has to be something going on.

looking at the level 2 change suspect they were buys.could be wrong.

yes looks like something is afoot.can never b sure of course,but on yesterdays volume alone i would expect a TR1 .again not guaranteed of course.

also just noticed the price.approx 2.2 m shares bought at 28.6 and 28.7p.

if my maths is correct about 3% in value of company's shares traded today.vast majority are indicative buys. see the very large trades into the close.not getting excited but perhaps a RNS tomorrow?

lost 95% of value in 30 seconds and then it got really bad!

then i expect its more than a "bit".good luck anyway.

yes i expect it will be.