Member Info for The.Italian

none of my business of course but as you've mentioned it, did you buy in after your post and before the rise later this afternoon? timing is very much a matter of luck imo,and i speak as someone who traded out of synigegen the day before it rose 550% or so. dont worry if you don't want to comment since as i say its none of my business.

that seems a lot.not sure how popular she is the days but sounds very good pricing.is there some sort of limit to how many can participate per ticket as it were or does it not work like that?

thank you robidicus.appreciate your reply.will just have to wait and see.

robidicus on a serious note could you elaborate i can't see the tweet you must have in mind.im not one to encourage wild speculation (wasn't too impressed with the $1b talk ) but there may be something in the "following" idea as it does make sense.not seeking set hares running,just interested.

thats the chap.actually i do look a lot like him, although do have more hair!

oh dear.it just gets better and better. phds are obviously not what they were.us non pharma types better watch out.lol now beyond parody.

mr not dr. it really isn't my day is it.lol

well it could have been worse i suppose, but not much and i did read it before posting.actually i have a lot in common with Dr magoo, apart,unfortunately,from the wealthy bit.lol.

classic! ovulation/population.who on earth designed this ludicrous predictive text.

interesting post IFOXXX.from a purely selfish uncaring viewpoint i was actually quite encouraged by it.not because lloyd webber had managed to stage something but rather because it sounds simply awful.nothing to do with the performer who i think is quite talented but the viewing experience sounds horrendous.i speak as someone who has until yesterday avoided having to put on a mask throughout the pandemic.yesterday i had to go to the bank ,.i found the whole idea of wearing a mask (and for a coulee of shops later)extremely off-putting and would not engage voluntarily in any event which required it.now thats jus me but despite my age I'm not sure I'm that unrepresentative of the general ovulation.not sure "live"theatre is going to be coming soon .

on the two large single protected transactions totalling over£100k.from the s/p movement (ignoring the uncrossing trade)you would have to assume they are sales presumably by the same party,but obviously cannot be sure.not necessarily that significant but interesting.

i don't know what to catfish on tinder means,but it sounds highly unpleasant.actually in not even sure what tinder is,but i suspect it is not aimed at my age group.good luck all who are holding(i still have my original holding)

one small point i have noticed.in their operations update on19th may they mentioned that lockdown restrictions migh impact the target times for completion of this stage to val 201.there was no mention of this in the AGM update,so far as i can see,but rather confirmation that things were on track. hopefuly this means there has been no materially adverse impact timewise.

more interesting bignose/

i don't agree bucolic.i really don't think anyone is seriously thinking that fum are trying to say that med 30000has been the SUBJECT of a p3 trial. they use the word"with"and i accept they may be trying to put a positive slant on it,but the p3 data is the basis of the new application so it is difficult to see how else they could reasonably put it. i seriously cannot believe the they would think they could,in some way,hoodwink the ema.the ema will have had the fullest possible detail of what has gone on and will be under no illusions surely.further data etc may still be required of course,but at the moment we just don't know.

well i was rather hoping they would waive any trials completely! seriously, agree with your comments to dougie.i would add that this news is really only the possible start to the next chapter.it's very good news in itself as without this we were frankly dead in the water so far as europe was concerned.its good that recordati have felt it worthwhile to pursue the change (it must have cost something,perhaps quite a lot)so presumably they still see some potential sales wise.my understanding was that they would wait for approval(i imagine this will be taken for granted now()before undertaking market research re pricing and marketingetc,so its probably going to be some time before we get any substantive news but at least its still alive so to speak

odysseus i have been out ,but i see you have asked in a polite way for my reasons.i can see that certain posters have to some extent preempted my reply, but i will nevertheless set out my thoughts.i may be completely wrong of course,i which case i would wish to apologise,but here is my reasoning.posters who come onto boards with an agenda to drive down share prices tend to follow certain patterns.one of these is what might be called the openminded approach.their initial post is invariably very friendly,couched in terms of honest openminded enquiry from someone seeking to decide whether to invest or not. quite often the poster suggests some form of experience or expertise in the area in which the target operates.the initial post rarely highlights any negatives about the company.this initial post is then followed in short order by ones which start to express concerns and highlight the risks (nothing wrong with that per se )and in particular emphasise the company's previous failures etc.such posts still claim openmindedness and an honest desire to get information or others views but the emphasis of the posts becomes increasingly negative.such posts are often categorised by a determination to include references to historic failures ,for example your reference to poor condom sales,which is a subtle,or not so subtle, attempt to impart subliminal negativity.i could go on but i trust this makes my view clear.i have to say this was my view as soon as i read your first post,but not wishing to be condemnatory in a precipitous way i have waited to see if the posts developed in the way they have.it is interesting,though not of course conclusive that others have reached the same conclusion.rest assured this is not written.in a desperate attempt to quell or deride genuine concerns or criticism and i readily accept that certain points made by you have some substance.rather is is my assessment of the purpose behind your posts.in that i can only endorse backinblacks observation.hope this clarifies.

gracious reply odysseus.appreciated.

not defensive at all odysseus.my assumption as to your risk profile, and i accept it is just that ,is based on the broad thrust of your post and is, i think,perfectly reasonable. i accept that you disagree.my advice is genuine .there is every possibility that the s/p will go to 10p,even lower.we don't know.thats the risk.you won't find anyone here who can give you any meaningful guidance.if i had your reservations and concerns i wouldn't invest. but, with respect.,i am beginning to sense a strong agenda and pattern emerging, hence the tone of my post.i am not trying to be gratuitously offensive but i genuinely doubt the sincerity of your posts.

odysseus i become more intrigued by your posts each day .perfectly sensible question about funding of course, but presumably you are aware that FUM carried out a very successful fundraise in january ,in which LO increased its holding fairly substantially.LO also has warrants to subscribe which are only exercisable at 40p. the funds raised were to assist with the proposed new applications for device approva.wel do not yet know what further trial costs may be necessary.clearly a further trial is required re FDA approval, but its size and cost is not yet known.whether any furthers trials will be required for EMA is a matter of speculation, although as you seem to think that approvals are likely to be delayed, i assume you incline to the view that further information and perhaps a trial may be required for ema as well. you may be right, you may be wrong. nothing has yet been said to suggest that the ema is likely to be delayed.we simply don't know. i don't normally offer advice to investors, but as you seem to be actively seeking it, this is my advice. do not invest, or invest further in FUM. you clearly have a low risk tolerance, as well as a number of reservations about the bod and the product. as it it obvious to anyone investing in very small pharmas like this that periodic capital raises are not only possible, but indeed likely. i fear this is not for you.its all about risk versus rewarded. when concerns about risk outweigh the desire for reward the only sensible decision is to look elsewhere.just my opinion of course.hope it helps. other opinions are available