Member Info for The.Italian

well i would agree with that, although it could be the reason.just seems too large a response.some of the trades were genuinely large (not as measured by the normal aim yardstick of bigger than normal) .

whilst I'm as keen as anyone to see a proper a lister (or at least a good b+)coming up at brixton or elsewhere, i think its important not to overlook the incremental growth of viewing figures. not saying they are amazing but at least showing encouraging growth imo.

you tube Fall out boy 213k 2 months
lewis capaldi 207k 2 months
frank carter 158k 2 months
wiz Khalifa 121k 2 months
JoJo 84k just over 1 month
just think its interesting and important not to lose sight of the overall picture

i was thinking something like this.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgvgY0igIW4

ok lofas thanks for that also.have to say I'm struggling a bit with that one,although it does now make sense of some of the more enigmatic posts.i can understand the reasoning and its intriguing,but I'm not too sure about it.many thanks for the explanation though.hope you are right of course! ,

thanks for that albert.thats inexactly my view.i suspect the warrant expiry and the s/p uplift are just coincidences and that the main cause was the recommendation,although it does seem a pretty impressive response to the same.perhaps time will tell.

hello bucolic.beeno ut for a bit but to answer your question i was 62. so not massively early but even those few extra years have been very welcome. have to say that in all these years i don't think i have ever actually written the word "crotchety" ,so particularly pleased to have got the spelling right.i was waiting for the obvious puns, but at least it shows BE has a sense of humour. gla.

bluechip i can wholeheartedly recommend retirement and the earlier the better imo.not saying you will get it from this share, but as an early retiree myself its certainly something to be recommended.not for everyone course,but i for one haven't missed working for a single second.we are all different of course and other views are available.just lightening the board mood.too crotchety for the weekend imo.

im not the sharpest tool in the box i know, but I'm struggling see how the exercise of the warrants whichwere due to expire on the31st would be a trigger for the share rise, which is, i think ,what some have in mind. the warrants have been in the money for a long time and could have been exercised at greater profit than now on several occasions at any time before end of yesterday. if they have been exercised i would expect the s/p to fall (more shares at lower cost etc)not rise.if the thought is manufacture a rise on a recommendation and then forward sell, well i suppose thats possible,but not terribly convincing to my mind. more than happy to be put right if my thinking is wide of the mark,as I'm puzzling over this.

I'm just trying to keep the covid angle in perspective ,not ignoring it.but equally not seeking to make too much of it either. we have different views clearly as to its likely impact in FUM's case.

b e its spam on multiple boards.ignore it.

sorry be i don't agree.first my post wasnt directed at you, so i am not suggesting you or anyone else used the word substantive,it is simply my choice of word to describe my view that although there my be some delay it is unlikely imo to be substantive and thus not,for me a matter of concern. of course i have no idea whether it will be substantive or not but nor do those who try to hang their negative hats on this peg. so far none of the other pharmas in which i am interested have experienced any significant delays (no doubt some others have but not mine)and i am merely agreeing with the views of the previous poster.i am sorry if you feel my view is absurd but i think you are deliberately reading too much into it to make your point.their are other more significant concerns which i would have thought you would place more weight on (as i do ) rather than the rather feeble generic covid angle..

agreed ndr50. there are some areas of legitimate concern (as with any investment) but substantive delay due to covid 19 is not, imo ,one of them.

presumably

yes all trades today at 35.9p or above. presumed. y TU can be any time from next week onwards,interesting if it pushes the s/p up a bit. if so it might cause Dbay to accelerate their buying ,if that is their intention. i imagine they would need 20%plus before going for any form of T/O bid,but several different possible scenarios no doubt.

not suggesting anything dodgy for moment bonker.LF posted that he had replied to a post by you but both had been removed.i confirmed that thought i had seen post by you but when i tried to look at it it was gone.obviously if you haven't posted anything and nothing has been removed i must be imagining things.no intention to set any hares running ,so apologies for my mistake.

watch the trades.never seen a trade for 1 share described as single protected portfolio transaction before.must surely be meant to apply to the 1.1m trade also now reported.possible accumulation, who knows.

agreed l/f. i think that was speculation from me about reading festival etc,but obviously nothing has materialised there, so not sure why that happened.

thanks LF .just need to sit and wait.

i thought i spotted a post by bonker but when i tried to read it it was gone.anything interesting?

sorry be you haven't understood my post.if you look at the position from the start point of the new processfor med 3000 (the only sensible starting point imo,no point on dwelling on past failures)there has been no delay. just proceeding with matters as envisaged at start of year of year . thats my point, but i accept you don't agree and will leave it at that. obviously anyone stupid or biased enough to think we were going to get any approval this year might think there has been some delay, but i do not fall into that category.