RE: Apples and Oranges9 Nov 2021 19:23
Prof,
Thanks for bringing up this topic.
Quickly looking at some of Pretivm financials, it seems that the silver revenue is built into their ‘total cash costs’, which is then added into the AISC along with other mining and operational costs. They also use USD unless specially referencing CAD, and I am seeing a Q2 AISC of USD 1,099. Happy to be corrected, this might just be an anomaly for 2021 due to capex or similar.
So unless I am mistaken, similar to our copper, their silver revenue is built into the AISC as a production credit, thus we can use like for like gold ounces v. AISC when comparing the two.
HAV clear wins from an AISC perspective, and It’s obvious with this deal that NCM want gold ounces now. The Brucejack mine has a avg. head grade (2021 production) of around 8.5 g/t with a 97% recovery rate, yet still a very average AISC. Just goes to show how world class the combination of Copper, NCM and HAV / Cadia are. Truly special.
So down to the comparison of companies. Pretivm has one very good asset (Brucejack) with 4.2m oz (100%) proven resource. If HAV attains 14m oz, GGP (30%) are in a similar position. Brucejack still has good exploration upside and room to grow, and it’s also obvious that people are starting to realise HAV has a floor of 20m oz. GGP current market cap $880m, Pretivm sale market cap seemingly around $2.7b.
The purchase price of Pretivm would put us around 50p. My main point would be that I like the economics and growth prospects of HAV much more, and if we continue on the current trajectory of just letting HAV grow and into production, there’s a nice floor under GGP well above where we are (say 50p and work up from there).
When we start talking about multiple assets, 2k+ gold price, further growth outside the current ore body, etc. you start to see where this can really go in time. Hint: not pence.
Finally, ounces in the ground were purchased today on the ‘fair market’ :)