Equality of comments23 Jun 2021 16:22
Every poster has a right to express an opinion. If you feel strongly enough to reply, then the intelligent way is to criticise it constructively, rather than the usual 'you do spout rubbish'. There are a some posters, who are just part of 'the herd' and only want to hear 'nice' comments about their investment, which, in their minds, justifies their decision to buy. I would place aandi at the head of this herd. His posts, which take a considerable time to formulate, are designed for him, to reinforce his decision, and for good measure he puts in a dig at a competitor ( who he is probably not invested in), PHE, with this line;
'PHE partnership is with peel a waste management company, many years away from profit.'
First, Peel Environment, who have the agreement with PHE, are part of Peel L&P, with fingers in many pies, including property management, property development, green energy planning, ports , investments, to name a few. PHE will return a profit before EQT. The first DMG plant construction start is Q4, and completion Q2 2022. There are other projects that might come to fruition before this one. The business model of PHE is very simple, it takes £55K every year for the License from the developer of the DMG plant. Few overheads. The feedstock for the DMG is far greater than EQT plant. The similarity between both companies is a 'huge' pipeline of potentials. Can either of them deliver ?, that is the question. Tim Yeo of PHE ( yes, the former Tory politician, so truth is not one his attributes) staters that by 2030 there will be 5000 DMG units worldwide. If this were the case, this would give PHE, on present shares in circulation, and a P/E of 15, a sp of £9. But like aandi's comment. 'EQT must be the best share on AIM', I replied with a list of 6 or 7 better ones, but mine were facts, and his comments are only words, and jam tomorrow. The reality is that the market thinks both of these shares are dogs.