Member Info for testpack3

I think Mickey is 'trawling' through 1000's of my posting history to find Aruba. lol. It's in the GoM Mickey.

Just be aware of 'Disclaimers' with every RNS announcement. The LCM sp is in free fall, after it's RNS of a few days ago. The 'Disclaimer' removes any litigation against company, for losses incurred by individuals, corporations, for decisions they might make in the light of an issued RNS. Briefly, disclaimer states 'in promoting the company, it may make announcement, which may not be wholly factual , and not to be relied upon''

Not saying this is the case with LCM, or PAT for that matter, but it's worth remembering.

Piltick. 'They are looking ar SRF not SAF'

This is a CnP from the 14 March '25 RNS, announcing the result of the £1.25M cash raise.

'

· Research and Development (£150k) - Continue work on development of alternative outputs from DMG i.e. Liquids, sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), etc as well as adding additional equipment to the feedstock testing unit (FTU) process to prove at scale;'

I can understand your confusion, since 2 months earlier, it had announced collaboration with Avioxx for supply of Syngas to it's SAF plant. Also, with it's record of 'confusing' RNS, it may well have intended to say SRF, which, as you know, is Solid Recovered Fuel, and as the name says, it is a solid, not produced from gasification. Also, not to be confused with RDF, which the RNS may have attempted to say, Refuse Derived Fuel, which, of course, includes Syngas.

How coincidental is that. After posting the last message, I was looking at the Beeb website, and the first one I see, is 3 Scientists, jointly awarded the Chemistry Nobel Prize for their work on metal-organic frameworks for Carbon Capture. CnP below from the article.

'The three scientists' work could tackle some of the biggest problems on our planet, including capturing carbon dioxide to help tackle climate change and reducing plastic pollution using chemistry.'

I was surprised that PHE announce it was 'examining' SAF production, since it had earlier stated it was in talks with Avioxx re; Syngas supply. It is not good business practice to 'compete' for sales with a customer. But that's another topic.

In any event, SAF is forecast to be huge, with global demand forecast to be approaching 20 Billion metric tonnes by 2035. That is more than 20 Trillion litres. Mind boggling numbers. If I can give a 'brief' (lol) description of processes now to produce SAF. 4 main areas I believe, there may be others being researched. The most researched method is Methanol production ( from Bio -mass or Sustainable Corn farming), and then processing this Methanol to SAF. Another method is is hydrogenation ( adding H2) to fatty acids and esters. These are waste products from chip frying for example. lol. Another one is Fischer Tropsch, where, what our interest is, Syngas is the feedstock. The one I particularly favour is hydrogenation of Carbon Dioxide , CO2. from C capture of combustion products, either by using solvents or membranes. While I believe there is a market for 'small' units to remove waste plastic, such as DMG, the problem is so huge and environment damaging, it requires a 'big' solution. This 'big' solution is the most 'not wanted'. Incineration. Huge amounts can be incinerated, but with C capture, the main objection is overcome. The 'captured' C, can then be processed as above to SAF by hydrogenation. That must surely be a 'win-win' . And don't call me Surely.

Cont...

which enabled you to 'quickly' go to my post from May 2023. I will defo. be impressed, and send hearty congrats. Of course, no-one can use AI to investigate something you posted several years ago , since all you previous history has been deleted. Isn't that unfortunate Mickey. lol So, don't deflect, answer all the questions I have raised. It's called 'debate'. and don't 'duck the question'. Where have I heard that before Mickey. ?

Morning Mickey.

You are the primeiro in Projection. Just a few examples. This is your post;

'– debate – you bleat about “facts,” but every time someone presses you, you duck the question and hide behind name-calling. that isn’t debate, it’s deflection.'

Deflection is the word I use to describe your posts. Plagiarism again Mickey. ( on that point mickey, , you defo stated that your Doctorate Thesis (lol)) was rejected on the basis that it predominantly used the work of another researcher. You did not understand the well known rule of thesis writing. Use on source, it's plagiarism, use many sources, it's called research). You have not answered one question, I have answered every one you asked of me. eg; Share ownership for 50yrs, You don't like the answer, so you deflect.) I Googled info on Phineas, ( the key word. not DrAnomoly since the blog duo stated info on the pair was reduced when DC killed them off' in the '80s, you rejected that, and still run with 'failed the google test.

I hide behind name calling. you pathological liar. You have always used profanity in name calling. I use Mickey, Fraud, Moron. Koko.

You have refused 'debate' Mickey. You know you will get stuffed. Having a Doctorate is one of the most laughable things I have read on any social board at LSE, Your education is under scrutiny, since, yes, you can Google, and read, but have difficulty understanding what you have read, and indeed posted. Example. I posted that I did not buy 1000's of Brit Petr shares, and you replied, 'what a liar, you said bought 1ooo's.' ( owtte)' Fact is, what I said was that the money I used ( or if you prefer Barclays as Brokers used) was from a buy/sell of a 1000's of shares in listed company, that acquired a much larger Private Company ( a Reverse Takeover RTO). and I specifically stated that I did not buy 1000's of BP shares. You have problems understanding written English. You also stated that it was 'graceless of me to 'trap you' with the RTO, which you know mothing about, another proof tour Doctorate is a fantasy. And to try and 'top' that, you then state I have zero credibility on this board because 'I deliberately lied about the RTO@. Yes, Moron, it's called a 'sting', and you got 'stung', big time. lol You are a pathological liar, and a fraud. proven.

There's a lot more to come Mickey. But Tempus Fugit ( wat Virgil's Georgics), especially on your AI use. I have a decent enough education to be able, with varying degrees of success, construct dialogue, and 'debate' without the need of AI telling me what to write and think. Poor you Mickey. On that point Mickey, you love the deflection on my BP share buying history so much, you have to repeat it ad nauseum. I said you 'trawled' through 1000s of my posting history to find that reference. Pray tell me, what info, and please post the date and script, of the reference I made in 'recent' posting history , which you included in your datasets,

cont....

Slappy.

Thanks for that.

I do, occasionally, cease the 'crap' with Mickey, and, for eg,. was the first, I believe, to bring Laws of Thermodynamics, Law of Conservation of Energy ( 20 t in, 20 t out) and Catalyst use in DMG. We all hope for a good result here, but the signs do not fill me with an overdose of optimism.

Hi again Mickey. Just a quickie, using the 'dataset' 'simple: teach it to detect narcissistic waste-of-space energy in forum posts —', and how many times did Koko and you come up. ? Try asking 'doesn't answer questions', 'refuses debate', 'thinks they have a Doctorate', 'on first name terms with AIM companies CEO, PDMR's. ' changes Avatar on share discussion sites frequently'. There's more Mickey, and these should only take a few minutes for 'results'. Look forward to the answers. Or is this a 'graceless post' hahahaha

Otto65. You inadvertently proved that I can Google, obviously making MickeyMouse look stupid, again. You got your Avatar from a Coffee grinder, or is it a not so discreet message that you post in Grindr. ? It could also be your first name followed by your IQ, Which I would suggest is probably the correct assumption, since you lack the ability to use narrative, only use emojis, except a the use of German on an English speaking site, and only on this PHE board. Hmmm. Get Mickey to put you in his 'dataset' and see what comes up. ?

Koko;

A few points to show who and what you are in reality.

A person only capable of narrative with AI.

A person who is paid , along with Mickey, to promote ( uberramp) a Company. In this case PHE. No 'ordinary' private investor would write, literally ( or rather AI write), millions of words with 5,6, 7, 8 full pages diatribe of information.

From your previous history, it was evident you would write something stupid, and after a few lines, there it was;

'The syngas is then used as a feedstock for fuel cells, Fischer-Tropsch reactors, or catalytic upgrading into sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), rather than being directly combusted for energy. This distinction moves it outside the scope of incineration classifications, assuming the emissions and use cases meet required thresholds.'

You naught boy, you failed to mention one of your previous 'best selling points' for DMG, namely, using the product, Syngas, to heat the furnace after initial heating with another energy source, to make the operation, 'no external heat source required'. The Syngas is combusted, and to ensure that no O2 can enter the furnace, a lambda of 1.0 or below ( google it Mickey if you know how) fuel/air ration is required.

So, in this respect, a percentage of the produced Syngas ( we have yet to be informed how much), is combusted, and therefore fails the Directive test you saw fit to 'spin' your PHE guided narrative.

For ordinary investors who just want PHE to succeed with sales of DMG, the main objective is to remove waste plastic from the environment, with a profitable operation. This may or may not include SAF, but that is not the only operation we should be 'selling', especially now that after many years, Engsolve has decided to employ a 'sales person'. Brilliant idea, one day it might invent 'advertising'.

Mickey. You have a new avatar, Otto65. Only a member since June this year, 36 posts in total, 35 posts like this;

: 😁🤣🤥💩🤡, all aimed at red, and the last one, for me. I'm honoured Mickey.

Is Otto65 another cartoon character? A google search only came up with an Otto 65 coffee grinder? Oh dear, oh dear Mickey, I've googled something else. Don't worry about that, still run with your pathological lie, 'can't even google, lol

Hi Mickey. For Koko, and other people who believe you have credibility, chew on this, your comment that you are the teller of 'facts' and want debate. Debate Mickey, is when people discuss an issue, ask questions of the other peoples beliefs, etc, and those questions are answered. It is not you, constantly spouting 'he can't google, he lies, he's a fraud, typical Dunning Kruger, changes his story, blah, blah, blah.

Fact. I offered you debate, and you refused.

Fact; Every question you have ever asked me, I have answered, fact.

Fact You have not answered one question I raised of you.

fact. You stated, 'it's impossible for him to have bought BP in the &0s', which later you amended to 'yes, it was possible to buy BP shares in the 70's.

Fact. You stated BP couldn't have been traded because the Govt did not sell any of its hares in BP 'til 1987. The Govt never held more than 51% of Brit Pet., and Brit Per was a LSE member, and traded since 1954. Google it mickey, 1954.

Fact. I CnP the google of your narcissistic cartoon character. You still choose to run with 'can't even google' You moron. I also asked if the guy on the 'cartoon podcast, fat, with a beard, was you. lol

Fact. You trawled through a 1000 posts of mine, because you were getting stuffed, to try and find 'contradictions, or some other 'smoking gun'. You found a burnt out candle.of a comment I made 3 yrs ago , showing that I had held shares for a considerably longer time than the poster I was debating with on the EML board. No-one there questioned the timescales. It wasn't deemed necessary, at that time, and on that board, with 'intelligent' investors', to run all the events of the Brit Petr share purchase. I answered your 'smoking gun', but you don't like the answer, because it doesn't fit your only narrative with me, which is all the things that you are, A liar, a fraud, a narcissist. IOW, you are a projectionist.

There's a lot more 'facts',ike these Mickey, that I will be talking about on here, but there are pages of them.

We could have a debate, one on one, when the board is quiet, but it's you Mickey, who runs away from real debate. You much prefer, to feed your ego, to just post boring, relentless narrative of projection. That is a fact Mickey.

And Mickey, no comment on me mentioning Koko posting for 2hrs + on a Wed night, ramping the hell out of PHE, which obviously, you and him are paid to do, This is why you don't want debate Mickey, because my first simple to answer question might have been. 'Why did you start a PHE TG, and how come the CEO of PHE post on it.' ? The follow up question, depending on the answer to the first question, might have been, 'you can see my posting history for the whole time I have been on LSE, 12+ years. Because of your alias changes, all your posting history has gone, except for the newly resurrected fraud avatar.. No trawling through your posts then Mickey to find 'lies'. When will you be name changing again to get your recent history

Indeed slappy, if Milton Keynes BC is 'burning' the Syngas after Gasification, it is still 'incineration, and not C friendly. It does however, reduce the 'volume' of waste material in he environment. It needs to add C capture to the system. The Directive from MKBC mentions, before Gasification, metals and plastics atre removed from the household waste 'black bags'. So, i's not really helping with the plastic problem. In the main, it look like the gasification is of Biomass material, which is degradable in any case, and jus appears to be a 'volume problem' solution. .Without knowing the full scle of the operation, it would obviously have been much better, and profitable, to use the Syngas to provide additional power needs, basically free.

Does anyone on this board, believe that Koko the Clown, and his 'my most honest and trustworthy friend Bob' ( MickeyMouse), posts for over 2 hours between 20.10 and 22.20 (c) on a Wed night, because they are normal, private, share holders in an AIM Company. The posts only praise, that's all of them, 1ooos over the years, with no dissent on PHE mngmnt or the DMG process. Name another PI who goes to that trouble and time. They are Paid uberrampers. And to further prove the point, Mickey starts his own TG, with the sole purpose of promoting PHE ( he also admits to another TG for HUI, and his on 1st name terms with Howard.lol). The CEO of PHE, Paul, has also, posted on the narcissists TG. How often do we get CEO's posting on LSE sites. ? They are paid UberRampers, obviously profoundly biased, and whose posts should be taken with a pinch of salt. Except by TheOne ( aka Mickey), who heaps praise on Kokos posts, late at night. Laughable. Haven't forgot you Mickey, I thought my offer of a debate with you, when the board has a quiet time, was scuppered by Koko, 'posting for hours,, after the sp rise, to 'chart' prove ( not his chart, but a Japanases Candle makers chart) why PHE is on the way North. That is his MO. His chart business went bust ( probably owing some people loadsa dough), but waits for a rise, then posts a chart shoeing it was predictable. They are both frauds. BTW Koko, I do owe you an apology, I only read one post of yours from last night, I knew what the others would say.

Mickey. I'll post more about your narcissism, lies, and deflection a little later, after most of the board stops laughing at Koko. Run for the hills now Mickey. There's more on my gotcha post which proved how little you know about business, and your only comment on that, was it was 'a graceless' post. lol

Yes 99, I'm sure many see the RNS as an opportunity to sell, and buy back later, possible at a much reduced price. There is one caveat I would mention though, that would scupper that plan. The is a chance, maybe only small, that The Kingdom offer a settlement, with the resulting surge in sp. Unlikely, yes, possible, yes.

Mickey. lol. It;s you who keep ''backpeddling'. You have gone from 'impossible' to 'BP was indeed quoted on the LSE before privatisation, but government held the majority, the free float was tight, and a grammar-school kid with a “flush account” wasn’t buying thousands of shares. That’s fantasy, not finance.'

Back peddling. You are a projectionist as well. Just a pathological liar. It shows how uneducated you are, not being able to understand written English, my comment was 'NOT talking about 1000s' and you lie and said I bought 1000s, Pathological liar, you can't help it.

And you dismiss the RTO Gotcha as a ;

' That’s not clever, it’s just graceless. When you have to invent lies and then brag about them, it shows you’ve got nothing else.'

It was factual and shows you no little about 'business' Our 'disagreements over the years has been about you being a fraud, and narcissist, and authoritarian. You do not have a Doctorate, and I have shown you to have little knowledge of how 'business' operates, a pre-requisite for any further business qualification. You apparently make cartoons. Perhaps you have a HNC in Graphic Design or something similar. Deflection is your forte. You do not want debate, where questions are asked, and answered. You deflect. Your most notable to date, about being a paid uberramper is this one;

'I'll answer it when you stop asking me the question.' It's a cracker Mickey.

Time for more defection Mickey, and not answering questions.

I think I give you too many defection opportunities. I believe to get you stuffed again, we should converse like this, at quiet times on the board, after the Market has closed. I will ask one question, and you can attempt to answer it. That is called 'debate' Mickey, which I can show you the post, I remember it well, it's only from a few days ago, saying that I don't want debate. It's you Mickey who runs away from debate. Agreed? A good time for me is between 4 and 5pm here, and 8 and 9pm your time. TheOne posted at 20.14 yesterday, so it should be ok for you. Bear in mind, when you revert to GMT, yr clocks go back an hour, Brasil has no 'daylight saving' alterations, Well, not anymore. It will be 3 rs difference in a few weeks time,

Re; your nonsense post about HUI. It is trying to do a deal for Inentech technology ( Plasma) with a ME company to treat waste plastic, and it has nothing to do with PHE or DMG. Well, that's the whole point Mickey, you fool, why not? You are on first name terms with a Director, a former major SH in PHE, who prefers another companies Syngas production equipment, and not DMG. Do you understand why I raised it now, or are you so stupid , it hasn't registered.

You have in the past, touted HUI as a 'possible' DMG buyer. They prefer another companies process. Tell Koko over dinner.

Hi Mickey. You have gone from 'impossible to buy', to thinly traded, and not available to a GS kid. Lol. It's you whi change the narrative. Barclays Bank are a Broker, but also, as many Brokers do, own shares. Who told you it was thinly traded. It has always been a favourite of Pension Funda. The fact is Mickey, I had BP shares, from the windfall I received from a school friend whose Dads Co was the subject of a T?O, that was the Gotcha, which proves that you are a novice in 'business' and 'share dealing'. A Commerce Doctorate. Lol. Narcissist. It was long time ago, and since my A/c, ( under supervision0, was flush with cash from the aforementioned sale, It was probably the Barclays BM who recommended I buy BP. The fact is I did, and you can't stomach it. You have no response to the Phineas Quayle key word search. I googled his Bio you fool. Now the Gotcha question. You ran with defection, your forte, that you now believe the BP buy was a 'gotcha. No it was the sale of my school friends Dads business. That business was not sold to the 'big' company to get a LSE listing, it doesn't work like that fool. The listed 'small' Company 'buys' the 'big' Company, it's called a Reverse Take Over. RTO. Google it. It acquires all the share capital of the larger company, which then has a market listing with no expensive, and time consuming IPO. The 'management of the 'big' company are now in control of the listed company, and invariably, if the 'small' company ( the shell ), was a trading outfit, the new company, after a name change, would sell the now owned smaller company back to its original owners. You didn't even spot this deliberate mistake. yes, it was lie, but a lie to show you up as have no commercial experience, a definite requirement for an individual to commence a Doctorate. You are a fraud Mickey. But more proof another time. Lets see how you spin this post.

Mickey. You can't even Google can you. Read below, and get it into your thick skull. Google result;

'Effective January 1, 1955, British Petroleum became a holding company. Beginning in 1977, the British government reduced its ownership of British Petroleum by selling shares to the public, and in the late 1980s the government turned over British Petroleum entirely to private ownership by selling its remaining shares.'

My families broker was Barclays Bank, and the local Manager was a social friend of both my parents. If the 'public' shares were in short supply, and no, I'm not saying that yhey were, I have no idea, the BM would have sold to me ( with a parent as Guardian), Barclays Bank BP owned shares. We are not talking about buying many 1000s Mickey. Now you will 'deflect' with this comment thicko. 'He said the Bank Manager sold him Barclays Bank shares in BP. ' I can read you like I can read a book. You insist on still defecting with the 'can't Google' narrative, although I did CnP the actual page from The Phineas Quayle search I did, but you conveniently ignore this, because it proves you are a liar, and full of BS. You do understand what 'key words' are in a Google search don't you. Mickey. ? DrAnomoly is not the key word, since he was a narcissistic alias. Phineas Quayle was the 'key word' which you failed to tell me about. Your nonsense about BP not being available 'til the late '80Swas when the UK govt sold another tranche of Brit Petr shares. You do not understand how LSE works, or for that matter, companies. A Doctorate. In your dreams you fool. Just a narcissists with an huge authoritarian streak. The Gotcha questions still to come. 'Run for the hills' Mickey.