Member Info for testpack3

Magoo.

What can EML RNS? It has performed what is required by the terms of the Arbitration, and has submitted the most important part - the claim and justification. investors should receive solace from that, not from a string of meaningless RNS.

Anomoly. One simple question for you, and let us see if you want discussion or debate, or, as I know, you are a serial liar. From your post;

'You are also wrong, again. My previous posts were not deleted because of an avatar change, and I have not had anything removed to hide some great archive of price predictions. That is just another one of your little forum myths, the sort you roll out when the actual argument becomes inconvenient'

The simple question is this;

Where can I see you previous DrAnomoly (lol) posts, the one you used before H2hoo and where can I see H2hoo posts, ?

Look forward to your reply (lol)

The opening line is hilarious.

'Red, just to tidy up one point before it gets turned into bulletin-board archaeology, I haven’t been calling PHE price targets for ten years. That is not really my thing. I tend to look at strategy, market positioning, commercial pathways and whether the story is getting stronger or weaker. Share price prophecy belongs in the same drawer as tea leaves, horoscopes and AIM certainty.;

This is from a Malignant Narcisssitic liar who , because of avatar changed has had his previous Anomloy postings deleted, as well as those of H2o buffoon.

We are therefore unable to check his continuing lies'

So, liar, how is PHE 'strategy, market positioning, commercial pathways and whether the story is getting stronger or weaker' working out for you. lol.

I'll give you a clue, thay are all doing very badly indeed. No

Rider. My estimated time scale of early '27 is for EML.

I thought our Litigation Council was Lit Cap. Incorrect. It's Boris Schiller Flexner as stated in the 30 March '26 RNS. This RNS also included the Memorial submitted to The Arbitrator, and includes the amount of 'damages' being £1.25B, or approx. 93p ps. It also states the Defendant will submit their response in 'a few months'. Say this is July. My timeline of a decision by early April gives the Arbitration panel some 9 months to evaluate both submissions, interview if necessary, and come to a decision. I believe this to be a reasonable timescale . Guestimate of 2028 imply the Arbitrators are 'work shy.'

Comedy act MickeyMouse posts as below;

'Red, that time is over for you and the usual numpties. I’ll gladly engage with honest doubt. I have less interest in bad-faith pantomime.' lol

I think he means 'debate', not 'doubt. lol

'bad faith pantomime ', posters avatar is from a narcissist cartoon character , the alter ego of the posters comic 'hero' from the 70's. lol.

Mickey has proved time and time again he does not want 'debate', because he gets stuffed, instead relies on lies and abuse of his foes. Does not like answering questions. Famously stated, when asked why he ha such a 'love affair' with PHE and particularly its Directors, and I suggested he was a paid 'uber ramper', he stated;

; I will tell you when you stop asking the question'.

I haven't asked that question for many, many months, still not inclined though to 'spill the beans' eh Mickey. Of course, your reply will be just abuse, not 'debate' .

ps. I bet there are many on the Telegram board who have given you some abuse .but probably not 'ETTO' and the fool oh dear swaz.

The timeline has already been set out. Expect a decision early '27.

47 p, like any other estimate is a guess. If I were an 'arbitrator', the first thing I would want know from the litigator, is how much, in real terms has been spent by it to date. It is a long way from a B£. Future profitability might come into the equation, and might not. I am not familiar with other cases under similar circumstances, and so do not know if future profits can be accommodated in the decision. I have previously made my position on why M Govt refused consent, and in a nutshell, it is to seize the asset, backed up legally, by the fact that EML did not properly address the water supply situation in a Country where drought is serious problem. If I were a betting man, and I am, since I am here invested, I would put the 'award' nearer to 10p per share, which would give a MC of about £140M, which I suspect is more than EML has spent to adte on trying to open a mine. One could trawl through every PnL account and find the actual amount invested, which I am not inclined to do. 99IC posted thsi copied below;

'Given that 1. EML's funders (for the arbitration) have a good record picking winnable cases and 2. The Arbiters are all top class (so little chance of a crazy result), there must be a high chance that they will advise Morocco that they will not win'.

I believe the 'funding company' is Litigation Capital' which has seen it's sp crater from c£1.20 a couple of years ago to 4.5 p now. It has, in the last few days, reported another 'lost' case., and has been at the centre of a few 'scandals'.

Can someone ask Tom Winifrith how PHE can be 'shorted'. There are 2 mechanisms. The most common is to use a CFD company ,eg; IG, Plus500, and instead of 'buying' a position, one simply 'sells' the position, without owning shares in that company. The problem is that these companies have rules on MC of companies they offer for trades. PHE will not be eligible. The other method is to find a Broker who can convince one of his 'holding' clients to' loan' the shares to the would be 'shorter'. The problem then is that the owner of said shares has lost control of selling that share until the shorter redeems it. Not going to happen on such a volatile share.

Since the Company has very little income, generated by Engsolve, the BOD is in the position of not being able to pay its salaries, pension payments and perks necessary to maintain a suitable lifestyle. To this end , the BOD have no alternative, but to raise funds by a further sale of shares in the Company. The offer is available to both Private and Institutional investors at the fabulous price of 0.20 pence per share.

The cash raise is necessary for payments of Directors salaries, Pension contributions and perks.

It is highly recommended that share holders request that their brokers issue 'paper' share certificates. In the likely event that the Compony collapses, they can be used to wallpaper a room.

Thanks WATM. In for a penny, in for a £. The thought has occurred to me, that if there s a successful outcome, with 'cash' being won, and the License lost, Graham will want to use that cash to buy another asset. I would sell at first opportunity.

It is welcome news. period. But it does highlight something I have been 'banging on' about for too many years. PHE management is useless at promoting their company and need a 3rd party to do it for them. Hui's track record though is far from impressive.

Wheresallthemoney.

Still here. But nothing to comment on. Possibly Jan '26.

Hi Loser. You can't stop thinking about me can you? Uses a fake Doctorate to get attention./lol. Malignant Narcissist.

Let us hope that there is no such apocalypse that DMG may be needed as crematoria. However, yes, DMG can be used, and because of the high fat content of cadavers, the operation is 'self sustaining', after initial heating, at about 1400dF. O2 needs to be supplied to the process to allow combustion. Considering the cost of cremations, it would be a very profitable operation if 20 plus could be 'fired up' together. relatives need not to be 'picky' about getting correct remains. Naturally, the gas products would be very high in oxides of Carbon. Bones do not burn ( calcium), nether do teeth. ( the teeth could be numbered with a graphite paint and the owner of said teeth would be known for relatives. The Middle East would not be a 'fruitful' area for cremation, since it is forbidden for Muslims. All said it good humour of course

Yes, woolverstone, your assertation is correct. The problem being though, it was not that obvious to EMLs BOD, who 'dragged' their feet on the very important issue of water supply, giving The Govt a reasonable excuse to 'kick them out',

You have outdone yourself MickeyMouse. Zak Mir has a track record on a par with OhDearSwazers, ie; failures. Go back to your pit , you malignant narcissist. byeee

The pathological liar MickeyMouse has exceeded himself. Rehashing of new so old it has grey hair. No mention of the 'many' interests from CMD, all of which have died a death. A liar who changed his avatar, not once, but twice, meaning that all his previous posting history has disappeared. How fortunate for him. go back to your brainwashed fan club on TG.

DC2601. I only stated what the proposed devlpmnt is about, and that PHE and Engsolve, to date, have not been active in any of those fields. Of course, in its Website, which attempts to promote business leads, it states it will' have a go ' at anything engineering related. The probability that this H2 Hub gets off the ground is remote, and I would suggest, that if it does see 'the light of day', the probability of Engsolve being involved, is about the same as Engsolve being involved in the design and manufacturing of a Hydrazine fuelled rocket ship. ?

The link that DC2601 posted relates to a H2 storage and distribution facility, not a manufacturing facility. I do not think Engsolve has expressed any commitment to either of hose fields? In a sense it is anti-DMG, since one of DMGs main features is it's small manufacturing footprint which would allow multiple sites to be used rather than relying on one or two large production capacity manufacturers with the obvious transport and delivery problems associated with H2. I posted some 10 years ago about the use of Metal Hydrides as a H2 storage system. These metals have large molecular lattice structures and are ideal for the absorption of H2 molecules. A surprising large amount of gas can be safely carried this way. I am disappointed that 10 years on, although much RnD has been ongoing, H2 fuelled vehicles still rely on gas filling stations, rather than simply replacing 'empty' solid packs with full ones.

The 'death spiral' of this share has quite a few reasons, most self inflicted, which I have detailed many times before. ie Management failings. A factor may also be the 'death spiral' of a fellow 'Pyrolysis' company Eqtec. EQT. I suspect many original holders of PHE also included Eqt in their portfolio. Both cos initial MOs were 'gas from plastic waste'. EQT focussed their operation on 'gas from biomass', and indeed have a few plants ( allegedly) operating with a few biomass feedstocks. However, their sp decline is such that its MC is now under £1/2 million. It has recently acquired he services (lol) of a well known shyster in the AIM market to change its direction. It is now looking at mineral rights in various countries. !!!!!.. I believe it has 'given up' on Pyrolysis. With both PHE and EQT ( and any others), unable to make significant headway in this field, it obviously has problems. The 'long list of prospects' from the CMD 12 months ago, is, like many other statements from this BOD, is now looking more than 'misleading'. We can only hope events in Oz and Ballymena, at least show the 'benefits' of Pyrolysis to a wider market and generate real interest.