Member Info for Tame2017

Wish I hadnt bothered - whats with the loony poster ?

How do you filter the crazy out please ?!

Nothng immediately available on ii.

I understand the AIM runs on emotion but this does seem a bit of an over reaction - the RNS doesn't say 'oopsy, no copper / gold after all, my bad'. And I've been in loss with this share since I bought it four years ago (and have just gone back into loss again after a mere couple of days basking in a 'profit'.).

I agree its important that the raise is spent well - the measure of 'well' for me is understanding what, if anything, has changed regarding revenue (other than it arriving sooner than expected). Is it still fixed as a licence fee ?

Looks like a couple of trades got 'throwy'...

Hiya - I've got to ask, why are you here on this board ? What is it you want ?

*gulps*

Sorry - getting a bit overexcited.

If it hits 10.6, not only did I hit break even today, I would have bagged too !

*just sicked up a bit

@CE - it really does ! I am not sure why I kept them tbh, but glad I did !

Only took four years !!

Welcome to the Crap Average Club !

Hi Wolves and thank you for taking the time to respond.

I had actually read this previously and had noted the optimistic pitch as well as the lack of actual detail regarding the new approach to expenditure and (potentially) future income.

Rather like the RNS, its oblique communication - it lacks specifics / definitions.

The devil is in the detail and without getting into commercials, there can be a communication that confirms the revised exp / inc split.

Assumption is still in place that this is a commercial partnership with Peel.

Imagine how we might feel if for the first Protos, we ponied up the funds for the costs but didnt get any increase in revenue. There can still be a business case for that (first customer etc etc) but wouldnt it be nice to know ?

Perhaps I (still) don't like surprises :)

Have I missed something ? Has it been confirmed (rather than interpreted) how the funds will be used and what the expenditure / income approach is now ?

https://www.ii.co.uk/analysis-commentary/how-alternative-energy-beat-oil-and-gas-aim-2020-ii514770

*hopes link goes through....

I don't think I actually spent one day in profit with this share - with my magic midas touch, as soon as I bought them, they dropped and its been a slippery slope since with one consolidation. I've been in for nearly four years I think. It haunts me.

Woah ! 4581% up in EUA - thats great work.

I can never decide whether avergaing down is a throwing good money after bad - I usually opt not to.

I've only just got disciplined about having (and keeping) a diverse portfolio. That being said, I am still thinking about lots of 'what if !' had I chucked more into PHE which is doing nothing near 4581% (if it did, I would wet myself).

Really ??! or is this your Friday kindness !

It would be good to understand who is responsible for what in terms of the project/ expenditure and how revenue will work now things have changed. Do let us know TY.