Member Info for Surin

Jo, I can understand your position. But why would Sidara want WG? Surely the Investors, lenders and Management see/ought see more value. Icecool has a longer term perspective. JO you would sell any asset at a profit, that's scary. Why scary...you lose regulatory control...its neo-liberal ideology...

JO, given, your rightly focus on cash flow, what is the current cash flow shortage?

There may more than clash flow...opportunistic takeover

What is the current cash flow shortage? That's assuming cash flow is the issue...

JO, we share our opinions/analysis of whats happening, we aim to support our respective thinking, we may succeed in passing/infecting...but ...hey humans are pretty thick...and our world remains iterative.

JO, the RNS releases do not reflect underlying trajectories. Equally, past accounting records do not reflect cash flow and profitability. I accept that WG ought to be past/pres/future business in all respects. But its not, sadly, not least due to Covid and Inflation....£/$250m is insignificant...historical contracts in a low interest environment are a problem.

Are you referring to the new orders?

I will not be voting on directors at AGM, I leave the large institutions to drive that play (in which, of course, I am meaningless).

I will vote if directorate change outlining an alternative, and financed, strategy is proposed. That would imply a whole new dynamic...lets see what happens...

JO, are you even sure that the £/$ 250m will be needed?

So many suppositions...let it all unfold....I don't imagine Sidara, WG Instis, WG Creditors etc. know how it ends...its a negotiation within the protection of suspension, and a very volatile external world.

WG seem to be doing alright...seems WG is the equiv of Miele/Siemens of the engineering world. Support remaining , quality UK/Scottish engineering...don't start me on water and Scottish `snowballs'

Usersteve, I am curious about what you think about the future of blockchain and crypto...

Seems to me 2X400 trades accounted for the movement...not worth spending time on...

Robert, seems to me the OTC market is small with big price swings. I would not rely, nor base any expectations on it. Have faith, and let it be...

Https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/wdgjf

big variation between this and Yahoo, both, apparently, updated today

Https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/quote/WDGJF/

I think the above is more up to date...dont think it tells us much...

Https://www.upstreamonline.com/exclusive/-there-s-more-20k-coming-says-wood-top-executive/2-1-1821927

Sm...have you added anything that is not known? Evaluation, contextually salient, of course, is important...

do they mean anything...qty seems sp****. in the meantime, sidara sat at table, wg board playing a game...no doubt with some insti backing...so let it unfold.

"...Wood and Sidara are continuing to engage with Wood's lenders and noteholders in relation to both the Debt Modifications and the Sidara Liquidity Arrangements ... and, Wood is continuing to work with its auditor towards the publication of Wood's audited accounts for the financial year ended 31 December 2024...

[dealine] not later than 5.00pm on 12 June 2025 [but] can be further extended with the agreement....

....There continues to be no certainty that an offer will be made by Sidara even if the pre-conditions to the Possible Offer are satisfied or waived. This announcement is being made with the consent of Sidara"

All very clear to me...Sidara are sitting, WG are sitting...all waiting to see if something can turn the trajectory..

Robert, you might get some philanthropy from Bill Gates if you are addressing global issues...others ..its money for mars and, or, self enrichment. Dont delude yourself.

I dont have access to those those in the `green' box....`This message has been filtered, please adjust your filters to view'. I really have no desire to hear anything the deplorables might have to say. However, if reasoned, critical balanced evaluation was offered, I would be part of the `population of the willing'. Please let me know that time to listen to critical evaluative has arrived, and the `deplorables' are no longer deplorable. Much appreciated.