Member Info for stu485

HT,

Hemogenyx!

Your memory not too good !

AIMO

HFH,

A reasonable suggestion. I hope you’re right.

HH,

It’s not trickery, only a simple and direct question.

Q, Why wouldn’t they offer a timeline for Cart-T IND submission?

Yes there’s been a recent RNS confirmation of progress BUT let’s also consider the fact Pumpky’s keen on reminding all, the company advised they were in final throw’s last year!

Given the amount of time elapsed, yes i do think it reasonable and professional for the company to offer a timeline for submission.

I’m awaiting a proper answer as to why they wouldn’t if all fine ?

AIMO

HT,

In actuality you mean you can’t properly answer what should be a concerning question for all invested.

At least we’ve established there’s no reasonable answer from those present on this forum.

My concern only grows !

AIMO
Ps Mr Mouse, how’s the book? They been up the hill yet to fetch the pale of water?

HT,

So the best you can manage is the third waffle answer I anticipated!!

Yes, other Pharma’s give timelines like any responsible business should and can should they choose.

So let’s put aside the ridiculous answer that it’s too difficult to offer a timeline, my question still stands!?

Any considered, researched answers? … I’m all ears !

AIMO

I still want to know ?

Don’t try and bury reasonable questions with stupid comments!

Pumpky,
Well said .

I want to know, if all is going swimmingly with the submission, then why not make public a timeline ?

The fact they haven’t makes me doubt my investment.

Would like to hear why others think it makes sense not to offer a timeline on submission ? Genuine question.

AIMO
Ps Please don’t come back with drivel about trusting science and Pharma requires patience or not wanting to slip on targets , as all are just waffle !

Chris 123,

You’re making a massive assumption that Cart-T gets submitted and approved. It may not and then SP will fall below 1p using same logic!!

I expect we will get positive news soon but the longer we don’t and Hemo’ choose not to offer a time line to submitting, the great the risk in my opinion.

AIMO

“Trust the science “

The most worn out, undefinable and obvious ramp phrase!

Q, Who really understands the intricacies of the particular science and why it will work or fail !?

A, Only scientists involved in the specific field.

So please, stating trust the science is ridiculous !

AIMO

HFH & Mr Mouse,

Mr I makes valid comments on the business and progress.
You on the other hand only seem to be interested in personal and pathetically conceived insults.

Mr I , please post whenever.

AIMO

Given the silence following the confirmation all Cart-T manufacturing completed successfully, i’m starting to think the word “Manufacturing” has a deeper significance.

Could it mean that other none manufacturing elements are still to be completed prior to the submission?

I know there’s a statement confirming the IND submission is now being compiled.
I wonder if other works to the FDA’s approval are involved within the compilation which may not be straightforward?

The company could very easily allay any doubt by issuing a timescale for IND submission which would no doubt help the SP.

As time ticks on, the fact they haven’t becomes more concerning!

AIMO

Pumpky,
As my history, i think I’m one of the most suspicious of any and all RNS’s and agree you need to be very careful not to read into them your own hopeful beliefs.

On this occasion, given the previous history in preparation for the submission the worst case i could foresee is one more step in the process, whereby the company announces the requirement to introduce FDA feedback and subsequent delay prior to IND RNS.

Worst case !

I think and hope those discussions have already taken place and IND RNS drops next week.

AIMO

HT,

I don’t think the lack of IND RNS is shocking, a little disappointing maybe.

I suspect they’re engaged with the FDA and most likely incorporating their feedback into the submission.

Right now I’d rather they make sure it’s a cast iron submittal document as the consequence of getting knocked back by the FDA in anyway, doesn’t bare thinking about!

Next week my guess.

AIMO

HH,
I’m now expecting Cart-T to go clinical very soon and i will most definitely congratulate the company when it does.

I’ve no idea what to expect SP to jump to, only that it should be a bloody big jump from here!

CBR …sorry not convinced in anyway but hopefully proven wrong…again !

AIMO

Digitt,
Despite what HT might say/think, i was already in !

HT,

Just for you…i was wrong in suspecting there was a problem with the process.

More than happy to have be proven wrong.

Although we’re clearly different characters i suspect we’ll have little to argue over going forward.

Can i join the gang !?

AIMO

Mr Mouse,

How about we all enjoy the good news and leave the insults for another day !

Check out my earlier posts today. Coincidence ??

At last some news on progress !

As JFH and others, it would have been nice to offer time scale on submission but will take any good news at the moment.

Can’t see why a carefully produced submission would get knocked back given the third party thumbs up, so now i’d have to move myself to the “ when” and not “if” camp with pleasure and gratitude!

AIMO

Mr I,
Hopefully you’ve re-read the PQ3 RNS and understand it’s not as you may have first thought?

Fingers crossed it all works out for you & me !

AIMO

HT,

Should the Cart-T RNS not materialize we’ll probably all get that opportunity soon again !

AIMO