REMINDER: Our user survey closes on Friday, please submit your responses here.
Seawolf,
Provided Prevail are contracted for the Ph1 works to the value of their investment, i suspect they would not care one way or the other.
The warranties involved with their investment will ensure that happens.
I wouldn’t worry to much though on the, going private risk as Dingo’s going to reassure all with a post he claims is the company assurance they will not go down that route.
Dingo !?
AIMO
Actually i’d agree with Haywain’s thoughts on first patient likely outcome and so Ph1 patient trial, IF and when it happens, is not my main concern.
The interim period and funding is!
The large short position opened is not mine and like others, i have no idea when news will drop on just how and when the funding issue will be addressed.
Mr I, please give it a rest with the stale Mcap argument.
JFH over did it too and look what position he’s now in !?
AIMO
DYOR
Ps I’ll not be replying .
Haywain, your recent posts regarding Ph1- first patient are all efficacy related.
We all know Ph1 is predominantly a safety study, so why no mention of safety stats?
In your defence and on a very quick look, I can’t see any asking for your scientific and unbiased opinion on safety, so let me please.
Could you please advise the typical CRS incident rate with Car T treatments ?
Also, in the unfortunate event of a severe CRS incident in Patient 1, do you believe the trial would continue?
Thanks in advance.
AIMO
DYOR
Haywire,
I’m happy you reminded me.
Yes , at present my prediction on the FDA’s concerns( not mine !) on the issue raised, has not resulted in any significant impact to those therapies and as such, presently my opinion has proven incorrect.
Always happy to stand corrected .
How is it , ahead of time your repeated posting of maybe 3 patients being dosed , ( very specific) and now the company confirming the same are so precise?
Congratulations on being spot on !!
AIMO
HT,
I’ve previously answered you !… No.
I think Dhub mentioned he was . Maybe he can help you with whatever related question you have.
Probably you could give Shicky some more details with respect to his/her question as a knowledgeable LTH.
AIMO
Shicky,
Check out C4X and their recent RNS’s should you want to learn more on the de-listing and private company theme.
I’m not suggesting Hemo’ will , although many here intimating within recent posts, the possibility and logic to do so.
Maybe ask one of those posters for more details.
AIMO
Chaps,
Unlike others here, I’m very happy to answer your question.
My opinion on the timing of the previous placing was based on two aspects;
One, company announcements & two , the so called LTH’s (a specific group) postings and predictions on this board.
That same specific group are now making noises ( at least three recent and separate posts) of the possibility of de-listing and the company going private!
It’s interesting others have now recognized the MO of said same group.
Any other questions?
AIMO
HK,
Why did you specifically mention a company who recently de-listed , when it had no relevance to the point you were communicating within your earlier post ?
Some may have perceived as a threat of such action , particularly if you were to believe JHFH’s conviction of who you really are !
Hopefully he’s wrong.
AIMO
HK,
Yeah, let’s stop the speculation !
We should all just wait to find out how the company is going to raise/secure the significant funds it says it needs.
( Company RNS ,…fact).
As a person keen on quoting stats, maybe you could work out for all to consider;
-of the previous funding rounds what percentage were none diluting to the relevant holders at raise.
I suspect a stat your not so keen to share !
AIMO
Isn’t it interesting, some might consider telling, how over a very short period, the ramp gang are now falling over themselves to claim a dilutive placing’s a really good thing, when a day or two prior, there was not a cat in hell’s chance!
Mr I , if you want to turn stones over and potentially expose individuals for having inside information, i’d suggest you look at such posters!.. one in particular.
AIMO
Hiki,
Why would funding most likely be dilutive with such a bright future.
JFH has told us all Hemo’ have a cure for all viruses and cancer, are u saying given that , Hemo’ can’t get none dilutive funding?
Pick an argument and think it through before u post !
AIMO