Member Info for stu485

Sorry Haywire….No !

Firstly i note the crew are no all hiding behind success rates of Ph1 “safety”, yet they repeatedly bring efficacy into the same discussion.

How about we consider “ trial” success to mean through to a useful treatment?

Now tell me the success rate to date within similar ( don’t have to be exact) AML trials !!!!?… no thought you might not want to answer that with a %.

JHFH who cares if safe if ultimately no clinicaly significant efficacy …!?

Absolutely and categorically disagree of SP explosion on any CR announcement. Why ?

Because the big boys know Durability of some significance also required .

Do i think CR will be announced , possibly as again i repeat, it’s not unusual in AML trials.

At that point the crew will be pumping like crazy and then get out prior to the probable and very sad relapse often the case with AML.

Safety without significant efficacy = worthless

Efficacy without significant Durability = worthless

Haywire, I’ll await any CR announcement at which point and despite the ramp gangs best efforts, you’ll be eating humble pie.

AIMO

GL P1 & P2.

Pingu,

Well i did think you could at least read, but clearly not !

Go check the clinical trial objectives as stated by the company. You may then realise your glaring error.

Again, you’re only encouraging others to look back at my first post to ponder why there’s such a scramble to bury it .

Please keep going as many more might be enlightened.

Have a good day Mr 99 & 95%

AIMO

GL P1&P2.

JHFH,

Yep quickly try and cover my post as normal.

Don’t you think others might have wised up to that and it simply encourages them to look back and consider what & why you’re trying to bury it !?😉

Strange you’re not arguing with any of the point i’ve raised regarding the science. I thought that’s what you wanted to be more prevalent here?

No go run and get Daddy Haywire.

AIMO

Pingu,

What a load of BS !

Are you aware that most similar trials sadly fail ?

Are you aware no clinically significant efficacy is proven?

Are you aware CR could now have been demonstrated but nothing communicated, what might that suggest?

Are you aware even if clinically significant efficacy or even CR is demonstrated, durability of response is still then required and that takes a long time?

You probably are but you and others don’t care!

It suits your agenda to spout half truths and magnify possibilities rather than the actual probability.

So you state, it’s 99% big pharmaceutical will buy out!

Maybe your percentage accuracy is as reliable as JHFH when he repeatedly stated 95% sure of no CH !!

Your team’s looking very transparent even to those with minimal research . Up your game or shut up and give Haywire the baton.

AIMO

GL P1&P2

There’s a bunch of so called investors here who…are not !

They are here to try and entrap others to invest at a time to suite their and others self interests and will use many different methods to do so.

JHFH for example only recently posted that the company already knows the treatment works. Any researched investor knows , can’t yet be the case from a big pharmaceutical company investment perspective but , he knows the majority here are not well enough researched to know that.

Be careful, a bunch of very determined and dishonest rampers in play here, Mr I etc.

AIMO

🤞pt1

Mr I,

Were you the investor you claim to be (clearly not !),

then you too should be asking the question of current efficacy signals. The fact you don’t, speaks volumes.

Haywire will know, it’s not that unusual to see a Complete Response in such early tests, yet no mention of the type of signal to date.

Yes i know ph1 is for safety but let’s not forget secondary efficacy signals as mentioned in clinical test and the much trumped real time prevail monitoring…yet nothing of substance communicated?

Yes Haywire i know early days but i think even you would accept sufficient time has passed to possibly see CR if indeed it’s occurred.

Good luck p1, good luck HT

Mr I…you’re a clown.

AIMO

HT,

Unless Kingpin has a time machine and can fast forward at least 6 months, he and no one else can determine “Efficacy” of a significance and durability of which you are trying to foresee.

You’re falling into the rampers trap of creating a false narrative that “positive results “ of the type big pharma would most likely require prior to significant investment, are already or very soon to be known….not the case !

It might be the case in six months 🤞

AIMO

Clinical

Hopefully, positive early signs & fingers crossed for patient No1.

Investment

As much as i despise the ramp gang for their endless misleading posts, i have to agree with them on the potential value here should a significant and durable response be achieved.

Given the above, ordinarily at this juncture i might be tempted to invest and hence my renewed interest.

However, with what i consider to be the recent blatant insider information made public, combined with the debacle (some state “betrayal”) of the recent raise, it’s not for me.

Good luck

AIMO

Haywire,

You’re proving my point !

Keep it up and some others might even see through you.

Nothing more from me until next RNS.

AIMO

Haywire,

Careful that was very nearly the reality but at least you have openly corrected HFH’s BS !

The point is, as I’ve mentioned over and over. “Durability “ of response is the nemesis of potential AML treatments.

As you know, even those that may demonstrate strong efficacy or even a Complete Response often are not durable and therefore in layman’s terms, ultimately do not “work”.

Again, as you know this is a particular and well understood issue with AML and why big Pharma’s are unlikely to pile in until some signs of Durability’s demonstrated.

You just can’t bring yourself to offer a straight forward and succinct explanation. You prefer to muddy the waters with bias wrapped within a scientific bow. I wonder why!?

We will only ever agree on our hope Durability is demonstrated,long lasting and many have opportunity for an effective treatment.

AIMO

HFH,

“In short, we'll know whether this therapy works soon enough”

Utter BS and even Haywire , if he has an honest bone in his body, would have to admit the same !

To “work” there would need to be “Durability” in response long enough to at least be of use as a bridging therapy. Hopefully it would be much longer though, suitable as a new treatment.

That will require 6months as a minimum to prove.

Haywire, want to comment?

Yes , we may know first signs of safety profile and clinical response, but to state as a fact to others that we will know if it “works” soon , is untrue and misleading.

Why would you do that?

AIMO

Haywire,

Just as expected, you’ve completely ignored the plight of the others i highlighted…i wonder why !?

…and nope , I didn’t “attack on the science “ i simply put forward opinions and other more technologically advanced potential solutions, which you vehemently dispelled in such a bias non-scientific manner, it showed me all I needed to know of your motivation.

A different time zone but even getting late here, so good night and sleep well.

AIMO

HT,

I sleep easy!

I’ve never deceived in my posts

I’ve never tried to deliberately encourage or discourage investors

I’ve never had inside information

I’ve never shorted this stock

I’ve never accepted the many clandestine offers of recruitment to the ramp gang for personal financial gain

So, now Haywire’s been put back in his place and hopefully reflecting on his role., pray tell mine HT.

AIMO

Haywire,

Some would argue that mental health illness is as much a curse as many other serious diseases, including cancer.

So respectfully, please take a good read of a number of recent posts by some brave enough to admit, their desperate mental state caused ( their words ) by investment in Hemogenyx and how they perceive the company has treated retail investors in the quest to “cure cancer”

So climb down from your imaginary moral high horse and consider, YOU and other prolific posters here have paid a part in their misery.

Well done !

AIMO

Maybe two board changes , one new and one change.

Peter might move on and a replacement appointed. Also a new commercialisation Dir appointed.

The “in” crowd here always sign post whats coming and suggest all will be fantastic when it happens.

They do so to promote a positive spin in their attempts to ensnare new investors for their own financial gain.

Let’s see .

AIMO

Boom07,

You’re absolutely correct regarding Haywire !

He does have very detailed scientific knowledge and uses it to disguise his obvious bias and agendas .

Unfortunately many here are not as well researched on the science as they think and that’s why most are yet to smell the same rat as you and i .

To those holding and deep underwater, even i think/hope there’s still a chance this may eventually come good and i wish you well with whatever decision you make.

Just be very careful in believing some of the infamous posters here.

AIMO

Good luck No 1.

JHFH,

Nice to see you’ve put the insider information shovel down today. Maybe after a further chat with the FCA !?

Anyway, there’s a couple of problems with your latest explanation of the recent raise.

1. Surely the “Institutional investor” is holding and not selling as you claim ?

Only you told everyone that the consolidation would finally eradicate such activity and that it’d never happen again.

Would you mind explaining to all which of your statements was/is incorrect please.

2.You claim the “institutional investor” would not have known “results” . Strange that as you’ve claimed to know results or are you retracting that statement which you knowingly placed within the public domain?

AIMO

Dhub,

Thank you for your kind words.

Yes, when you bunch can’t answer a valid question, the one all holders should be asking, “why the need for such a massive discount if we can believe what JHFH claims”, then your go-to response is always abuse to try and distract from the validity of the question(s).

Too transparent, try something original!

AIMO

Ps who said things are going badly ?…not me!

DCt55,

You’re as presumptuous with your reading of my standing as you are the RNS.

I will though do as requested, just as soon as JHFH provided reasonable answers to the questions I’ve raised or there’s another RNS describing progress all as JHFH’s claims.

AIMO

Just to add.

Either you JHFH or the company better make a statement of fact with clarity very quickly to prevent a “misleading event” of which i’m pretty sure , others will not ignore .

AIMO