Member Info for stokey12

Hottrader - I posted my post at 16.20 last night and could not have seen your post this morning as I had more important business to attend to. I am only now catching up with my holdings. Due to other commitments I am unlikely to make any purchases before the end of the summer.

15L - That is the second time this year that Investors Chronicle has tipped SXX hopefully it will lead to upward movement on the share price

OR Is there any chance that you could please post the FT article

Turnpan - It is done for the people like me who are not on ADVFN who might be interested in the post. It also means we are able to get a broad range of views.

It is starting to look as if the share price may be about to flatline until there is any significant news. The share price has not moved for the last four trading days. Is any news expected before the year end results are due in August. In my view as far as the year end results are concerned the forward looking statements would need to say something other than the two contracts have slipped into this financail year for the price to move.

One thing that struck me and has not been discussed much is the comment in the RNS about how the price has been calculated. This agreement is priced by reference to the benchmark of a related product. Why did they change to this method of calculation if they were going to keep to the same base price. I suspect that SXX is trying to get the rest of the TorPs at a higher price.

AndyG - I have got Brazil

Allgrins - They would only do that if they want to get in trouble with the regulators for holding on to price sensitive news.

My suspicion is that this is am initial agreement that will lead to further agreemnt for other countries in the region. Did anyone note the way the statement on the price was phrased. It says 'benchmarked against a relevant product.' This is not the same wording as in other RNSs. The crucial question is what is the benchmarked product?

Fred16 - So selling the hubby has been discounted?

Hopefully they will come back with some nice contracts. Or an agreement with the IFA to give its members access to Poly4

AlanG - You do not know if there were any unreported trades which are responsible for the drop in the price.

I do not think the Home Office would give us a license without the agreement of the Drugs Ministr's husband. Although he might be interested in some Poly4

iInterestingly if anybody looks at the post from this morning called POTUS opened his mouth there is a guess at how the share might end up.

I do not normally comment on share price before 10am,however, today I will make an exception. That great business expert, POTUS, has threatened further tariffs on Chinese goods this may lead to adverse market pressure. We could therfore see another 2-4% knocked off the share price due to market volatility.

Normally TSTR would not be liable for the actions of a subsidary but as I am not as well informed about the strcuture of TSTR and its trading subsidiary I am attachig a link that might be of interest https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=0df5fe1e-29cb-4255-9f25-f252f7f1db17&utm_source=lexology+daily+newsfeed&utm_medium=html+email&utm_campaign=lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&utm_content=lexology+daily+newsfeed+2018-06-19&utm_term=

Myosotis - Thanks for this what I find most interesting is the difference between slide 2 and slide 3 this shows to me an impressive amount of progress in less than six months. If all aspects of construction work go in a similar way then there is achance that the Q1 2021 first polyhalite target being reached.

Fred16 - No need to worry about the new money NHSE has spent it all on new committes and working groups

KnightTrader - I note what you say I would only add that your comments would equally apply to Hottrader77 who also goes in for name calling especially when contradicted.

OldR - While not disputing what you say I note that in one recent presentation it did show first revenues being in 2021. So first production is likely being planned for 2021 as well.