Member Info for stokey12

Jettydog In relation to your 10.59 post I am invested in both EQT and PHE and my view is that they are both likely to move into profit about the same time. PHE only nees to sell 2 - 3 DMG units to be profitable. The license fee ia payable annually so it is not a question of having to sell 2- 3 a year. Protos is one so they only need to selltwo more to be profitable. I suspect from some statements within the annual report that Peel is moving to apply for panning permission on the next couple so it is quite possible that three will be operational next year.

In addition there are payments for exclusivity agreements if agreements in addition to Peel are concluded this year then PHE might ven break even this year.

FlyingHorse1 In relation to your 10.56 post judging from what LedZep has said it looks like PHE are on course to start construction when the breeding season ends in September. So I would give a cautious yes i aswer to your question.

Goggles In relation to your 10.09 post gasification as a technology for converting waste into plastic has not as far as I am aware been proven commercially. There is support for the case that it does work. Both PHE and EQT are moving towards commercial deployment. PHE has had its processes independently checked by a reputable organisation and a demonstration model is working at the PHE testing facility on the University of Chester campus.

Does anyone know what time the EU Commission will be launching its hydrogen strategy?

Kenny100 In relation toyour 09.44 post when you say PHE could be a billion pund company are you referring to annual license fees or to market cap or both. If both I would agree with you.

Ghengis63 In relation to your 09.19 post if you read yesterday's report from the APPG on Hydrogen I doubt you will see very little discussion on gasification. PHE gets as far as I am aware one mention and thatas a contributor of evidence. The problem is that gasification in general is not an accepted way of producing hydrogen. Until there is a working DMG unit that is able to show that gasification works in practice that is a view that is unlikely to change. It should also be noted that as gasification is likely to prove cheaper than electrolysis both in capital costs to build and to produce vested interests may be in play.

evanw - In relation to your 08.11 post that is an individual judgement call based on personal circumstances and your own research. You should not base your decision on anything said by another poster.

I note that hydrogen is not mentioned in the main BBC story on this. According to the BBC Political Editor the focus will be on Jobs. But there has been a lot of pressure to announce a hydrogen strategy from all sides so we will have to wait and see.

Mattayre In relation to your 19.28 post of yesterday if you look at the trade price column when the trade price is within the spread for the share the price will remain the same as normally the share price is the mid point between the buy and sell prices. It only took me three years to work that one out.

willy1946 In relation to your 11.08 post of yesterday sorry for taking so long to respond had internet issues yesterday. You have given me much to think about. At least I have the time to do it. Harlabd and Wolfe sounds like possibly being a good income stream but it did go bust once before so cause for a pause to think.

Looking at the spread i am wondering if there is a shortage of shares available. I saw on another board somebody said a big spread means that the shares are in short supply I am not sure if that is true. We hada similarly large spread last week as well.

If I remember correctly from the Annual Report and going through all the RNS there are 3.5m warrants outstanding.

The APPG on Hydrogen report on how hydrogen can help the post CoVid economic recovery has been published and can be found here https://connectpa.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Hydrogen-APPG-Report-2020.pdf

cj1500 In relation to your 09.35 post if the warrants will expire on 6 August then the holders have until then todecide whether to exercise the warrants and buy the shares at the exercise price. You are correct regardless of what the market price is on the day they will only pay the exercise price.

As the statement will be about 12.30 depending on whether PMQs overrun or any other statements I would expect some kind of reaction around 2pm. I am hoping that the reports that Protos will be among the shovel ready projects that will get funding proves correct.

I am considinginvesting in this company proably next month after doing my research. One thing that I would like to know is can anybody tell me why the share price is so low? While a low share price could be a good opportunity to buy in cheap it could also be a warning. Can I ask for a frank assessment as to why the share price is so low.

I see from here https://www.londonstockexchange.com/stock/PHE/powerhouse-energy-group-plc/company-page?lang=en that the closing price was just below the 52 week high. Fingers crossed that the 52 week high is breached tomorrow. Of course if it is yellowf1 is buying the drinks.

Looks like we may see a new 52 week high sometime this week and yelloef1 will be uing the drinks.

For those who might find it useful an independent financial analysis of PHE can be found here https://jmp.sh/NepYj7Z

testpack3 In relation to your 01.06 post we might see the first hint of any possible government strategy on Wednesday when the Chancellor makes his fiscal statement. Interestingly that happens to be the same day that the EU officially announces its hydrogen strategy.