Member Info for stokey12

Scaffman ref 09.08 post Yes I noted that as well after posting my 07.52 post.

LWHL ref 07.46 post As I said the other day on this board there is a theoretical appeal to the Supreme Court but it is not of right and permission is needed to bring it. The other issue is cost assuming that HARL are successful then even getting to the point of asking for permission will not be cheap.

This LinkedIn post about the cable barge being constucted has been posted before I am reposting it to highlight the interesting comment from martin M. I think this is a first that I have seen hopefully HARL comms will pick it up. https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7206319362415210496/?commentUrn=urn%3Ali%3Acomment%3A(ugcPost%3A7206319361614102528%2C7206396348722495488)&dashCommentUrn=urn%3Ali%3Afsd_comment%3A(7206396348722495488%2Curn%3Ali%3AugcPost%3A7206319361614102528)

Kaeren ref 16.56 post I was just going to post this. So it would be job finished in about a month.

Coops_ ref 15.53 post do you have a link for this behind the paywall?

LSE03 ref 16.24 post vesselfinder has three tugs in port they are GPS Arcadia, Wave Spirit and Jupiter they have all appeared to have arrived in five minutes of each other.

Saoirse12 ref 14.52 post The appeal has been heard on Monday we will hear the decision on the appeal. The curren thinking is that it will go in HARL's favour. My only concern is that Consuela is among those saying that it will go in HARL's favour and her record of predicting matters is not ideal.

I am confused yesterday we were told that 98% of the people had voted for strike action. Now it is 100 GMB workers. For both statements to be true that means that 102 of the workers at Belfast are members are GMB members. I cannot recall how many staff work at Belfast but I am sure that it is more than 102.

SYN00GOLD ref 12.09 post Very interesting hopefully it proves right.

Bridgedogg1 ref 08.08 post yes bu it is not an appeal as of right you would need leave of the Supreme Court to bring it and that is not a given.

I have a question this 98% vote what is the 98% of? As I see it there are a number of possibilities:-

98% of the people voting

98% of the members of the union

98% of the employees at Belfast

98% of all HARL employees

Depending which of these it is you canot tell how much support there actually is.

Dawski37 ref 10.52 post It is not that simple. First at least two of the three judges need to agree on the decision. Also they need to agree on the why as what they decide will set a precedent. Secondly, they will have other cases to hear which would raise equally important points of law. As one of the judges was the Lady Chief Justice she would have other duties as well. Thirdly once they have agreed on the decision they need to draft and agree the judgement or write their own judgements if they cannot agree on the reason for the decision and it has to be typed.

Chrisatrdg ref 08.56 post I think the reason it was not showing before is because the judgement had not been written so they did not know when it was going to be handed down. Once the list office had been informed it was listed. (Not having a go.)

Danielm89 ref 13.48 post if yoou must lift information from a document can you please credit where it came from. Also I note that the informtion is out of date as it refers to the High Court Judgement and the Court of Appeal Judgment is coming next week.

scaffman ref 11.31 post actually i was referring to the annual amount of work that the mod is obliged to place with them under terms of business agreement. if you google bab**** terms of business agreement you will see what i mean.

Just seen this thread on twitter by Navy Lookout. I wonder is Navy Lookout actually promoting the idea of HARL being given the Project Euston tender? HARL would in my opinion need to be careful not to be seen to be lobbying either directly or indirectly. https://x.com/NavyLookout/status/1799723091192434964

ConsuelaII ref 10.36 post If the result of the JR favours HARL then I would expect a modest rise. Whether we see 20p would in my view depend om what the share price does this week. If it goes up in anticipation then 20p is possible. If it however stays around where it is now then I do not see 20p. The interesting thing is whether there are any leaks. While a leak would be a comempt of court and even with the restricted circulation of a draft judgement there are enough peole who would have sight of the draft to not rule it out. The other issue is will we see any other news as well.

LSE03 ref 19.19 post do you have a copy of this article that is not behind a paywall.

Just came across this on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7205117787571171328/ the post says:-

Harland & Wolff Marine Services Ltd 744 followers 2 hours ago

Harland & Wolff Marine Services has had a very busy first half of 2024, with multiple projects in place and more to start, we have also seen expansion through the fleet with adding more vessels in, much more exciting things are planned for 2024 and beyond, I will be exhibiting at Seawork 2024 this year outside on stand Q15, come say hi 👋 if you have any questions/enquires or would like to just chat. hashtag#HWMS hashtag#Seaworks2024 hashtag#Workboatshow hashtag#Workboats hashtag#Landingcrafts

There is a video on the link.

Deep-Sea ref 17.03 post technically whoever loses can petition the Supreme Court for leave to appeal. However, I would be surprised that a petition for leave was to succeed.