GreenRoc Accelerates their World Class Project to Production as Early as 2028. Watch the full video here.
Consuela ref 19.30 post two observations. Firstly, as I said to you before and you did not respond I look at the quality of the senior management and do they have the contacts and experience to carry out their jobs. They are doing the day to day work. Secondly, you are going back sixteen years I would be surprised if any CEO does not have at least failed company.
Also I note that on checking JW at companies house his list of directorhips shows only one dissolved company that was in 2018. See this link https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/officers/Plcqu9fe3dy6V0i27ZoAhk8Feec/appointments There is no evidence of any Director Disqualification Orders I also checked here https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/search/disqualified-officers?q=John+MacInnes+Wood&page=6 and could fin nothing. This tells me that what ever you may think JW has never done anything that warranted being banned a company director.
Broomtree ref 11.16 post I was under the impression that the three FSS ships were to be done one after another but you seem to be implying they will be done altogeher.
There was some discussin yesterday about the question of capacity for HARL to do the FSS and Titanic II if it ges ahead. If you look at this page https://www.harland-wolff.com/facilities/belfast/ It would seem that the two may be able to be built side by side. I note what broomtree says about the facilities that were removed by Fred Olson when he was in charge. However if HARL was to bid I would expect them to have plans to deal with the issue.
Broomtree ref 10.16 post When you look at the available shipyard capacity worldwide then you will see that there are only about three shipyard companies that would have then drydock capacity to do the work including HARL. Mr Cameron has said that he does not want to go to the far east that knocks out the majority of drydocks of suitable size if I recall correctly. The only issue I have is whether then beam in the main dock is wide enough to take both a FSS ship and Titanic II. I know from a previous year when we had eight or nine ships berthed in Belfast that HARL can take more than one ship in a dock at a time. So I would say that it is doable with proper planning
I have just checked the dimensions and the main dock can comfortably handle the dimensions. As Mr Plamer has indicated it will be a European shipyard this will reduce the number of yards that can do the build.
I do not think money will be much of a problem for him. while he might not need the UKEF funding I am sure that might help persuade him. Plus the idea of the same shipping company to build the replacement might be intersting.
Lottie123 ref 07.51 post I am not sure that restricting the supply of HARL shares by a share buyback programme would be of much affect. It would in my opinion be of use if there is a demand for shares. I note that earlier this week there was a comment that some institutional investorsare holding back pending the resolution of the new debt facility. If that is the case then a share buyback programme in advance of the new debt facility is unlikely to help.
While the cost of any buyback at the current share price would not cost much I would not support a buyback unless there is clear evidence of effectiveness.
Lottie23 ref my 18.29 post see the report on this link https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-9764/ I am not sure how a programme that is so far behind its original service date can be acceleration.
Lottie123 As far as I can see not mentioned in the article is the reason for this acceleration of the process. Google Ajax Tank. As an alternative do a search on the Parliament website for questions on Ajax you will need to go back to January 2020 though.
Si_Derman ref 15.56 post I could be wrong but if you look at the job functions it reads to me that they may be a technical evaluation team. This would seems to be reinforced by this comment on the post 'and discussed future building and ship repair projects.' That would seem to me to be the kind of discussion who had practical knowledge. As I said could be wrong.
Ref my 16.39 post the link to the post is https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7174067079292055553/
Just seen this
Daniel Fearnley Following Director of Energy
52m • Edited •
Looking forward to attending #windeurope2024 next week in Bilbao and discussing Harland & Wolff's continued efforts to drive this incredible market. Please reach out to discuss #offshorewind #floatingoffshorewind #shipbuilding.
I noe he says continued efforts.
Just noticed in my 10.42 I forgot the link to the fleet list it is here https://www.northstarshipping.co.uk/our-fleet
Scaffman ref 11.09 post thanks for pulling me up on not doing this it is bad practice. The link is https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7173976708532838400/
Just came acrossm this from LinkedIn Representatives from North Star Shipping were welcomed to our Belfast facility yesterday (Wednesday, March 13th).
North Star owns and operates the largest wholly UK-owned fleet operating in the UK’s offshore industry in the North Sea.
Harland & Wolff’s David Burke and Andrew Hay were on hand to provide up-close insight of the capabilities offered by our shipyard and skilled workforce, and discussed future building and ship repair projects with Alistair Nangle, Darran West and Diane Zammit from the Aberdeen-based company.
Harland & Wolff offers bespoke solutions to customers across multiple sectors with a key focus supporting the needs of the offshore industry.
I note that North Star Shipping has an extensive fleet of over 40 vessels see this link. Hopefully this visit will lead to some work on this fleet including mid life extension work.
Scaffman ref 18.11 post If you are refering to the Appeal Judges hearing the IM Appeal they cannot take it into account as it was not produced at trial.
Hebridean9 ref 11.00 post thi post seems to e contradicted by your previous post about Riverfort increasing the amount of the loan they had provided to HARL. If as you say HARL is not creditworthy why have both Barclays and Riverfort provided credit or its subsidiaries over the last six monhs or so?