RE: If it wern't for the fact we were25 Jul 2018 15:16
I believe the IPPC was not revoked on a procedural issue as such. It was revoked on appeal with a procedural issue being the reason. However the appeal was found not to be valid. It was appealed again on another technical issue. Again the appeal was found not to be valid. Can't remember how many times but I believe after three appeals the appellant was found to be vexatious, was thrown out last November and not given leave to further appeals because the appellant was considered to be vexatious.
We have been waiting since then for the IPPC reinstatement. I believe other factors have now come in to play to prevent the reinstatement in a timely manner. That's why it would appear corruption could be in play.
So having removed the IPPC in 2016 on a vexatious appeal, when it should have been left in place until the Court found one way or another, we still don't have the IPPC. The reason would appear to be political and we have already discussed who may be behind it.