AST - Current and Future15 Aug 2018 07:31
There seems to be strong division between those in favour and those against. Some manufacture their position dependent on whether they want the SP to rise or want to buy in more cheaply. It would seem those genuinely against concentrate on the BoD and their lack of O&G experience and apparent errors. Those in favour concentrate on the asset and it's value.
I would agree the Bod have much to be desired but I fall in the latter camp. The BoD are just part of a network comprising AST, JV partners and the relevant Slovenian authorities. After last week the BoD are now being 'helped' by the other parts of the network. Yesterday's conference call also improved the BoD's standing considerably and I believe many more are willing to accept the BoD now, despite their lack of experience in O&G. Cameron Davies has O&G experience but doesn't appear to feature much. Clive Carver does hold positions in other oil companies as well and seemed to know his stuff in the conference call. Colin has been gaining experience over the years he's been at AST and has been dealing pretty well with difficulties that have cropped up, especially the INA contract when the IPPC was removed in 2016.
The asset is still there with wells in place. The wells just need reopening with modern technology to access the considerable gas field. Derampers sometimes refer to other possible gas fields around the world saying they could be acquired cheaply. There is a gas field in Petisovci in Slovenia. They are part of the EU and so should, in theory, be straight forward to deal with and, just because there may be gas fields elsewhere, doesn't mean we can't deal with this one. That is a weak argument.
So AST seem to be on a much better footing and yesterday's conference call should improve sentiment substantially.