Member Info for Ssccss

Great news. Let's have the relist ASAP.

Well Zag, I hope they issue the prospectus soon and put us out of our misery.

Affrm was probably there. Ask him.

Pacman, I wish I could help you but I have never been a telegram user.

PPP said in the October 2025 Heads of Terms that, if the Ukraine transaction completed, existing shareholders would hold only a minority interest in the enlarged group... That's a hint for you.

Go on Zag, have a guess of your own. Let's see who is more accurate this time next year.

According to the accounts rns, the prospectus for the rto is in the late stages. So hopefully not too much longer to find out.

Yes oily, do you know why? Have you read that far back in the RNSs?

To be fair, they can't do it without shareholders voting yes to it.

That's a feasible guess.

Roland has done absolutely nothing apart from destroy shareholder value.

Sajad, give it up. Deluded.

I don't like all this stringing along. They need to let us know if they have applied for the request to return to trading and what the time line is. This is what they promised. Let them keep their promise and publish the timeline.

When are we coming back better and stronger? All very well taking that stance but let's see it. Otherwise, your opinion is no more valid than mine. Although, I could argue, my opinion is more strongly anchored to the facts stated in the RNSs. I would love for this to just come back from suspension and we can all move. The board know what it is everyone wants, so just get it done already. Otherwise, tell us honestly what the hold up is...

I want nothing more than for this to come back ASAP. So let's have it back. Not sure what the hold up is? Anyone know?

Zag, not sure why you are being so melodramatic. How can you construe what I've written as a full on attack. It's all in the RNSs. You seem to be taking this very badly. Best get some perspective.

"Please expand on my bad maths so I can understand where I have gone wrong"

Have we expanded enough Zag? You did ask. Don't like the answers though obviously.

Zag, I have to agree with Stuart and delta that there's no point comparing the GV JV with the deal in the RNS today, for the reasons they have given. Another good reason to add to the list is under the GV JV PPP would receive a 12.5% overriding royalty interest on production from four specific Texas wells: Chalk Talk 1H, Chalk Talk 2H, Bower 1H, and COG#1H. It also separately said PPP would get a 10% profit share on any other wells drilled or developed within the wider 2,036-acre Texas position. So comparing today's deal on one well and also the difference between net and gross, means it can't really be asserted that this is a better deal. Although, I know it sounds good as a narrative.

My point is simply, it's the same outcome as SL wanted but with a small sweetner. Nothing has changed materially from SL's approach with the new management yet. It's just better PR. I'm as bored of this as any of you. For me, its like watching a car crash in slow motion. I wish they would just return to trading ASAP before the RTO.

Zag, have you actually got anything to say about the fact everyone is getting excited over one well? You always attack me because you cant argue with the facts of the RNS.